sexta-feira, 28 de fevereiro de 2025

Trump and Vance attack Zelenskyy in remarkable Oval Office exchange

 


White House

Trump and Vance attack Zelenskyy in remarkable Oval Office exchange

 

The president and vice president each had harsh words for the Ukrainian president.

 

By Eli Stokols

02/28/2025 12:58 PM EST

Updated: 02/28/2025 01:54 PM EST

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/28/trump-vance-zelenskyy-oval-office-exchange-00206727

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy came to Washington optimistic that signing President Donald Trump’s desired minerals deal would stabilize their relationship and keep the U.S. on his side.

 

Turns out he was walking into an ambush.

 

Trump and Vice President JD Vance both turned on the embattled wartime leader during a remarkably tense exchange in the Oval Office on Friday, accusing Zelenskyy of failing to express sufficient gratitude for U.S. involvement and overplaying what they said was a weak diplomatic hand.

 

“You’ve done enough talking. You’re not winning this,” Trump said, raising his voice to Zelenskyy. “You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of us.”

 

The fireworks started more than 40 minutes into what had been a cordial conversation about the economic agreement the two countries planned to sign and vague assurances from Trump about the U.S. standing with Ukraine if and when its war with Russia ends. But after the remarkable and very public spat, Zelenskyy was turned away from the White House, departing early as the leaders scrubbed a planned press conference and the signing of the framework for a deal to share future profits from Ukraine’s rare minerals.

 

Trump dismissed Zelenskyy with a TruthSocial post just before the leader’s SUV pulled back into the West Wing portico to ferry him away. “I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations,” the president wrote. “I don’t want an advantage. I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace.”

 

Trump, who during the campaign said he could quickly and easily end the war, is now facing a more complicated geopolitical reality. But he continues to exert pressure on Ukraine, reversing America’s stance that defending the country’s sovereignty from Russian attacks was critical for global stability and security.

 

Russia’s foreign minister this week made clear that the Kremlin is not inclined to come to the negotiating table as it continues to make slow inroads along the war’s current battle lines in eastern Ukraine. But Trump has yet to criticize Putin publicly and instead has adopted the Kremlin’s positions, including opposition to NATO membership for Ukraine and the falsehood that Ukraine is responsible for starting the war. Russia attacked Ukraine three years ago without provocation.

 

Vance, who’d been sitting quietly during Friday’s meeting, took issue with the Ukrainian president’s criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who Zelenskyy referred to as a “terrorist” known for breaking his word as he pleaded for American military backing before a phalanx of TV cameras and journalists.

 

“I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office, litigating in front of the American media,” Vance told Zelenskyy. “Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems, you should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict.”

 

Trump, who had earlier lauded Ukraine’s courage throughout the war and left the door open to the U.S. providing security guarantees, grew more animated as Zelenskyy tangled with Vance, who dismissed his invitation to come see the war in person as a “propaganda tour” aimed at maintaining the West’s financial support.

 

Zelenskyy warned Trump that — despite having a “nice ocean” separating the U.S. from Europe — America would eventually feel the impact of Russia overtaking Ukraine and potentially its neighbors.

 

“Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel,” Trump shot back. “We’re trying to solve a problem.

 

He continued: “You’re in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel. We’re going to feel very good and very strong.”

 

Zelenskyy struggled to respond as Trump and Vance took turns infantilizing and berating him for what they said was a lack of gratitude and his strategic decision to state his case with the press in the room.

 

“Let’s go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you’re wrong,” Vance said.

 

“You have to be thankful,” Trump told Zelenskyy, expressing frustration that Ukraine’s leader, whose country has staved off Russian forces for three years, wasn’t more willing to make concessions that would quickly end the war. “You don’t have the cards. You’re buried there. You people are dying. You’re running low on soldiers.”

 

Trump reminded Zelenskyy that he provided Ukraine with Javelin missiles in his first term — after President Barack Obama did not in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Crimea.

 

“You’ve got to be more thankful, because, let me tell you, you don’t have the cards. With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don’t have any cards,” said Trump, suggesting that it was Zelenskyy’s posture — not Putin’s — that was the primary impediment to ending the war.

 

“It’ll be a tough deal to make, because the attitudes have to change,” Trump said. “You’re either going to make a deal or we’re out. And if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. And I don’t think it’s going to be pretty.”

Trump administration asks Zelenskyy to leave White House after tense exc...

Zelenskyy told to leave White House after fiery Oval Office meeting

What happened after the Trump-Zelenskyy heated exchange?

'JD Vance is a piece of sh*t' | Adam Boulton tears into Trump's explosive row with Zelensky


“This was a premeditated gangster-like ambush. It was low blows. It was clearly deliberate.”

Donald Trump and JD Vance were “goading” Volodymyr Zelensky into humiliating himself, says Tim Marshall.


Trump gets into irate screaming match with Zelensky in Oval Office

Nato in ruins after Trump’s explosive exchange with Zelensky

Macron pointedly backs Ukraine over 'aggressor' Russia responding to Trump-Zelenskyy clash

 

 


https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/feb/28/volodymyr-zelenskyy-donald-trump-us-minerals-deal-russia-ukraine-live-news?filterKeyEvents=false&page=with%3Ablock-67c201bf8f081ffa02a936e1#top-of-blog


Macron pointedly backs Ukraine over 'aggressor' Russia responding to Trump-Zelenskyy clash

French president Emmanuel Macron highlighted that Russia is the aggressor, and Ukrainians are the aggressed people, when asked for his response to a clash between US president Donald Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

 

“We must ... respect those who have been fighting since the beginning,” he told reporters on the sidelines of his visit to Portugal, quoted by Reuters.

 

15m ago

18.58 GMT

No mineral deals signed, White House confirms

Not that we were in any doubt, but the White House has just confirmed that Trump and Zelenskyy did not sign a mineral deals during their talks today.

 

Trump has not ruled out an agreement, but not until Ukraine is ready to have a constructive conversation, a senior US official told Reuters.

 

15m ago

18.57 GMT

If you’re trying to find someone happy with the outcome of the talks in the Oval Office, we’re just getting this line from the AFP:

 

Trump-Zelensky shouting match ‘historic’, says top Russian official

 

20m ago

18.53 GMT

Poland's Tusk publicly backs Zelenskyy after clash with Trump

Polish prime minister Donald Tusk responds to scenes in the Oval Office:

 

He says in a social media update:

 

Dear @ZelenskyyUa, dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone.

Watch tense Oval Office argument between Zelensky, Trump and Vance

Trump-Zelenskyy talks cut short after heated exchanges in Oval Office - summary

 


From 21m ago

18.43 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/feb/28/volodymyr-zelenskyy-donald-trump-us-minerals-deal-russia-ukraine-live-news?filterKeyEvents=false&page=with%3Ablock-67c201bf8f081ffa02a936e1#block-67c201bf8f081ffa02a936e1

 

Trump-Zelenskyy talks cut short after heated exchanges in Oval Office - summary

 

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s visit to the White House has been cut short after he got into a heated exchange with US president Donald Trump and vice-president JD Vance, who accused him of “disrespectful” behaviour during their talks in the Oval Office.

 

In a social media update, Trump said he has determined that Zelenskyy “is not ready for peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations”, and said the Ukrainian leader “disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office”. “He can come back when he is ready for peace,” he added.

 

In their earlier talks, Trump repeatedly told Zelenskyy that he was “gambling with the lives of millions, with the third world war”, and telling him to stop holding out for further security guarantees saying “you’re either going to make a deal or we are out”.

 

Trump appeared to mask differences by drawing false equivalence between the two sides of the war and positioning himself “for both Ukraine and Russia” as he pursues a peace deal, in stark contrast to Zelenskyy’s comments about Putin as a “killer” and “terrorist” who invaded Ukraine, and with whom he was not ready to compromise on the Ukrainian territory.

 

The pair repeatedly clashed over their view of Russia and the negotiations, as well as the extent of the European support for Ukraine.

 

JD Vance also falsely accused Zelenskyy for not thanking the US for its support and “campaigning for the opposition in October,” instead of showing “words of appreciation for the US and the president who is trying to save your country.”

 

Zelenskyy has left the White House moments ago, with the press conference between the two leaders, where they were expected to sign a deal on minerals, also cancelled.

Trump Administration Live Updates: Trump and Vance Loudly Berate Zelensky in Oval Office

 


Trump Administration Live Updates: Trump and Vance Loudly Berate Zelensky in Oval Office

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/02/28/us/trump-news

 

President Trump and Vice President JD Vance scolded President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine during a meeting in the Oval Office on Friday, claiming he was not grateful enough for U.S. aid.

“Do you disagree that you’ve had problems bringing people into your military?” “We have problems.” “And do you think that it’s respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?” “A lot of questions. Let’s start from the beginning.” “Sure.” “First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. But you have nice ocean and don’t feel now, but you will feel it in the future. God bless —” “You don’t know that.” “God bless you. God bless you. You do not have a war.” “Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel. We’re trying to solve a problem. Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel.” “I’m not telling you —” “Because you’re in no position to dictate that.” “Remember —” “You’re in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel. We’re going to feel very good. We’re going to feel very good and very strong.” “You will feel influenced.” “You’re right now, not in a very good position. You’ve allowed yourself to be in a very bad position. And he happens to be right —” “From the very beginning of the war — “You’re not in a good position. You don’t have the cards right now.” “With us., you start having cards. “We’re not playing cards.” “Right now, you don’t. You’re playing cards. You’re playing cards. You’re gambling with the lives of millions of people. You’re gambling with World War III. You’re gambling with World War III. And what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country — this country — that’s backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.” “Have you said, ‘thank you’ once this entire meeting? No — in this entire meeting, have you said, ‘thank you?’ You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who’s trying to save your country.” “Please, you think that if you will speak very loudly about the war —” “He’s not speaking loudly. He’s not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble. Wait a minute. No, no. You’ve done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.”

 

“Do you disagree that you’ve

had problems bringing people

 

President Trump and Vice President JD Vance scolded President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine during a meeting in the Oval Office on Friday, claiming he was not grateful enough for U.S. aid.CreditCredit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

 

Peter Baker

Updated

Feb. 28, 2025, 2:14 p.m. ET2 minutes ago

Peter BakerWhite House reporter

 

Tempers flare before Zelensky abruptly departs the White House without signing a minerals deal.

President Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on Friday in an explosive televised Oval Office shouting match that ultimately blew up plans to sign a rare minerals deal and signaled a dramatic break in relations between two wartime allies.

 

In a fireworks-filled public confrontation unlike any seen between an American president and foreign leader in modern times, Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance castigated Mr. Zelensky for not being grateful enough for U.S. support in its war with Russia and sought to strong-arm him into making a peace deal on whatever terms the Americans dictate.

 

With voices raised and tempers flaring, Mr. Trump threatened to abandon Ukraine altogether if Mr. Zelensky did not go along. After journalists were escorted out of the Oval Office, Mr. Trump canceled the rest of the visit, including a planned joint news conference and signing ceremony for the minerals deal. A grim-faced Mr. Zelensky then strode out of the West Wing, climbed into a waiting black sport utility vehicle and departed the White House grounds.

 

“I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations,” Mr. Trump wrote on social media. “I don’t want advantage, I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace.”

 

The confrontation left the state of affairs uncertain, but provided a major boost to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who has long sought to drive a wedge between Ukraine and its most important patron, the United States.

 

Even as he shouted at Mr. Zelensky on Friday, Mr. Trump expressed solidarity with Mr. Putin, saying that the two of them had together endured the special counsel investigation during his first term into Russian efforts to help elect Mr. Trump win the 2016 election.

 

The president’s verbal assault on Mr. Zelensky was a remarkable display of anger and resentment toward the leader of a country that has been invaded by a larger power intent on eliminating it as an independent state. No president in memory has ever erupted at a visiting foreign leader in such a vituperous way on camera, not even enemies of the United States, much less a putative ally.

 

Talking over the Ukrainian leader, Mr. Vance told Mr. Zelensky that it was “disrespectful” for him to come to the Oval Office and make his case in front of the American news media and demanded that he thank Mr. Trump for his leadership. Mr. Trump jumped in and told the Ukrainian leader, “You’re not really in a good position right now” and that “you’re gambling with World War III.”

 

“You’re either going to make a deal or we’re out,” Mr. Trump added. “And if we’re out, you’ll fight it out and I don’t think it’s going to be pretty.”

 

Mr. Vance’s eagerness to assail Mr. Zelensky left many observers wondering whether it was a planned ambush or an impromptu tantrum, but it seemed to then prompt Mr. Trump to join in.

 

The result, though, was the blowup of an economic deal that Mr. Trump had prioritized in recent days, a commitment by Ukraine to turn over rare mineral rights to repay U.S. military aid over the past three years. The future of that deal remained unclear.

 

Mr. Zelensky’s hurriedly arranged visit to Washington to sign that deal was meant to smooth over tensions with Mr. Trump, who just last week parroted Russian talking points by falsely claiming that Ukraine “started” the war and calling Mr. Zelensky a “dictator without elections.”

 

With Mr. Zelensky agreeing to the minerals deal, Mr. Trump seemed ready to make nice with Mr. Zelensky by telling reporters on Thursday that he did not remember the dictator comment and expressing respect for the Ukrainian leader. He welcomed Mr. Zelensky at the door of the West Wing on Friday morning with an honor guard, and they shook hands politely but without evident warmth.

 

The encounter, though, quickly turned hostile shortly after they sat down in the Oval Office with journalists present. Mr. Zelensky, dressed in his usual dark, long-sleeved shirt, sought to explain the history of the war with Russia, noting that it went back to 2014 when Moscow first seized Crimea and occupied territory in eastern Ukraine.

 

But Mr. Vance interrupted and began assailing Mr. Zelensky. “I think it's disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office to try to litigate in front of the American media,” he lectured. “You should be thanking the president.”

 

He accused Mr. Zelensky of mounting a “propaganda tour” in the United States. “Do you think it’s respectful to come to the Oval Office and attack the administration that’s trying to prevent the destruction of your country?”

 

Mr. Zelensky tried to respond to Mr. Vance’s assertions  and said that the United States could feel threatened by Russia some day. “You have a nice ocean and don’t feel now, but you will feel it in the future,” he said.

 

That triggered Mr. Trump, who cut him off. “Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel,” he said, raising his voice. “You’re not in a good position, you don’t have the cards right now.” He added, “You’re gambling with World War III.”

 

Mr. Vance jumped back in. “Have you said thank you once?”

 

Mr. Trump’s blowup with Mr. Zelensky contrasts with his assessment of Mr. Putin, whom he has only praised since winning a second term. Just this week, the president called Mr. Putin “a very smart guy” and “a very cunning person.” He said that he believed that Mr. Putin really wants peace, and predicted on Thursday that “he’ll keep his word” if a deal is reached, despite multiple Russian violations of agreements in the past.

 

While he has spoken with Mr. Putin by telephone, Mr. Trump has given little sense of how he expects to negotiate either a cease-fire or an enduring peace agreement. During last year’s campaign, he promised to end the war within 24 hours and to do so even before his inauguration, neither of which he actually did.

 

Since taking office, Mr. Trump has demanded that Ukraine turn over some of its natural resources as payback for military aid provided under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. to defend itself against Russia. While Mr. Trump has repeatedly and falsely claimed that the United States has contributed $350 billion and Europe only $100 billion, in fact, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Europe has allocated $138 billion compared with $119 billion from the United States.

BREAKING: Trump rages at 'disrespectful' Zelenskyy as White House meetin...

US President Trump and Ukraine's President Zelenskyy hold press conferen...

Gene Hackman’s Death at 95 Being Investigated as ‘Suspicious’

Death of Gene Hackman and His Wife Called 'Suspicious'

Marion Marechal appelle à la déchéance de nationalité de Rima Hassan

Bruno Retailleau annonce saisir la justice après les propos de Rima Hassan

Les propos de Jean-Michel Apathie comparant colonialisme et nazisme cont...

Propos Jean-Michel Aphatie : "Il veut créer un sentiment de haine chez les plus jeunes"(A.El Khatmi)

Rima Hassan - "Elle préfère le narratif du Hamas, aux preuves qu’avance Israël" (Gauthier Le Bret)

Djihadisme : L’argument de la vengeance

Riman Hassan : derrière la gauche hamas, la gauche tartuffe

Rima Hassan : "Le Hamas a une action légitime du point de vue du droit i...

"Rima Hassan doit être poursuivie pour apologie du terrorisme" (Christia...

Nouvelle provocation de Rima Hassan : Bruno Retailleau la signale pour la signale pour apologie du terrorisme

WATCH: TYT RAGES About Trump Gaza AI Video

Britain's idle generation: 'What kind of a country allows this to happen...

Press Preview | Thursday 27 February 2025

Why were the Tate Brothers allowed to fly to the US? | DW News

DeSantis says Tate brothers are not welcome in Florida after leaving Romania

Yesterday: Trump flies Tate brothers to the US

Why are the Tate brothers in the US?

 


Why are the Tate brothers in the US?

 

Ian Aikman

BBC News

Published

27 February 2025

 

Controversial influencer Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan have landed in the US after leaving Romania, where they are facing charges including human trafficking, which they deny.

 

Questions remain about why they were allowed to travel and what happens next with their legal cases.

 

Who are the Tate brothers Andrew and Tristan?

Andrew Tate, 38, and his brother Tristan, 36, are dual US-UK citizens who claim to have made millions from their social media empire.

 

Their online output was controversial even before their legal troubles, with the pair attracting frequent criticism over offensive statements about women.

 

The pair have an American father who worked for the US Air Force in Britain. Their parents met in the UK before moving to the US.

 

After their parents divorced, their mother moved to Luton, England. The brothers spent time in the UK, where they built their early careers.

 

Police in the UK have linked Andrew Tate to the "quite terrifying" radicalisation of boys and young men in a 2024 report into violence against women and girls.

 

The brothers were first arrested in Romania in 2022. They are facing separate, unrelated charges of rape and human trafficking in the UK. Both brothers also deny the charges against them in the UK.

 

Who is Andrew Tate? The self-proclaimed misogynist influencer

 

What are the charges against the Tate brothers?

 

The brothers had been under a travel ban in Romania for more than two years while they were under investigation.

 

Speculation that they would leave Romania had been mounting ahead of their journey, after the pair went quiet on social media.

 

They left from a Bucharest airport at around 03:00 local time (05:00 GMT) on a private jet bound for Florida, sources have told the BBC.

 

Prosecutors said the travel ban had been lifted, and the pair's US passports had been returned to them, but investigations into their alleged crimes have not been dropped and they are expected to return to Romania.

 

The Tates have a large US following and are popular figures among some elements of the American right.

 

Earlier in February, some of Andrew Tate's alleged victims said they were "extremely concerned" by reports that US officials had asked for his travel restrictions to be relaxed.

 

It came after US special envoy Richard Grenell raised the Tate brothers with Romania's Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu at the Munich Security Conference.

 

Hurezeanu said he had not considered Grenell's approach as a "form of pressure". Grenell told the Financial Times his support for the brothers was evident.

 

The Tates have been vocal supporters of US President Donald Trump, while his close adviser, Elon Musk, restored Andrew Tate's account on X after he bought the social media platform in 2022.

 

What have the Tates and the Trump administration said about the journey?

Andrew and Tristan Tate have not yet commented on their trip to the US, and neither has the Trump administration.

 

Will they have to return to Romania to face trial?

The cases against the Tate brothers in Romania are now being rewritten by prosecutors, who allowed them to leave the country on the condition that they return - possibly as early as the end of March.

 

The pair's request to leave the country was accepted, prosecutors said, but their request for the charges against them to be dropped was rejected.

 

The brothers face a number of civil and criminal legal cases.

 

They are accused of human trafficking and forming an organised group to sexually exploit women in Romania. Andrew Tate is also accused of rape. They deny the charges.

 

They face separate, unrelated charges of rape and human trafficking in the UK, which they also deny. Last year, a Romanian court ruled they could be extradited to the UK after their case in Romania concludes.

 

A separate, civil case has been opened against the Tates in the US.

 

Separately, lawyers for four women who claim they were assaulted by Andrew Tate said they were bringing a civil case at the High Court in the UK for "damages for injuries they suffered as a result".

 

A representative for the Tate brothers said in response that they "unequivocally deny all allegations".

 

A separate civil case in the UK, which the brothers are contesting, accuses the brothers and a third individual of being serial tax evaders.

 

What has happened to their assets?

The brothers have had their properties, vehicles, bank accounts and company shares returned to them by the Romanian authorities, a spokesperson for the brothers said.

 

A Ferrari, a Mercedes-Benz, and an Audi A5 were among the vehicles released, the spokesperson said.

 

The assets, which were seized by the authorities in the wake of the brothers' detention in 2022, were released following a court appeal led by their lawyer Eugen Vidineac.

 

Some of their assets "remain under precautionary seizure", the spokesperson said, but described the ruling as a "significant step toward justice."

 

What have Tate's alleged victims said?

Four women who allege they were sexually abused by Andrew Tate have said they are in "disbelief and feel re-traumatised" by news of him leaving Romania.

 

In a joint statement, the four said: "It is clear that he will now not face criminal prosecution for his alleged crimes in Romania; he will use it as an opportunity to harass further and intimidate witnesses and his accusers, and he will continue to spread his violent, misogynistic doctrine around the world."

 

They also urged British authorities to "finally take action, do something about this terrifying unfolding situation and ensure he faces justice in the UK".

 

Matthew Jury, a lawyer representing the four alleged victims, told the BBC the Trump administration was "interfering in due process" in Romania and the UK.

 

He added he didn't think the Tate brothers would "ever face justice in Romania now".

"Putin To Keep His Word" Trump Spars With Starmer On Ukraine Security Gu...

There’s ‘something’ wrong with Donald Trump: John Bolton

Former US National Security Advisor Bolton: 'Trump doesn't understand ho...

ITV News asks Trump if he'll apologise to Zelenskyy for 'dictator' comme...

Russian state media praise Trump and the US - and not everyone is happy ...

Trump says Putin would keep his word on a Ukraine peace deal

 



Trump says Putin would keep his word on a Ukraine peace deal

 

President claims presence of US workers in Ukraine would deter Russian aggression after talks with Keir Starmer

 

Pippa Crerar Political editor

Thu 27 Feb 2025 23.42 CET

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/feb/27/trump-says-putin-would-keep-his-word-on-a-ukraine-peace-deal

 

Donald Trump has insisted that Vladimir Putin would “keep his word” on a peace deal for Ukraine, arguing that US workers extracting critical minerals in the country would act as a security backstop to deter Russia from invading again.

 

During highly anticipated talks at the White House with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, the US president said that Putin could be trusted not to breach any agreement, which could aim to return as much of the land as possible to Ukraine that was seized by Russia during the brutal three-year conflict.

 

But, sitting alongside Starmer in the Oval Office taking questions from journalists, Trump refused to commit to deploying US forces to support a European-led peacekeeping force, although he said the US would “always” help the British military in the unlikely event it needed it.

 

He later indicated the US would make “great trade agreements” with the UK that could progress “very quickly”, adding that Starmer had tried to persuade him against imposing tariffs, saying: “He earned whatever the hell they pay him over there.”

 

The US president also appeared to make a significant concession on the Chagos Islands, saying that he was “inclined” to back the deal struck by Starmer, who at the talks delivered a letter from King Charles offering Trump an unprecedented second state visit.

 

The relationship between the two men appeared convivial for much of the meeting, and Trump praised Starmer as “an outstanding person” and “a very special person”.

 

The talks came at the most precarious moment for European security in decades, as the new US administration aligns with Russia, breaking a years-long transatlantic consensus on Ukraine.

 

The prime minister used the meeting, just 24 hours before Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, travels to Washington to sign a critical minerals deal, to push the president on providing security protections for Kyiv in the event of a peace deal being secured to deter Russia from launching another attack.

 

After their bilateral meeting, Starmer said: “We’ve discussed a plan today to reach a peace that is tough and fair. That Ukraine will help shape. That’s backed by strength to stop Putin coming back for more.

 

“I’m working closely with other European leaders on this and I’m clear that the UK is ready to put boots on the ground and planes in the air to support a deal. Working together with our allies, because that is the only way that peace will last.”

 

Starmer stressed that any deal had to be one that lasted, and that was why security guarantees were so crucial. But Trump suggested that keeping the peace would be “the easy part” and the difficult bit was getting the deal done.

 

Trump stopped short of providing a firm commitment on security guarantees, but instead suggested the US having a multibillion dollar stake in Ukraine’s rare earths sector would be enough of a deterrent for Russia.

 

“We’ll be working there. We’ll have a lot of people working and so, in that sense, it’s very good. It’s a backstop, you could say. I don’t think anybody’s going to play around if we’re there with a lot of workers and having to do with rare earths and other things which we need for our country.”

 

Asked whether returning territory seized by Russia could play a part in any peace deal for Ukraine, Trump added: “We will certainly try and get as much as we can back.”

 

The US president appeared to disagree with Starmer’s suggestion that, without a US military backstop, Putin would invade again. “I don’t think so. I think when we have a deal, it’s going to be the deal,” he said.

 

“I think he’ll keep his word. I’ve known him for a long time now, and I think he will. I don’t believe he’s going to violate his word. I don’t think he’ll be back when we make a deal. I think the deal is going to hold now.”

 

However, Trump reiterated his support for the Nato principle of collective defence, saying: “I support it. I don’t think we’re gonna have any reason for it. I think we’re going to have a very successful peace.”

 

He said that the British had an “incredible military” that “don’t need much help” and could “take care of themselves” very well but added that if UK peacekeeping forces came under attack “if they need help, I’ll always be with the British”.

 

Trump also distanced himself from his previous remarks falsely calling Zelenskyy a dictator. “Did I say that? I can’t believe I said that,” he said, before admitting that the relationship between the two men had got a “little testy” over financial support but was now on firmer ground.

 

In a further sign of a healing relationship between the two, Trump praised Zelenskyy as “very brave” and said he got along with him “really well”.

 

He added: “We’ve given him a lot of equipment and a lot of money, but they have fought very bravely, no matter how you figure, they have really fought. Somebody has to use that equipment and they have been very brave in that sense.”

 

A trade deal between the UK and the US, centring on technology, is also on the cards, although British officials suggested this might require further deregulation. Trump did not rule out imposing tariffs on the UK but said he had a “warm spot” for the country, which was in a very different place” from the EU, highlighting his own investments in Scotland.

 

He added that Starmer had tried to persuade him not to introduce tariffs as the two countries had a balanced trading relationship. “We have a very good chance of arriving at a trade deal that could be really terrific for both countries.”

 

In the only slightly terse exchange of the Oval Office session, Starmer pushed back against JD Vance, Trump’s vice-president, after Vance repeated some of his criticisms of a supposed lack of free speech in European countries.

 

Asked about this, Vance talked of “infringements on free speech that actually affect not just the British – of course what the British do in their own country is up to them – but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizens, so that is something that we’ll talk about today at lunch.”

 

Starmer replied immediately: “Well, we’ve had free speech for a very, very long time in the United Kingdom and it will last for a very, very long time. Certainly, we wouldn’t want to reach across US citizens, and we don’t, and that’s absolutely right, but in relation to free speech in the UK I’m very proud of our history there.”

Did Starmer actually get anything for Ukraine from Trump "love-in"?

UK military "is grotesquely underfunded" | Andrew Marr | The New Statesman

Trump Says He Believes Putin Would Abide by Any Ukraine Peace Deal

 



Trump Says He Believes Putin Would Abide by Any Ukraine Peace Deal

 

During a visit to the White House by the British prime minister, President Trump refused to to pledge U.S. military support for a peacekeeping force for Ukraine.

 

Shawn McCreesh

By Michael D. Shear and Shawn McCreesh

Reporting from Washington

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/27/us/politics/starmer-ukraine-trump.html#

Feb. 27, 2025

 

Video

transcript

Trump Says He Believes Putin Will Not Violate Any Ukraine Peace Deal

During a meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, President Trump said repeatedly that he trusted President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia not to violate the terms of whatever peace deal that might soon be reached to end the war in Ukraine.

Reporter: “Mr. President, what would you be willing to do if Vladimir Putin did not?” “If he did not what?” “If he did not stick to the terms of any deal on Ukraine because he has a history of not sticking to his word when it comes to international agreements?” “I think he’ll keep his word, I think — I think he’s — I’ve spoken to him. I’ve known him for a long time now. When we make a deal, I think the deal is going to hold. Now they’re going to have security. You’re going to have security. You’re going to have soldiers. I know France wants to be there. He’s — the president has said he wants to have soldiers there. I don’t think we’re going to even be necessary, but I don’t think there’ll be any problem with keeping the deal with the security.” “If there’s a deal in, we’ve got to make sure it’s a deal that lasts. And that is not temporary — that lasts. And that’s why we need to make sure that it’s secure. And we’ve went in and said, we’ll play our part and we’ve talked, and we will talk about how we work with yourself, Mr. President, to ensure that this deal is something which is not violated because it’s very important.” “It sounds as though one of you completely trusts President Putin, and one of you doesn’t trust him an inch. Have I got that right? Why do you trust him?” “Look it’s trust and verify, let’s call it that. And I think we both can be that way. You have to verify because you never know what’s going to happen.”

 

During a meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, President Trump said repeatedly that he trusted President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia not to violate the terms of whatever peace deal that might soon be reached to end the war in Ukraine.

 

President Trump said Thursday that he trusted President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia not to violate the terms of a potential peace deal with Ukraine, even as he refused to pledge U.S. military support for a peacekeeping force.

 

“I think he’ll keep his word,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Putin as he hosted Britain’s prime minister, Keir Starmer, at the White House.

 

Of Mr. Putin, the president said, “I’ve known him for a long time now.”

 

Mr. Trump’s comments underscored his embrace of Mr. Putin just a day before Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, is scheduled to arrive in Washington to finalize a deal to share revenue from mineral sources with the United States. Mr. Trump has pushed for access to Ukraine’s minerals to make up for billions of dollars in military and humanitarian aid the United States has delivered to Ukraine over three years.

 

In the opening weeks of his presidency, Mr. Trump has ended the diplomatic isolation of Russia, falsely accused Ukraine of starting the war with Russia and repeatedly disparaged Mr. Zelensky, including by calling him a “dictator.” He appeared to change his tune on Thursday, however, predicting that the two of them would have a good in-person meeting.

 

“I have a lot of respect for him,” Mr. Trump said, although he dodged a question about whether he would apologize to Mr. Zelensky on Friday for the “dictator” comment. Earlier in the news conference, when asked if he still thought Mr. Zelensky was a dictator, Mr. Trump deadpanned: “Uh, did I say that? I can’t believe I said that.”

 

Mr. Starmer was the latest in a series of European leaders to come to Washington hoping to reason with Mr. Trump as he pushes for negotiations with the Russians to end the war. Emmanuel Macron, the French president, visited earlier this week.

 

“History must be on the side of the peacemaker, not the invader,” Mr. Starmer said as he stood next to Mr. Trump in the East Room of the White House. The comments were sharper than those by Mr. Macron and other leaders, who have been hesitant to even subtly push back against Mr. Trump when visiting the White House.

 

“The U.K. is ready to put boots on the ground and planes in the air to support a deal, working closely with our allies,” Mr. Starmer said. “Because that is the only way that peace will last.”

 

The British prime minister used the visit to deliver a letter from King Charles III inviting Mr. Trump for a state visit, making it the first time an American president has been offered the honor twice. (Queen Elizabeth II hosted Mr. Trump for a state dinner during his first term.)

 

After opening the letter from the king, Mr. Trump called him “a great, great gentleman.”

 

But Mr. Starmer’s efforts to nudge Mr. Trump in Ukraine’s direction — even with the promise of a historic state visit — appeared not to have not worked. Mr. Trump made no mention of U.S. forces supporting a peacekeeping mission that included British troops.

 

The prime minister’s attitude toward Mr. Putin could hardly be more different from that of Mr. Trump.

 

In the Oval Office on Thursday afternoon, Mr. Trump was asked what would happen if Britain sent peacekeeping troops to Ukraine, only for Russia to renege on a peace deal. Would the Americans come to the aid of the British in Ukraine if Russia went on the attack again?

 

In the span of one minute, Mr. Trump seemed to say no (“They can take care of themselves very well”), and then yes (“If they need help, I’ll always be with the British”), before landing back on no (“They don’t need help”).

 

“Could you take on Russia by yourselves?” Mr. Trump asked Mr. Starmer, with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sitting nearby. Uneasy laughter broke out in the room. Ukraine has felt the consequences of weak security agreements before: In December 1994, it gave up its Soviet nuclear weapons, which were still controlled from Moscow, and the United States, Britain and Russia agreed to respect the existing borders of Ukraine.

 

The agreement proved worthless when Russia seized Crimea in 2014. And while the agreement brought the Ukrainians arms and intelligence support in 2022 at the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, neither Britain nor the United States provided troops.

 

Beyond the diplomatic pleasantries of the day, the two men had been expected to have some difficult conversations about Ukraine’s future and whether a peace agreement results in concessions to Russia.

 

Mr. Starmer was prepared to urge Mr. Trump not to rush into a diplomatic resolution to the conflict without ensuring that Ukraine was given security guarantees that would prevent Russia from invading again.

 

But White House officials said Thursday morning before the meeting that discussions about the deal on rare-earth minerals — which Mr. Trump has said the United States needs — do not include such guarantees.

 

Michael D. Shear is a White House correspondent for The Times. He has reported on politics for more than 30 years. More about Michael D. Shear

 

Shawn McCreesh is a White House reporter for The Times covering the Trump administration. More about Shawn McCreesh

What does the King's letter to Trump say?

 




What does the King's letter to Trump say?

 

The King says the UK and the US have "a vital role to play" - and mentions the president visiting golf courses.

 

Thursday 27 February 2025 22:34, UK

https://news.sky.com/story/what-does-the-kings-letter-to-trump-say-13318305

 

Usually, correspondence written by the King is not made public, but Donald Trump held up the letter in the Oval Office.

 

The letter, which was inviting him to the UK for a historic second state visit, was handed to him by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

 

Here is what we have been able to make out from the photos.

 

In the opening paragraph, the King references the "breadth of challenges across the world", and says the UK and the US have "a vital role to play".

 

Follow live: Trump questioned about Zelenskyy 'dictator' comment

 

He goes on to say that he remembers "with great fondness" Mr Trump's visits to the UK during his "previous presidency".

 

The King mentions Mr Trump visiting the golf course the US president owns in Turnberry and then appears to suggest a visit to Balmoral or Dumfries House in Scotland at some stage - estates owned or run by the monarch.

 

Trump questioned about Zelenskyy 'dictator' comment - and says he will visit UK soon

 

Council's finances teaser

Council finances are becoming unsustainable and whole system overhaul is required, watchdog warns

 

He writes: "There is much on both Estates which I think you might find interesting and enjoy - particularly as my Foundation at Dumfries House provides hospitality skills-training for young people who often end up as staff in your own establishments!

 

"Quite apart from this presenting an opportunity to discuss a wide range of issues of mutual interest, it would also offer a valuable chance to plan a historic second State Visit to the United Kingdom.

 

"As you will know, this is unprecedented by a US president. That is why I would find it helpful for us to be able to discuss, together, a range of options for location and programme content.

 

"In so doing, working together, I know we will further enhance the special relationship between our two countries, of which we are both so proud."

 

After reading the letter Mr Trump said: "That's a great, great honour. And that says at Windsor - that's really something."

 

Mr Trump, the first ever convicted felon to become US president, accepted the invitation from the King - making him the only elected political leader in modern times to be invited to two state visits by a British monarch.

 

Sky News contacted Buckingham Palace to ask when the second state visit might take place and they said: "When diaries allow."

 

Questions remain as to what form the state visit will take, who would accompany Mr Trump in his presidential party and whether this could include his close ally, billionaire businessman Elon Musk who is acting as his senior adviser on federal spending.

 

Mr Trump's first UK state visit took place during his initial term as president - when he was hosted by the late Queen in 2019.

 

Precedent for second-term US presidents who have already made a state visit is usually tea or lunch with the monarch at Windsor Castle, as was the case for George W Bush and Barack Obama.

 

President Trump has earlier separately said he would be visiting the UK in the "near future".

 

The Royal Family's soft power diplomacy is viewed as a way of engaging with the controversial billionaire-turned-politician, who is well known for his love of the monarchy.

 

Starmer contradicts Vance over free speech claims

 

Speaking in the Oval Office, just across from Sir Keir Starmer, Vance said "we have a special relationship with the UK and our European allies, but there have been infringements on free speech".0:39

 

A stay at Balmoral in the Scottish Highlands could be seen as appealing to Mr Trump's heritage - his mother Mary Anne was born on the Isle of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides and he has two golf resorts in the country.

 

Buckingham Palace's ongoing £369m refurbishment is focusing on its grandest state rooms, meaning it is unlikely to host any state visits for the next two years.

 

Balmoral - the turreted grey stone castle by the River Dee - is the King's private Scottish home which has served as a summer sanctuary for generations of monarchs since it was bought for Queen Victoria by Prince Albert in 1852.

 

The only other US president to stay at Balmoral was Dwight D Eisenhower in the summer of 1959, but it was an informal trip rather than a state visit.

 

Mr Eisenhower had an affectionate relationship with the late Queen, who made a last minute decision to drive down to Balmoral's Lodge Gate to personally greet her guest when he inspected a guard of honour.