Analysis
What’s
next for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson?
Robyn
Vinter
Former
duchess has stood by the former prince through waves of allegations and has yet
to comment on his arrest
Thu 19
Feb 2026 19.39 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/19/andrew-mountbatten-windsors-ex-wife-sarah-ferguson
While the
spotlight has been on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, his arrest has prompted
questions about what is next for his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson.
Ferguson,
known by the tabloids as Fergie, married the then prince Andrew in 1986 and was
divorced from him 10 years later after an alleged affair with an American
financial adviser. It was one of multiple scandals in the 1990s and 2000s
involving the former duchess, who was widely considered an embarrassment to the
royal family.
Ferguson
has stood by Mountbatten-Windsor through waves of allegations produced by his
links to Jeffrey Epstein, though she was yet to comment on his arrest on
Thursday.
She has
previously described him as “amazing” and said they were “the happiest divorced
couple in the world”, later rejecting the claims against him and calling his
alleged victim Virginia Giuffre a liar.
While
Ferguson’s ties to Mountbatten-Windsor have kept her adjacent to the Epstein
scandal, it is her own closeness to the convicted sex offender that is
threatening to make her persona non grata in the public sphere as more details
come to light.
News of
the former prince’s arrest came only days after it was revealed that six of
Ferguson’s businesses are set to be struck off the register of Companies House,
after becoming dormant. It is not clear what each of them did, but one appeared
to be a public relations business, while another appeared to be in the retail
sector.
Ferguson,
whose money problems have been well documented over the years, and who has
struggled to be financially independent, exchanged many emails with Epstein,
even after he was convicted in 2008 for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
A string
of revelations have uncovered Ferguson’s financial ties – even an alleged
dependence – on Epstein. The allegations have also opened up questions about
the funding of the lifestyles of her daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie, now in
their 30s, who were pictured going on lavish holidays during their 20s while
working relatively low-paid jobs.
Ferguson
has been involved in several scandals that appeared to be attempts to cash in
on her royal connections, including two tell-all memoirs, in 1996 and 2011, and
in 2010 when she was exposed in a News of the World sting operation attempting
to sell access to her former husband in return for £500,000. She told Mazher
Mahmood, who was undercover as the “Fake Sheikh”, that she would “open any door
you want”, promising him he would get his investment back tenfold.
Later
apologising for the scandal, Ferguson said it was “true my finances are under
stress”.
The
Epstein files, the tranche of documents gathered by US authorities in the
investigation into the disgraced financier, have shown some of the extent to
which she financially depended on the friendship with him, including evidence
he wired Ferguson $150,000 (£104,000) in 2001, which she said was for share
options she had earned as an “ambassador” for Weight Watchers, which had gone
public earlier that year.
She
initially claimed to have cut ties with Epstein as soon as she became aware of
the allegations against him in 2006. However, emails contained in the US
department of justice files showed she maintained her closeness with him.
“Cannot
wait to see you,” she wrote in one email in 2009. Another email between Epstein
and his assistant showed he paid $14,080 to fly Ferguson and her two daughters,
then 19 and 20, to the US for lunch.
Days
later she wrote to him: “Thank you Jeffrey for being the brother I have always
wished for.”
The
following year, in another email, she wrote: “You are a legend.” Later in the
same email, she added: “I am at your service. Just marry me.”
Nine
months later, Ferguson publicly apologised for her association with him, saying
in an interview with the Evening Standard newspaper: “I abhor paedophilia and
any sexual abuse of children and know this was a gigantic error of judgment on
my behalf.”
But in
private, the former duchess emailed Epstein to “humbly apologise” for
denouncing him publicly, calling him “a supreme friend to me and my family”.
Later,
when the conversation became public, she told the media she had sent that email
to him to “assuage Epstein and his threats”.
When the
US government released the first tranche of Epstein files in September last
year, a number of charities associated with the then duchess cut ties with her,
including the Teenage Cancer Trust and the children’s hospice Julia’s House,
both of which she was patron.
The
Natasha Allergy Research Foundation issued a statement saying the charity was
“disturbed” to read her comments, and also dropped her as a patron.
Nothing
uncovered in the files has indicated any criminal activity by Ferguson, who
appeared to stop using the duchess title when her ex-husband was stripped of
his title, though it may be one scandal too many.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário