Biden and Democrats Push for Budget Deal This
Week as Rifts Remain
Negotiators were closing in on a deal that could spend
around $1.75 trillion, but lawmakers were still haggling over critical
disagreements on the sprawling social policy bill.
Emily
Cochrane
By Emily
Cochrane
Oct. 25,
2021
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/25/us/politics/biden-democrats-reconciliation-bill.html
WASHINGTON
— President Biden and Democratic congressional leaders raced on Monday to
strike a compromise on a domestic policy and climate package, pushing for a
vote within days even as critical disagreements remained over health benefits,
paid leave, environmental provisions and how to pay for the sprawling plan.
Negotiators
were closing in on an agreement that could spend around $1.75 trillion over 10
years, half the size of the blueprint Democrats approved earlier this year, as
they haggled with centrist holdouts in their party who are pressing to curtail
the size of the bill.
They have
coalesced around a plan that would extend monthly payments to families with children,
establish generous tax incentives for clean energy use and provide federal
support for child care, elder care and universal prekindergarten. An array of
tax increases, including a new wealth tax for the country’s billionaires, would
pay for the initiatives.
But a final
deal remained elusive amid disputes over the details of potential Medicare and
Medicaid expansions, a new paid family and medical leave program, programs to
combat climate change and a proposal to lower the cost of prescription drugs.
Top Democrats were also toiling to nudge the price tag up to $2 trillion, still
far below the $3.5 trillion level they laid out in their budget plan.
Introducing
a fresh wrinkle into the talks, Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, a
centrist who has led the effort to scale back the bill, was pushing to remove
or modify a provision that would impose a fee on emissions of methane, a
powerful planet-warming pollutant that leaks from oil and gas wells, according
to two people familiar with the negotiations.
Mr. Manchin
has already effectively killed the most powerful climate change provision in
the package, a proposed $150 billion program that would replace coal- and
gas-fired power plants with wind and solar power, though that money may be
repurposed.
With
Republicans uniformly opposed to the bill, Democrats cannot afford to lose even
a single vote from their party in the 50-to-50 Senate, giving any senator the
power to sink the plan over even a single provision. That has complicated the
task facing Mr. Biden and party leaders as they prepare to muscle the bill
through Congress using a special budget process known as reconciliation that
shields it from a filibuster.
Administration
officials and Democratic leaders hoped to have a deal secured before Mr. Biden
appears at a United Nations climate conference in Glasgow that begins on
Sunday, when he is expected to push for a stronger international response to
counter global warming. Mr. Biden, who traveled to New Jersey on Monday to
promote the legislation, told reporters that it would be “very, very positive
to get it done before the trip.”
“It changes
the lives of the American people,” Mr. Biden said during an appearance at a
transit maintenance facility in Kearny, N.J., where he promoted the payments to
families with children and child care assistance in the plan. “So let’s get
this done — let’s move.”
The
president also called for quick passage of a stalled $1 trillion bipartisan
infrastructure bill, whose passage in the House could hinge on a deal on the
reconciliation package. Liberals have refused to support the infrastructure
measure until the broader policy package emerges.
Democrats
want to pass the public works legislation — approved by the Senate over the
summer — by Sunday, when a series of transportation programs is slated to
expire. Its enactment would also hand the party a popular legislative
achievement days before crucial governors’ elections in Virginia and New Jersey
on Nov. 2.
But the
reconciliation bill, widely seen as the last significant piece of legislation
with a chance of passing this year, is a heavy lift.
“No one
ever said passing transformational legislation like this would be easy, but we
are on track to get this done,” said Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the
majority leader.
Mr.
Manchin, who huddled with Mr. Biden and Mr. Schumer at the president’s home in
Wilmington, Del., on Sunday, remained a driving force in the talks as he
pressed his objections to key components of the plan. He was opposed to the
paid leave program and to proposals to expand Medicare and Medicaid, according
to officials briefed on the negotiations.
Sign Up for
On Politics A guide to the political
news cycle, cutting through the spin and delivering clarity from the chaos. Get
it sent to your inbox.
“There’s a
lot of concerns. We have a lot of different things,” Mr. Manchin told reporters
on Monday, saying he was still determined to keep the cost of the package to no
more than $1.5 trillion. “We’re just looking at how we put it together.”
Mr.
Manchin, a defender of his state’s coal industry, is also the most prominent
opponent to key climate provisions that have long been a priority for the
majority of his caucus. His sign-off on a compromise was seen as vital as Mr.
Biden prepared to appear on the world stage to promote the U.S. commitment to
tackling climate change.
A
spokeswoman for Mr. Manchin did not respond to a request for comment on his
position on the climate provisions. People briefed on the talks cautioned that
details were still in flux.
Mr. Manchin
is among the lawmakers who have expressed concerns with a push, led by Senator
Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent who is chairman of the Budget
Committee, to expand Medicare to include dental, vision and hearing benefits.
“If we’re
not being fiscally responsible, that’s really concerning,” Mr. Manchin said on
Monday, stressing that he did not want to expand the federal health program for
older people without addressing its financial stability.
He also
expressed concerns about a push to cover a Medicaid expansion for the dozen states
whose leaders have refused to expand the program under the Affordable Care Act.
Its inclusion in the plan has been a priority for Democrats who represent those
mostly southern states, such as Senator Raphael Warnock, Democrat of Georgia.
Democrats
are scaling back the ambitious bill. After weeks of bickering and negotiations,
the party is hoping to reach a compromise between its moderate and progressive
wings by substantially shrinking President Biden’s initial $3.5 trillion
domestic policy plan to an overall price tag of about $2 trillion.
Key
elements are likely to be dropped or pared back. Some measures at risk include
a plan to provide two years of free community college, the expansion of the child
tax credit and a clean electricity program — the most powerful part of
President Biden’s climate agenda, which is opposed by Senator Joe Manchin III.
Manchin’s
concerns have driven the negotiations. The West Virginia Democrat has been
clear that he wants to see a much cheaper, less generous, more targeted and
less environmentally friendly measure than the one Mr. Biden and Democrats
originally envisioned. But Mr. Manchin isn’t the only centrist holdout.
Kyrsten
Sinema has also objected to the plan. Unlike Mr. Manchin, the Democratic
senator from Arizona has been far more enigmatic with her concerns, drawing the
ire of progressive activists, former supporters and veterans. Ms. Sinema is
said to want to cut at least $100 billion from the bill’s climate programs and
is opposed to raising tax rates to pay for the plan.
A framework
has yet to emerge. No final decisions have been made on the plan — which is expected
to include education, child care, paid leave, anti-poverty and climate change
programs — and negotiations are continuing. But even with a scaled-back
version, passage of the bill is no guarantee.
But West
Virginia is among the states that expanded Medicaid and pay 10 percent of the
cost. Mr. Manchin said it would be unfair for the federal government to cover
the entire cost for states that had not done so, in essence rewarding them for
holding out.
Democrats
must also resolve their differences over how to finance the plan, after
promising moderates in their ranks that it would be fully paid for. Moderates
have balked at a proposal to lower the cost of prescription medicines by
allowing Medicare to negotiate with drug companies on prices, prompting
negotiators to look at narrower versions of that approach.
The details
of the billionaires’ tax, an entirely new approach to taxing wealth, were also
still being hammered out, although top Democrats said it could be released in
the next couple of days. And negotiators were still working out how to meet a
demand, primarily from New York and New Jersey lawmakers, to increase the
amount of state and local taxes that people can deduct from their federal tax
bill, which would benefit those living in states with high taxes.
The
proposal, which could cost hundreds of billions of dollars, is a priority for
Mr. Schumer, as well as moderate Democrats whose votes are needed to push
through the reconciliation bill, including Representative Josh Gottheimer of
New Jersey and Tom Suozzi of New York.
Because
Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, another centrist holdout on the plan, has
rejected increases to the corporate and individual tax rates, negotiators were
discussing an array of alternatives, including the wealth tax, a global
corporate minimum tax, a tax on what corporations report to shareholders and
strengthening the I.R.S.’s ability to collect unpaid taxes.
“I think we
will find a way that we can come together and have all 50 Democrats on board,”
said Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who is heavily involved in the
finance discussion. “We’re all trying to head in the same direction.”
Republicans,
who adamantly oppose the domestic policy plan, railed against the new tax
proposals under discussion on Monday.
“Our
Democratic colleagues have become so tax-hike happy that they’re throwing
spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks,” declared Senator Mitch McConnell of
Kentucky, the minority leader. “Now they’re talking about rewiring the entire
economy after a couple of days’ discussions on the back of an envelope. It’s a
massive and untested change.”
Mr. Biden
did not address the issue, or the state of negotiations, directly in his
speech. But he outlined the benefits of his plans, leaning heavily into efforts
to repair bridges and invest in passenger rail service, in an effort to win
over voters in a state where Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, is seeking
re-election on Nov. 2.
Mr. Biden
stopped earlier in the day at an early childhood education center, as part of
an effort to spotlight the plan to provide federally guaranteed prekindergarten
for 3- and 4-year-olds.
Karine
Jean-Pierre, a White House spokeswoman, told reporters on Air Force One on
Monday that Democrats had reached the point where they were negotiating “the
nitty-gritty of the details” in the package.
“We have a
strong base of agreement,” Ms. Jean-Pierre said. “We’re continuing to
negotiate. We’re almost there.”
Coral
Davenport, Jim Tankersley and Margot Sanger-Katz contributed reporting.
Emily
Cochrane is a reporter in the Washington bureau, covering Congress. She was
raised in Miami and graduated from the University of Florida. @ESCochrane
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário