As China Boomed, It Didn’t Take Climate Change
Into Account. Now It Must.
China’s breathtaking economic growth created cities
ill-equipped to face extreme weather. Last week’s dramatic floods showed that
much will have to change.
Steven Lee
MyersKeith BradsherChris Buckley
By Steven
Lee Myers, Keith Bradsher and Chris Buckley
July 26,
2021
Updated
9:17 a.m. ET
阅读简体中文版閱讀繁體中文版
China’s
breakneck growth over the last four decades erected soaring cities where there
had been hamlets and farmland. The cities lured factories, and the factories
lured workers. The boom lifted hundreds of millions of people out of the
poverty and rural hardship they once faced.
Now those
cities face the daunting new challenge of adapting to extreme weather caused by
climate change, a possibility that few gave much thought to when the country
began its extraordinary economic transformation. China’s pell-mell, brisk
urbanization has in some ways made the challenge harder to face.
No one
weather event can be directly linked to climate change, but the storm that
flooded Zhengzhou and other cities in central China last week, killing at least
69 as of Monday, reflects a global trend of extreme weather that has seen
deadly flooding recently in Germany and Belgium, and severe heat and wildfires
in Siberia. The flooding in China, which engulfed subway lines, washed away
roads and cut off villages, also highlights the environmental vulnerabilities
that accompanied the country’s economic boom and could yet undermine it.
China has
always had floods, but as Kong Feng, then a public policy professor at Tsinghua
University in Beijing, wrote in 2019, the flooding of cities across China in
recent years is “a general manifestation of urban problems” in the country.
The vast
expansion of roads, subways and railways in cities that swelled almost
overnight meant there were fewer places where rain could safely be absorbed —
disrupting what scientists call the natural hydrological cycle.
Faith Chan,
a professor of geology with the University of Nottingham in Ningbo in eastern
China, said the country’s cities — and there are 93 with populations of more
than a million — modernized at a time when Chinese leaders made climate
resiliency less of a priority than economic growth.
“If they
had a chance to build a city again, or to plan one, I think they would agree to
make it more balanced,” said Mr. Chan, who is also a visiting fellow at the
Water@Leeds Research Institute of the University of Leeds.
China has
already taken some steps to begin to address climate change. Xi Jinping is the
country’s first leader to make the issue a national priority.
As early as
2013, Mr. Xi promised to build an “ecological civilization” in China. “We must
maintain harmony between man and nature and pursue sustainable development,” he
said in a speech in Geneva in 2013.
The country
has nearly quintupled the acreage of green space in its cities over the past
two decades. It introduced a pilot program to create “sponge cities,” including
Zhengzhou, that better absorb rainfall. Last year, Mr. Xi pledged to speed up
reductions in emissions and reach carbon neutrality by 2060. It was a tectonic
shift in policy and may prove to be one in practice, as well.
The
question is whether it is too late. Even if countries like China and the United
States rapidly cut greenhouse gases, the warming from those already emitted is
likely to have long-lasting consequences.
Rising sea
levels now threaten China’s coastal metropolises, while increasingly severe
storms will batter inland cities that, like Zhengzhou, are sinking under the
weight of development that was hastily planned, with buildings and
infrastructure that were sometimes shoddily constructed.
Even
Beijing, which was hit by a deadly flash flood in 2012 that left 79 dead, still
does not have the drainage system needed to siphon away rainfall from a major
storm, despite the capital’s glittering architectural landmarks signifying
China’s rising status.
In
Zhengzhou, officials described the torrential rains that fell last week as a once-in-a-millennium
storm that no amount of planning could have prevented.
Even so,
people have asked why the city’s new subway system flooded, trapping passengers
as water steadily rose, and why a “smart tunnel” under the city’s third ring
road flooded so rapidly that people in cars had little time to escape.
The
worsening impact of climate change could pose a challenge to the ruling
Communist Party, given that political power in China has long been associated
with the ability to master natural disasters. A public groundswell several
years ago about toxic air pollution in Beijing and other cities ultimately
forced the government to act.
“As we have
more and more events like what has happened over the last few days, I do think
there will be more national realization of the impact of climate change and
more reflection on what we should do about it,” said Li Shuo, a climate analyst
with Greenpeace in China.
China’s
urbanization has in some ways made the adjustment easier. It has relocated
millions of people from countryside villages that had far fewer defenses
against recurring floods. That is why the toll of recent floods has been in the
hundreds and thousands, not in the millions, as some of the worst disasters in
the country’s history were.
The
experience of Zhengzhou, though, underscores the extent of the challenges that
lie ahead — and the limits of easy solutions.
Once a mere
crossroads south of a bend in the Yellow River, the city has expanded
exponentially since China’s economic reforms began more than 40 years ago.
Today,
skyscrapers and apartment towers stretch into the distance. The city’s
population has doubled since 2001, reaching 12.6 million.
Zhengzhou
floods so frequently that residents mordantly joke about it. “No need to envy
those cities where you can view the sea,” read one online comment that spread
during a flood in 2011, according to a report in a local newspaper. “Today we
welcome you to view the sea in Zhengzhou.”
The idea,
not unlike what planners in the United States call “low-impact development,” is
to channel water away from dense urban spaces into parks and lakes, where it
can be absorbed or even recycled.
Yu
Kongjian, the dean of the School of Landscape Architecture at Peking
University, is credited with popularizing the idea in China. He said in a
telephone interview that in its rapid development since the 1980s, China had
turned to designs from the West that were ill-suited for the extremes that the
country’s climate was already experiencing. Cities were covered in cement,
“colonized,” as he put it, by “gray infrastructure.”
China, in
his view, needs to “revive ancient wisdom and upgrade it,” setting aside
natural spaces for water and greenery the way ancient farmers once did.
Under the
program, Zhengzhou has built more than 3,000 miles of new drainage, eliminated
125 flood-prone areas and created hundreds of acres of new green spaces,
according to an article in Zhengzhou Daily, a state-owned newspaper.
One such
space is Diehu Park, or Butterfly Lake Park, where weeping willows and camphor
trees surround an artificial lake. It opened only last October. It, too, was
inundated last week.
“Sponges
absorb water slowly, not fast,” Dai Chuanying, a maintenance worker at the
park, said on Friday. “If there’s too much water, the sponge cannot absorb all
of it.”
Even before
this past week’s flooding, some had questioned the concept. After the city saw
flooding in 2019, the China Youth Daily, a party-run newspaper, lamented that
the heavy spending on the projects had not resulted in significant
improvements.
Others
noted that sponge cities were not a panacea. They were never intended for
torrential rain like that in Zhengzhou on July 20, when eight inches of rain
fell in one hour.
“Although
the sponge city initiative is an excellent sustainable development approach for
stormwater management, it is still debatable whether it can be regarded as the
complete solution to flood risk management in a changing climate,” said
Konstantinos Papadikis, dean of the School of Design at Xi’an
Jiaotong-Liverpool University in Xi’an.
The
factories that have driven China’s growth also pumped out more and more of the
gases that contribute to climate change, while also badly polluting the air.
Like countries everywhere, China now faces the tasks of reducing emissions and
preparing for the effects of global warming that increasingly seem unavoidable.
Mr. Chan,
the professor, said that in China the issue of climate change has not been as
politically polarizing as in, for example, the United States. That could make
it easier to build public support for the changes local and national
governments have to make, many of which will be costly.
“I know for
cities, the questions of land use are expensive, but we’re talking about
climate change,” he said. “We’re talking about future development for the next
generation or the next, next generation.”
Li You
contributed research.
Steven Lee
Myers is the Beijing bureau chief for The New York Times. He joined The Times
in 1989 and has previously worked as a correspondent in Moscow, Baghdad and
Washington. He is the author of “The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir
Putin,” published by Alfred A. Knopf in 2015. @stevenleemyers • Facebook
Keith
Bradsher is the Shanghai bureau chief. He previously served as Hong Kong bureau
chief, Detroit bureau chief, Washington correspondent covering international
trade and then the U.S. economy, telecommunications reporter in New York and
airlines reporter. @KeithBradsher
Chris
Buckley is chief China correspondent and has lived in China for most of the
past 30 years after growing up in Sydney, Australia. Before joining The Times
in 2012, he was a correspondent in Beijing for Reuters. @ChuBailiang



Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário