How Can
the Government Stop Harvard From Enrolling International Students?
The Trump
administration is relying on an obscure bureaucratic lever to stop the school,
the latest in a series of aggressive moves.
Miriam
Jordan
By Miriam
Jordan
May 22, 2025
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/22/us/harvard-international-students-trump-sevis.html
The Trump
administration wants to halt Harvard from enrolling international students. But
how can the federal government dictate which students a private university can
and cannot enroll?
The
government has enormous power over who comes into the United States, and who
doesn’t. For college and universities, the Department of Homeland Security has
a vast system just to manage and track the enrollment of the hundreds of
thousands of international students studying across the country at any given
time.
But a school
needs government certification to use this database, known as SEVIS, for the
Student and Exchange Visitor Information System. And this vulnerability is what
the Trump administration is exploiting against Harvard.
Homeland
Security says that effective immediately, it has revoked a certification that
allows Harvard to have access to SEVIS. Oddly enough, the students may still
have valid visas. But Harvard is no longer able to log them into this
all-important database.
The
announcement was a significant escalation in the administration’s efforts to
pressure Harvard to fall in line with the president’s agenda.
Here’s what
we know so far.
How does
Harvard use the SEVIS database?
For each
international student, Harvard inputs data into SEVIS to show that a student is
enrolled full time, and thus meeting the terms of the visa that the student was
issued.
The system
is overseen by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, an arm of Homeland
Security, which announced the termination on Thursday.
At Harvard,
more than a quarter of its total student body, or 6,800 students, come from
other countries.
How are
international students at Harvard affected?
The SEVIS
termination for Harvard would mean that all foreign students at the school
would be in limbo. The students would, en masse, become deportable immediately,
unless they transferred to another school, or unless a court intervened to
block the termination by Homeland Security. Students who took no action to
enroll elsewhere would be violating the terms of their status and subject to
removal.
After
graduating, international students have 60 days from the end of their program
to leave the United States or adjust their immigration status, by obtaining a
job, for example.
Students who
are returning to university programs typically can remain in the country during
summer breaks because they are still enrolled for the coming term.
But if SEVIS
is terminated for Harvard, it’s unclear if students who would otherwise be
returning would still be granted the summer grace period.
The current
spring term at Harvard ends on May 26, according to the university’s calendar.
But don’t
international students have visas?
It does not
appear that Homeland Security revoked the student visas of Harvard’s
international students. That means, in theory, they could leave or stay for the
summer. They could go back to their home countries, potentially, and return to
attend another school. Much of this is still unclear.
What might
Harvard do next?
Harvard
could go to court to try to challenge its SEVIS termination.
Carl Tobias,
an expert on the federal courts at University of Richmond School of Law, said
that Harvard would very likely sue in federal court in Massachusetts asserting
that the actions of the Homeland Security secretary, Kristi Noem, violated the
law by effectively dismantling the university’s international program and
preventing it from recruiting students from around the globe.
“Harvard
will argue that the actions of the secretary are arbitrary and capricious,” Mr.
Tobias said. “A court is likely to find that she lacks the power to eliminate
its program for international students.”
Stacy
Tolchin, an immigration lawyer who represents international students, said that
the university would have a “clear case challenge for retaliation from DHS
based on First Amendment-protected activities.”
Miriam
Jordan reports from a grass roots perspective on immigrants and their impact on
the demographics, society and economy of the United States.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário