Move
fast, break things – sprint to kiss Trump’s ring. It’s the tech bros
inauguration derby
Marina Hyde
Zuckerberg,
Musk and Bezos are falling over themselves to suck up to the incoming
president. And he’s just as keen to let them
Tue 14 Jan
2025 16.18 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/14/zuckerberg-musk-bezos-trump-inauguration
Over the
past month, we’ve learned that Donald Trump’s inauguration fund has received
million-dollar donations from, among others, Google, Meta overlord Mark
Zuckerberg, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Apple boss Tim
Cook. Hard to know whether it’s encouraging or quite the opposite to find them
being so public about it. Traditionally when industrialists have made
knee-bending gestures to incoming self-confessed authoritarians, they’ve
preferred to do it in a back room somewhere, rather than on a publicly
available list that also risks implying they like Carrie Underwood’s music.
So let’s
deal first with the entertainers. Underwood will perform at Trump’s
inauguration, having previously insisted it was absolutely impossible to put
her in some kind of ideological box. “I feel like more people try to pin me
places politically,” she mused a few years ago. “I try to stay far out of
politics if possible, at least in public, because nobody wins. It’s crazy.
Everybody tries to sum everything up and put a bow on it, like it’s black and
white. And it’s not like that.” Update: it now is like that.
Also singing
the president-elect into office will be the Village People, which sounds like a
mad idea chucked out at an improv night, but turns out to be a thing that will
actually happen multiple times during the inauguration celebrations. The
Village People confirmed the news in a post beginning with the words “We know
this won’t make some of you happy to hear …”, seemingly at least aware that
this could be viewed as the biggest betrayal of a fanbase since Michael Jackson
claimed he was simply building a fairground to entertain his.
Anyway: to
the organ grinders. Who will run the country while Trump is cheating at golf,
with any number of wingnuts and our post-moral tech bros jockeying for
position? You have to feel almost impressed at Trump for alighting on the only
people who could do a less appealing job of it than him, like Ellen DeGeneres
getting the emperor Tiberius to do her holiday cover.
Even before
it makes landfall, the incoming regime is host to weirder bedfellows than a Mos
Eisley brothel. The likes of would-be health secretary Robert Kennedy Jr was an
environmental lawyer for decades, but his oil-based anger is currently only
permitted to be misdirected at seed oils, while Trump prepares to drill, baby,
drill. Arguably the most eye-catching face-off, however, is the feud between
Trump’s new best friend, Elon Musk, and his old best friend, Steve Bannon, who
days before last November’s election emerged from a federal jail as one of the
few inmates in history to have got less ripped during incarceration. Last week
Bannon declared that Musk was “a truly evil guy … I’m not prepared to tolerate
it any more”. Strong words, if not attached to any discernible levers of
control. Bannon also inquired of Musk, Trump’s crypto and AI tsar, David Sacks,
and the Palantir chair, Peter Thiel: “Why do we have white South Africans, the
most racist people in the world, commenting on everything that happens in the
United States?”
Regrettably
this was not a question answered the next day in a truly spellbinding Financial
Times column by Thiel. To read it was to feel like you were stuck at 2am in the
tightest corner of the house party kitchen with a guy who had done enough
cocaine to float the acronym DISC – the “Distributed Idea Suppression Complex”,
apparently – but sadly not quite enough to immediately fatally overdose.
Meanwhile,
days out from Trump’s inauguration and it feels a little late for Zuckerberg to
be trying to be the fairest tech bro of them all. And yet: the Meta boss is
really, really trying. Last week he announced he would be getting rid of
factcheckers and recommending much more political content across his platforms,
perhaps partly in response to Trump’s previous threat that if he made trouble
for him, Zuckerberg would “spend the rest of his life in prison”.
People talk
a lot about how angry they are that Zuckerberg has shown no backbone, which
means even more when they say it on their Facebook accounts. But even
considering Zuckerberg in terms of principles is a category mistake, like
trying to work out what friction or gravity “believes in”. In retrospect, the
writing was on the wall the second Mark commenced his aesthetic reimagining of
himself. For his frequent Washington committee summonses under the Biden
administration, Zuckerberg used to dress like a boy playing Patrick Bateman in
a middle-school musical version of American Psycho. But last year, something
changed. He’s been de-manscaped and now wears obnoxiously sloganed baggy black
T-shirts and fuck-you watches. Mark’s the only mega-rich person in the world to
have deliberately got himself a glow-down.
Strange to
remember all the batshit plotlines of the past couple of years. Not so long
ago, it was Musk scrambling to retain power over the conversation. “I’m sure
Earth can’t wait to be exclusively under Zuck’s thumb with no other options,”
wrote Elon, who then spent the next 18 months positioning himself as American
democracy’s “other option”. But his angst back then was prompted by the fact
that Meta had launched Threads – too Twitter-like a product, apparently. And so
it was that Elon challenged Mark to a cage fight. Zuckerberg accepted the
challenge, with efforts to stage the fight made by UFC chief Dana White. Who,
inevitably, is now a Meta board member and feature of the incoming president’s
inner circle.
In the end,
though, it ended up being a lot of talk that came to nothing. And on the basis
of all the above and so, so much more … I sincerely hope I’m going to be typing
those words a lot over the next four years.
Marina Hyde
is a Guardian columnist
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário