London Playbook PM: Political football
By EMILIO
CASALICCHIO
with NOAH
KEATE
https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/london-playbook/london-playbook-political-football/
FRIDAY
CHEAT SHEET
—
Ministers are waging war against police in a row about banning Israeli fans
from a football match.
— Kemi
Badenoch sparked a row with Shabana Mahmood over who knew what and when.
— The
Chinese issued a threat to Keir Starmer. No.10 said he’s not scared.
— Rachel
Reeves vowed to slash welfare spending before the end of this parliament.
— The
Tories gave a helping hand to Reform exile Rupert Lowe.
TOP OF
THE NEWSLIST
POLITICAL
FOOTBALL: Ministers are waging an all-out campaign against West Midlands Police
to allow fans of an Israeli football team to attend a match in Birmingham.
Operational
matters are (not) for the police: Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Home Secretary
Shabana Mahmood, Communities Secretary Steve Reed and Sports Secretary Lisa
Nandy have all been deployed to lobby organizations in their remit to overturn
the ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans heading to the Nov. 6 Europa League match
against Aston Villa.
Reminder:
Police backed a decision from the Birmingham Safety Advisory Group to bar away
fans from the match amid expectations of violence which officers claim not to
have the resources to handle. West Midlands Police cited current intelligence
and previous clashes with Maccabi fans amid tensions over the conflict in Gaza.
How to
mobilize a pressure campaign: Mahmood is chatting with police while Reed is
pestering Birmingham council and Nandy is haranguing officials across
government. It’s not clear what role the PM is taking but he has been spitting
some strong lines.
For
example: “The PM has been angered by this decision,” one of his spokespeople
told hacks at the noon briefing. “Football has been a unifying force for
decades, and everyone should be able to attend the football match without fear
of violence or intimidation, regardless of their religion, nationality or
background. We should not have a country where we have to tell people to stay
away from certain events because we cannot protect them or they may be a victim
of racism.”
This is
fine: Downing Street said it was breaking from the usual refusal to comment on
police operations because the PM is “perfectly entitled to speak out on issues
of fundamental principles of fairness.” Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat — who
railed in the Commons this week about all the by-the-book-ism from Starmer in
lieu of political leadership — will be pleased. Police said if the government
wants to make decisions on this stuff it might want to change the law.
Handbags!
Late to
the game: Kemi Badenoch (of course) seized on suggestions there’s a conspiracy
afoot, claiming Mahmood “knew Jewish football fans were being banned from a
U.K. stadium, and did nothing.” She made the comments after the UK Football
Policing Unit (officers who focus on this stuff) said it briefed the Home
Office last week about possible issues authorities might face and possible
restrictions on fans.
A
Badenoch interpretation: A political aide to Mahmood said the claim was
“categorically untrue. The first time the home secretary knew that the fans
were being banned was last night. Rather than baseless political point scoring,
the home secretary is working tirelessly to ensure all fans can attend the game
safely.” Officials said Mahmood was indeed aware last week that the discussion
was happening but without a final decision — and that it would have been wrong
to intervene before a decision was made.
More on
the anti-side: Labour West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner Simon Foster
issued a statement condemning the ban … as did former hostage Emily Damari … as
did Sport Committee Chair Caroline Dinenage … and the Campaign Against
Anti-Semitism said it was launching a judicial review over the ban.
Food for
thought: Surely if the government can mobilize police from around Britain to
protect Donald Trump for a three-day state visit it can work out how to
resource a football match? The Safety Advisory Group told the Beeb it made its
decision based on advice from West Midlands Police and will reconsider if the
police change their risk assessment.
Which
might wind up … the left-wing MPs who have been welcoming the ban and urging
football authorities to go further in a bid to punish Israel for its actions in
Gaza.
Elsewhere
in Gaza fallout news: The legal challenge to the ban on Palestine Action can go
ahead next month, the Court of Appeal ruled, after dimissing the Home Office
bid to block the case … and broadcast watchdog Ofcom said the Beeb committed a
“serious” rules breach when it failed to disclose that the narrator of a doc
about Gaza was the son of a Hamas official. Our self-flagellating national
broadcaster has a full writeup of that one.
And
speaking of tensions between communities: Thomas Harding reports for the
National that plans to introduce an Islamophobia law have been ditched, amid
fears it would amount to a reintroduction of blasphemy laws.
ENEMY/THREAT/CHALLENGE/OPPORTUNITY
… HEADACHE
BLACKMAIL
IN A RED ENVELOPE: The Chinese government has now resorted to threats about the
massive embassy it wants to build in London, after the housing department
postponed its decision on the bid due to the ongoing political horrorshow
legitimate reasons relating to the planning process.
Calm it
down, lads: Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a “press
conference” this morning Britain would “bear all consequences” if the 20,000
square meter embassy application is blocked. He said China had offered “the
utmost sincerity and patience” during talks over the site, while Britain had
shown “disregard for contractual spirit, acting in bad faith and without
integrity.” He said the U.K. must “immediately fulfill its obligations and
honor its commitments.”
What
commitments? A spokesperson for Keir Starmer said the government “does not
recognize” suggestions that commitments or contractual obligations have been
made.
Bear in
mind: These dudes aren’t used to what we refer to in the U.K. as “political
turmoil,” so can’t be blamed for thinking the government can just bulldoze
these things through while silencing dissenters. But making threats to another
nation when we’re all supposed to be not-enemies is a bit much. Downing Street
said the PM was not afraid of the threat — no doubt because he’s a “hard
b*stard”.
Problem
is … he might not look all that hard to the White House. As former government
comms chief Abigail Morris notes on her Transatlantic Tea Substack, the limited
U.S. coverage of the Chinese espionage case debacle has not been too favorable
to the government line. She notes that the Washington Examiner piece on it
concludes that “Starmer has decided to prioritize economic engagement with
China over broader national security concerns.”
On that
note: Conservative Leader Kemi Badenoch was loving the comments from a U.S.
congressional committee chair arguing the espionage case being dropped could
signal a “broader shift in China policy that would be of deep concern to many
of the U.K.’s core allies.” It notes concern about the government’s “seeming
unwillingness” to ensure the case went to trial. Also not the line! Badenoch
said the letter showed other nations are “wondering what the Labour government
is doing.”
Never
worth not repeating: The China stance under the Conservatives was a tortuous
dance to avoid branding the giant an overall national security (rather than
economic) “threat” in official documents, while at the same time courting
Chinese investment and trade. See here and here. Some things never change,
including political parties holding opponents to higher standards than
themselves.
DRIVETIME
DEBRIEF
BENEFITS
OF BEING CHANCELLOR: Rachel Reeves confirmed to Channel 4 she will slash
welfare at the upcoming budget, in comments that will give soft-left Labour MPs
the willies. “We can’t leave welfare untouched,” the chancellor said in the
interview during her visit to Washington DC. “We can’t get to the end of this
parliamentary session and I’ve basically done nothing. We have to do reform in
the right way and take people with us.”
It’s a
go-around: Reeves (and Keir Starmer and Liz Kendall) of course failed to
convince Labour backbenchers to support their welfare-cutting plans in summer,
leading to a humiliating retreat. Her comments now about not being able to do
nothing pitch the looming second round of the battle as a serious personal
test.
Where
some cuts could come: In the Times, Chris Smyth reports Reeves might end VAT
and insurance premium tax breaks on cars leased under a disability assistance
scheme that has become a bête noire of right-wing Twitter. The Treasury reckons
it could reap an extra £1 billion via the taxes on the Motability scheme — the
workings of which have become muddied in a swamp of disinformation. Reeves
could also stop benefit claimants upgrading their leased vehicles, which can be
done in exchange for payment.
Worth a
listen: Screeching headline antidote Radio 4 show More or Less this week
featured an explainer about how the scheme works. Worth listening to as this
row drives ahead.
COURT
CIRCULAR: Two Ukrainian men pled not guilty to carrying out arson attacks on
properties and a car linked to Keir Starmer. Via video link from HMP Belmarsh,
Roman Lavrynovych, 21, denied setting fire to two addresses where the PM
previously lived and torching a vehicle once owned by him, while Petro
Pochynok, 35, also denied one charge of conspiracy to commit arson with intent
to endanger life. Stanislav Carpiuc, 27, is yet to enter a plea on a charge of
conspiracy ahead of the trial next April. The Beeb has a writeup.
WHAT IS
GOING ON HERE? The Tories confirmed the rumor popping around SW1 WhatsApps that
they have gifted one of their spots on the Public Accounts Committee to Reform
exile Rupert Lowe. A spokesperson said “having someone who has run a business
and shares our values on cutting waste” on the committee will help it
scrutinize public spending. Interesting that one of their own MPs wasn’t
considered more capable.
Speaking
of the Tories moving to the right: A former Conservative donor has attacked the
Conservative decision to abandon net zero. See his piece in the Guardian.
COUNCIL
OF DESPAIR: Spring elections in councils undergoing structural reorganization
could be postponed again, to avoid races being held in 2026 then again in 2027
once the restructuring is complete, Times hack Max Kendix reported. Playbook PM
hears discussions on the issue are indeed happening, also because elections are
expensive and contests in 2026 could see councillors in post for such short
periods before re-starting campaigns. No decisions have been made and
government officials insist it has nothing to do with party politics.
Tell that
to … Nigel Farage, who of course would never skip a chance to claim the
establishment is working against him. He posted a video here.
Speaking
of local elections: The Lib Dems were bragging about winning seven out of 10
council by-elections last night (although three of those were holds, and the
party lost one of its existing seats to Reform when its vote collapsed.) Leader
Ed Davey celebrated by paddling around a Berkshire lake on a raft he built
himself, while complaining about Thames Water, natch.
SOCIAL
(MEDIA) AFFAIRS
NOT GOOD
ENOUGH: The science and tech committee is not impressed with the government
dismissing its proposals to tackle online misinformation, which the MPs
insisted are needed to prevent further post-Southport riots. PolHome has a
writeup.
ON THE
BACK FOOT, FOR A CHANGE: Reform boss Nigel Farage showed he’s worried about
claims he is too soft on Vladimir Putin, sharing his Bloomberg interview on
social media highlighting the anti-Russia line. Bear in mind Keir Starmer
flagged during PMQs this week that a former Farage colleague took Russian
bribes.
No
letting up: Labour chair Anna Turley responded to Farage criticizing Russia
that “having called Vladimir Putin the leader he most admired, and with his
close associate and former Reform Leader in Wales having admitted taking bribes
to praise Russia, Nigel Farage is now panicking and desperately trying to
backtrack.” Not that it seems to be making a difference to the surging Reform
support in Wales as the Labour vote there collapses.
WHOOPS!
Looks like Labour deputy leadership hopeful Lucy Powell had a data-sharing
snafu. At least she didn’t ask China to host her email database.
BEYOND
THE M25
COMING
ATTRACTIONS: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will arrive at the White
House around 6 p.m. U.K. time for his fourth face-to-face meeting with Donald
Trump this year. The two leaders will have a bilateral lunch where Zelenskyy
will press for U.S.-made weapons allowing Kyiv to strike deeper inside Russia —
something Vladimir Putin has warned could fracture the relationship between
Washington and Moscow. POLITICO’s D.C. Playbook has you covered.
MIDDLE
EAST LATEST: The U.N. World Food Program warned aid into Gaza remains
critically scarce one week into the ceasefire, as Israel delayed the entry of
food convoys. WFP spokesperson Abeer Etefa said it had brought about 560 tons
of food a day on average into the strip but “we’re still below what we need.”
The Guardian has a writeup.
Sanctions
halted: My colleagues hear from four European diplomats that an EU plan to
sanction Israel’s government ministers and cut back on trade ties has been put
on ice as many countries think it’s no longer necessary in light of the
U.S.-brokered peace agreement.
ALTERNATIVE
FACTS: India’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal cast
doubt on Donald Trump’s claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi phoned him to
say New Delhi would end its purchases of Russian oil. Jaiswal said he was unaware of a conversation
between the two leaders and “discussions are ongoing” about closer energy
cooperation with America. My Stateside colleagues have further info.
**A
message from Rolls-Royce: The Government wants its industrial strategy to
deliver growth. Support for Rolls-Royce can deliver high-skilled jobs and huge
export potential. Our expertise is enabling us to expand into advanced nuclear
technologies. Rolls-Royce SMR is Europe’s leading Small Modular Reactor (SMR)
business and the preferred bidder to develop the UK’s first SMRs, providing
energy resilience and zero-carbon power. Delivering those first three SMRs will
support an average of almost 8,000 high-skilled UK jobs per year, while
building a fleet could contribute £54bn for the British economy and unlock
significant export opportunities. The Government is committed to getting
nuclear project sites approved and progressed more quickly and we must now work
at pace to realise the benefits of the UK’s first mover advantage in SMRs. Our
expertise is also enabling us to expand into advanced modular reactors (AMRs)
where UK support could open up a global industrial market worth billions.**

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário