segunda-feira, 30 de setembro de 2024

Dear Visitors.

 


 Dear Visitors,

A thank you for the faithful continuation of visits to the blog despite the fact that it was temporarily interrupted for a period of 30 days.

The blog has since reached more than 4,000,000 page views.

Thank you very much.

JEEVES/ António Sérgio Rosa de Carvalho.

Editor of OVOODOCORVO

segunda-feira, 9 de setembro de 2024

OVOODOCORVO pauses for a period of 30 days.



 

Les coulisses de l'accord trouvé entre l'Elysée et le RN

Les coulisses du «deal secret» entre Emmanuel Macron et Marine Le Pen

Le Pen denies playing a part in Macron's choice of Barnier as French PM

 


Le Pen denies playing a part in Macron's choice of Barnier as French PM

 

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen on Sunday said she played no part in the appointment of veteran conservative Michel Barnier as French PM, denying media reports that she assured President Emmanuel Macron her party would not back a no-confidence motion to topple the incoming premier.

 

Issued on: 08/09/2024 - 14:52

Modified: 08/09/2024 - 14:54

By:

FRANCE 24

https://www.france24.com/en/france/20240908-le-pen-denies-playing-a-part-in-macron-s-choice-of-barnier-as-french-pm

 

After weeks of dithering, Macron on Thursday appointed Barnier, a 73-year-old former foreign minister who acted as the European Union's Brexit negotiator, as prime minister, seeking to move forward after June-July snap elections that resulted in a hung parliament.

 

But analysts say the country is set for a period of instability, with Barnier's hold on power seen as fragile and dependent on support from Le Pen's eurosceptic, anti-immigration National Rally (RN) party, which is the largest single party in the new National Assembly.

 

A left-wing coalition, which emerged as France's largest political bloc after the elections, although short of an overall majority, is also piling pressure on Barnier.

 

More than 100,000 left-wing demonstrators rallied across France on Saturday to protest against his nomination and denounce Macron's "power grab", furious at his decision to bypass the left and appoint a conservative PM instead.

 

 

Addressing reporters on Sunday, Le Pen, who leads RN lawmakers in parliament, denied media reports that she discussed Barnier's appointment in a phonecall with Macron on Thursday, adding: "I am not Macron's head of human resources".

 

Le Pen said her party would not be part of the new cabinet.

 

Referendum call

A two-time presidential runner-up, Le Pen urged Macron to conduct a referendum on key issues such as immigration, health care and security to give the people a direct vote.

 

The RN "will unreservedly support any approach aimed at giving people the power to decide directly", Le Pen said, speaking in the northern town of Henin-Beaumont, the far-right's traditional stronghold.

 

"Emmanuel Macron himself, in the chaos he has created, has levers to keep our democracy live," she added.

 

Le Pen also indicated she would watch Barnier's every move.

 

"If, in the coming weeks, the French are once again forgotten or mistreated, we will not hesitate to censure the government," she said, adding that she expected France to hold new legislative elections "within a year".

 

"This is good because I think that France needs a clear majority," she said.

 

The left-wing coalition has also vowed to topple Barnier with a no-confidence motion.

 

The alliance wanted Lucie Castets, a 37-year-old economist, to become prime minister, but Macron quashed that idea, arguing that she would not survive a confidence vote in the hung parliament.

 

Competent and likeable

According to a poll released on Sunday, a slim majority of the French are satisfied with the appointment of Barnier as prime minister, but believe he will not last long in his new post.

 

Fifty two percent of people polled said they were satisfied with the appointment of Barnier, according to the Ifop poll for the Journal du Dimanche.

 

By comparison, 53 percent of respondents approved the nomination of Barnier's predecessor, Gabriel Attal, when he was appointed prime minister in early January, becoming France's youngest-ever premier at 34.

 

According to the poll, a majority of respondents see Barnier, the oldest prime minister in the history of modern France, as competent (62 percent), open to dialogue (61 percent) and likeable (60 percent).

 

However, 74 percent of respondents polled believe he would not last long in the post.

 

Ifop polled 950 adults online on September 5-6. The margin of error was up to 3.1 points.

Nomination de Michel Barnier : la réaction de Marine Le Pen

Élections législatives, nomination de Michel Barnier... L'intégralité du...

France’s Le Pen says she will let new Prime Minister Barnier do his job

 


France’s Le Pen says she will let new Prime Minister Barnier do his job

“We don’t wish to cause obstructions,” Le Pen says in interview with La Tribune.

 

"It's undeniable that Michel Barnier seems to have the same position as we do on migration," Marine Le Pen told the French daily. |

 

September 8, 2024 11:41 am CET

By Carlo Martuscelli

https://www.politico.eu/article/france-marine-le-pen-new-prime-minister-michel-barnier-do-his-job-immigration/

 

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen gave her clearest indication yet that she intends to work with the country’s new prime minister, Michel Barnier, in an interview Sunday with La Tribune.

 

“We don’t wish to cause obstructions,” Le Pen said about French President Emmanuel Macron’s choice to succeed the previous premiere, Gabriel Attal, following this summer’s election.

 

Barnier has had a long political career, including as a minister and as a European commissioner, but he made his name as the European Union’s chief negotiator for Brexit.

 

His stance on immigration could prove critical in securing at least tacit support from the far right in parliament. Barnier is in the right-wing Republicans party and has in the past proposed “putting a stop to non-European immigration for three to five years,” a stance close to Le Pen’s own.

 

“It’s undeniable that Michel Barnier seems to have the same position as we do on migration,” Le Pen told the French daily.

 

The far-right leader’s implicit support — or at least non-rejection — matters because of the electoral arithmetic in the new French parliament, which is broadly split among the left, right and center. Macron’s choice of prime minister needs to be able to survive a vote of no confidence.

 

The left-wing grouping, the New Popular Front, has already rejected the appointment of Barnier, with the largest party in the alliance, Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s France Unbowed movement, leveling the accusation that the “election had been stolen.”

Keir Starmer’s summit with European Commission chief delayed

 



Keir Starmer’s summit with European Commission chief delayed

 

Sources fear meeting with Ursula von der Leyen postponed amid Labour doubts about reinstating EU student exchange schemes

 

Lisa O'Carroll Brexit correspondent

Sun 8 Sep 2024 13.55 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/sep/08/keir-starmers-september-summit-with-european-commission-chief-delayed

 

Keir Starmer’s anticipated summit with the president of the European Commission has been postponed amid EU disappointment at the UK government’s continuing caution about reinstating programmes such as the youth mobility and Erasmus university exchange schemes.

 

The prime minister was expected to meet Ursula von der Leyen in the first or second week of September, but sources have said a meeting may now not happen until the end of October at the earliest.

 

EU diplomats said there is “dismay” in some quarters that the UK government was not more positive about the youth and student schemes, saying that showing caution about such low-hanging fruit calls into question hopes for a wider reset of the UK’s relationship with the EU.

 

Brussels sources said they were wondering if Starmer was acting out of an abundance of caution, fearing that pro-Brexit opponents would accuse him of trying to reverse Brexit if he agreed too eagerly to reinstate the programmes.

 

Others said the EU was putting down its own red lines by briefing reporters that a deal on easing travel for musicians and artists was unlikely.

 

Starmer’s one-to-one meeting with von der Leyen was originally planned for 25 July, but a schedule clash ruled that out and both sides said they would try again for late August or early September.

 

It is now expected that the new programme of work on an EU reset will not start in earnest until the spring, with a potential for an EU-UK summit early next year to get the ball rolling.

 

EU sources said they are not concerned about the delay as von der Leyen is focused on getting her new board of management, the EU commissioners, in place.

 

On Wednesday morning she will name her new commissioners but their appointments must then be ratified by the European parliament, which could take a more than a month.

 

The UK’s return to the Erasmus programme would not be without its difficulties as it would possibly involve scrapping its replacement, the Turing scheme.

 

One senior academic said the Turing scheme had the advantage of being global, but its downfall is that it is a one-way programme – it allows UK students to attend an EU university but the British institution has fund their place.

 

If institutions cannot persuade the recipient university to send a student the other way, the UK institution is left with a financial deficit, unlike with Erasmus, where the system was already set up for exchanges.

 

Politicians in the EU and the UK have spoken of their desire to get a scheme up and running that will allow young people to experience other countries.

 

The German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, recently said “The contacts between our societies, between Germans and people in the UK, have declined massively after Brexit and the Covid-19 pandemic. We want to change that; if you know each other very well you understand each other better.”

Starmer braces for rebellion over cut to winter fuel payments

NHS 'broken' says Keir Starmer as report warns children's health facing deadly crisis

'Very dangerous' British prisoner among five to escape from high-security prison in Portugal

"Cutting Winter Fuel Tax Can Lead To DEATH!" Warns Labour MP

Government will 'punish' MPs for voting against winter fuel payment cut ...

Up to 50 Labour MPs could rebel over cut to winter fuel allowance

 


Up to 50 Labour MPs could rebel over cut to winter fuel allowance

 

Dozens said to be considering abstaining from Tuesday’s vote over pensioners’ payments, as PM says dealing with dissent is ‘matter for chief whip’

 

Peter Walker Senior political correspondent

Sun 8 Sep 2024 19.40 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/sep/08/up-to-50-labour-mps-could-rebel-over-cut-to-winter-fuel-allowance

 

As many as 50 Labour MPs could refuse to back the government’s controversial plan to cut the winter fuel allowance, despite Keir Starmer urging back benchers to get behind a measure he has conceded is “unpopular”.

 

While few on the government benches are expected to vote against the policy in Tuesday’s vote, dozens are believed to be considering abstaining or being absent – though rebels say the numbers in their ranks are very hard to predict.

 

After seven Labour MPs had the whip suspended in July for voting for an SNP amendment on the two-child benefit cap, the assumption is that a similar rebellion on Tuesday would bring the same consequences..

 

One Labour MP said: “I’d expect the vast majority of anyone who does rebel to abstain, and remain inside the tent. Abstention is the new rebellion. It’s a question of defining what dissent is, and it’s probably better to do this than to jump off a cliff.”

 

Although there is no chance of the vote being lost, a significant number of absences would indicate the extent of disquiet over a policy that many rebels fear could lose the party votes, and which one MP described as “a shitshow”.

 

Neither Starmer nor No 10 would comment on the potential punishment for rebels before the vote, which was triggered by the Conservatives formally opposing the plan to strip the payment from all but the poorest pensioners.

 

But in his first substantial TV interview since becoming prime minister, Starmer made it plain that he was unlikely to tolerate open dissent. When asked if he would apply the same police of removing the whip from rebels, Starmer told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg: “That will be a matter for the chief whip.

 

“We’re going into a vote. I’m glad we’re having a vote, because I think it’s very important for parliament to speak on this. But every Labour MP was elected in on the same mandate as I was, which was to deliver the change that we need for the country.”

 

A number of Labour MPs, however, argue that the winter fuel decision is different, because of worries about the consequences for many older people and because it was not in the party’s manifesto.

 

Starmer reiterated the argument that the near-£1.5bn annual cost of no longer paying the allowance to all pensioners regardless of income was a vital element in plugging what the government says is a £22bn fiscal hole discovered after they took office.

 

He contrasted the decision with what he said was a Conservative government that had “run away from difficult decisions”.

 

“I’m absolutely convinced that we will only deliver that change – I’m absolutely determined we will – if we do the difficult things now,” he said. “I know they’re unpopular, I know they’re difficult. Of course, they’re tough choices. Tough decisions are tough decisions. Popular decisions aren’t tough, they’re easy.

 

“I do recognise how difficult it is for some people. I do recognise it’s really hard for some pensioners. But of course, they do rely on the NHS, they do rely on public transport. So these things aren’t completely divorced.”

 

He also argued that with the triple-lock policy of pension increases, he could guarantee that the annual increase in the state pension “will outstrip any reduction in the winter fuel payment”.

 

Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said the amount of criticism the policy had received showed the “political pain of it”.

 

He told Sky News: “I’m not remotely happy about it and I’m not remotely happy about having to say to some of my constituents: ‘I’m sorry that I’m going into work this week to vote for something that will take money away from you’. Let me tell you that whether it’s pensioners or anyone else in this country, they won’t forgive us if we duck the difficult decisions now and end up leaving the country with a bigger bill.”

 

Twelve Labour MPs have signed a Commons early day motion, a way to indicate opinion, expressing alarm at the plan, as have five of the backbenchers who had the whip suspended in July.

 

One of the latter group, John McDonnell, said on Sunday that he would rebel again unless ministers set out “a way of managing this that isn’t going to impact upon people in my constituency who are facing hardship”.

 

He told LBC radio: “But if that doesn’t happen by Tuesday, I will vote against. I can’t do anything else.”

 

With cabinet ministers known to be among those worried about the consequences of the policy, one backbencher said the implementation had been bungled.

 

“There was no equality impact assessment, no consultation with charities. And it was announced just before the summer recess. It’s hard to say how many people will abstain – a lot of the new MPs are quite scared of the whips – but everyone is being inundated with emails and letters about this,” they said.

 

There has been speculation that ministers could ease worries by announcing some sort of extra support. But No 10 officials say there is nothing planned beyond the existing extension of the household support fund, which allows councils to hand out some small grants, and encouraging eligible older people to apply for pension credit, which would entitle them to the winter fuel payment.

 

One MP said this would make little difference, saying the household support fund has only a marginal impact, while only about two-thirds of those who could claim pension credit did so, a proportion that seemed unlikely to notably shift.

 

“A lot of people won’t claim pension credit however much you advertise it,” they said. “The form you have to fill in is 24 pages long and has more than 200 questions. The whole way ministers have dealt with this is a shitshow.”

 

Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has the tricky job of addressing MPs at a meeting of the parliamentary Labour party on Monday evening to push home the message about the need for fiscal sacrifices to encourage longer-term growth.

 

It remains to be seen if she will face any open dissent, with many backbenchers, especially those newly elected in July, known to be nervous about the possible repercussions of being seen as rebellious.

 

One backbencher who opposes the policy said, however, that they believed even Labour whips were often privately sympathetic.

 

“They’re getting the same volume of emails and letters that everyone is, or being stopped in the street by people who said they voted Labour and they now feel betrayed. It all feels politically illiterate, and the risk is it will push a lot of people away from us.”

📰 Sky News Press Preview | Sunday 8 September

Overnight protests in Israel calling for a hostage deal and cease-fire

'Netanyahu Killing Hostages ': Israel Erupts In Rage; Clashes In Tel Avi...

Footage shows moments after American woman fatally shot in the West Bank

Biden ‘pressures’ Netanyahu after Israeli forces kill American citizen

domingo, 8 de setembro de 2024

Three Israelis killed in terror attack on Jordan border crossing reported



Jordanian driver kills Israeli security guards at border with West Bank

 


Jordanian driver kills Israeli security guards at border with West Bank

 

Triple shooting on mostly quiet border with Jordan may be indicative of Gaza war spreading violence across region

 

Julian Borger in Jerusalem

Sun 8 Sep 2024 12.16 EDT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/08/senior-gaza-aid-official-and-family-killed-by-israeli-airstrike-on-home

 

Three Israeli security guards have been killed at a border crossing between the West Bank and Jordan when a Jordanian truck driver opened fire on them, in a fresh sign that the nearly year-old Gaza conflict is spreading violence across the region.

 

On the same day, an Israeli airstrike in northern Gaza killed a senior aid official and two women and two children from his family.

 

The West Bank border shooting took place on Sunday at the Allenby Bridge crossing over the River Jordan, also known as the King Hussein Bridge.

 

The Israeli military said: “A terrorist approached the area of the Allenby Bridge from Jordan in a truck, exited the truck, and opened fire at the Israeli security forces operating at the bridge.

 

“The terrorist was eliminated by the security forces, three Israeli civilians were pronounced dead as a result of the attack.”

 

Jordan said it had opened an investigation into the triple shooting and that the border crossing had been closed. According to family members, the gunman was a 39-year-old truck driver who came from the influential Huwaitat tribe in southern Jordan.

 

Israeli reports said the shooting was carried out at close range in a commercial section of the border crossing, where trucks from Jordan and the Gulf go to unload for onward transport into the occupied West Bank and Israel. The border has been largely quiet since Israel and Jordan signed a peace treaty in 1994.

 

In Gaza, the civil defence group, which fights fires and rescues people trapped in rubble, said its deputy director for northern end of the strip, Mohammed Morsi, had been killed in an airstrike. The organisation said four members of his family also died in the bombing of Morsi’s house in the urban Jabaliya refugee camp, north-east of Gaza City. There was no immediate comment from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

 

Israel said it had closed all three of its land border crossings with Jordan and the Israeli army was also reported to have cordoned off the West Bank city of Jericho, which is close to the Allenby Bridge crossing, in case other would-be attackers had already entered.

 

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, described the gunman as “an abhorrent terrorist”.

 

“We are surrounded by a murderous ideology led by Iran’s axis of evil,” he said in a statement issued at the start of a cabinet meeting.

 

There has been a surge in violence in the West Bank, involving army raids on Palestinian towns and frequent and increasing attacks by Israeli settlers. In recent days there has also been a sharp rise in the number of attacks on Israeli settlers and security forces, including two car bombs and one attempted car bombing.

 

The increasing bloodshed in the West Bank comes as the Gaza war enters its twelfth month, with the estimated Palestinian death toll approaching 41,000. The conflict was triggered by a surprise Hamas attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 Israelis were killed.

 

Since the outbreak of the Gaza war, 650 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank amid army raids and settler attacks. About 12 Israelis have died in fighting or attacks there over the same period, six of them in the past eight days.

 

The US, Egypt and Qatar have been trying to broker a ceasefire deal between Hamas and Israel for several months but negotiations are mired, mostly in a dispute over whether, or for how long, Israel can keep a residual force in a strategic corridor along Gaza’s border with Egypt.

Three Israelis killed by gunman at West Bank border crossing with Jordan

Expert Reveals How Protests In Israel Of Netanyahu Are Impacting The Cou...

Edouard Philippe: A 'tone deaf' bid for French presidency? • FRANCE 24 E...

‘Everyone’s mad': Inside crypto’s civil war over the 2024 elections

 


Economy

‘Everyone’s mad': Inside crypto’s civil war over the 2024 elections

 

Crypto industry players are at odds over how to influence races for the White House and Congress.

 

“There's a tremendous amount of emotion right now,” Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith said. “There's an industry strategy, and then there's somebody's individual strategy — and those are sometimes maybe not fully aligned.” | Anthony Kwan/Getty Images

 

By Eleanor Mueller

09/08/2024 12:00 PM EDT

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/08/inside-cryptos-civil-war-00176227

 

The cryptocurrency industry is exerting more sway than ever over U.S. politics.

 

But behind the scenes, cracks are emerging between its left and right flanks over how to influence who will be president and control Congress next year.

 

Democratic crypto lobbyists, executives and investors say the industry is at risk of leaning too far right as its leaders come out in force for GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, who is promising policies that would boost digital asset firms. Their Republican counterparts say engaging with Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and backing her party’s down-ballot candidates risks isolating long-time allies in the GOP, with little to no guarantee it will pay off. The Biden administration has taken a skeptical approach to crypto trading, and it’s unclear what Harris would do.

 

The internal dispute has spilled into view as the industry’s nearly $170 million super PAC effort begins to spend on key races across the country and some crypto advocates seek inroads with Harris. Democratic megadonor Ron Conway abandoned the crypto super PAC network, known as Fairshake, after it announced it would spend millions to unseat Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio. GOP lawmakers, including NRSC Chair Steve Daines of Montana, expressed frustration to crypto executives when Fairshake decided to back Democratic Reps. Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan for Senate races in their battleground states, said a person briefed on the talks who was granted anonymity to discuss private conversations.

 

“There’s a tremendous amount of emotion right now,” Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith said. “There’s an industry strategy, and then there’s somebody’s individual strategy — and those are sometimes maybe not fully aligned.”

 

Nearly a dozen crypto advocates familiar with the conflict said in interviews that the rising tension is creating new hurdles for the industry as it tries to advance a regulatory overhaul on Capitol Hill, which was already a long shot thanks to election-year politics and limited floor time.

 

“Since the [Ohio super PAC] announcement, it’s been a mess,” said one congressional aide granted anonymity to speak candidly. “Democrats are mad, Republicans are mad, everyone’s mad.”

 

It’s not unusual for election-year dynamics to impede bipartisan momentum. But it is notable for an industry itself to be so divided over how to proceed. Even top executives at failed crypto giant FTX contributed huge sums to both parties.

 

“You have about the same number of Republicans as Democrats as independents,” said a crypto lobbyist granted anonymity to speak candidly. “That’s just a unique industry, and it’s causing conflict.”

 

Crypto’s biggest political campaign funders are becoming increasingly outspoken about their personal perspectives.

 

Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Marc Andreessen, whose venture capital firm is a major crypto backer, recently declared Trump “the right choice” for “the future of our business.” Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, co-founders of the digital asset firm Gemini, said they would donate $1 million each to Trump.

 

“The vitriol coming from right-of-center, from very prominent CEOs and investors, has caused a lot of consternation on the left,” said Jonathan Padilla, a crypto entrepreneur who helped launch Crypto4Harris in a bid to rally support for the vice president.

 

The tensions are spreading to Capitol Hill, potentially jeopardizing a surge in bipartisan support this year for legislation that would establish crypto-friendly regulations.

 

Since 71 House Democrats helped 208 Republicans pass a crypto overhaul in May, the issue has taken on a more partisan tinge.

 

Weeks before he became Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio began circulating a crypto regulation proposal that’s unlikely to get traction across the aisle. Senate Agriculture Chair Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) scrapped a committee vote on her own crypto bill after she couldn’t get GOP buy-in.

 

Some crypto advocates are now floating the idea that the industry should curb its push for further votes until Trump is elected and Republicans gain seats in the Senate. Though top Democrats like Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have shown openness to the crypto world’s concerns, the idea is that Republicans will be more reliable allies.

 

“If you think Donald Trump is going to win the election, and particularly if you think the Senate is likely to be under Republican control, why negotiate against yourself?” said a crypto lobbyist granted anonymity to discuss the thinking.

 

Democratic crypto lobbyists and lawmakers warn that it’s short-sighted to go all-in on the GOP. They’re working to make inroads with the Harris campaign and remain hopeful that she’d pursue more supportive policies than has Biden, whose regulators have had fierce clashes with digital asset firms.

 

“Crypto advocates who are also reaching out to Harris don’t believe in putting all the eggs in one basket or in one party,” Crypto Council for Innovation CEO Sheila Warren said. “And I think that is seen as being courageous, or pointless, which is a sad state of affairs, but that’s where we are.”

 

The concern about burning bridges on the left escalated after the crypto super PAC network announced plans to spend $12 million to support Brown’s Republican opponent Bernie Moreno in Ohio’s U.S. Senate race. Brown, if re-elected, would likely chair the Senate Banking Committee next year and have a major say over the future of crypto regulation, making the move a risky bet.

 

“Anyone who cares about the future of crypto should want this issue to stay in the bipartisan lane,” said Rep. Wiley Nickel, a North Carolina Democrat who is trying to connect the Harris campaign with crypto industry players. “Anything less would poison the well for a decade.”

 

Pro-crypto Republicans say it’s naive to hold out hope for Democrats. The party is home to some of the industry’s biggest foes, including Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who warn that crypto trading poses perils to consumers and the financial system. Harris has no clear record on the issue.

 

“I am very concerned that many candidates are changing their tune on the subject for political gains,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis, a Wyoming Republican who’s a prominent crypto booster. She says she’s “very skeptical of Harris’ alleged change of heart.”

 

Fairshake, the crypto super PAC network, has spent large sums on Republicans and Democrats, as it works to secure allies and derail critics. But that doesn’t mean either party is happy. The group, which said it has spent about $75 million of the $169 million it’s raised, declined to comment for this story.

 

Some Democratic donors, including the tech billionaire Conway, have warned that the network’s spending is more broadly geared toward winning GOP majorities in Congress.

 

Republicans are likewise growing annoyed by the super PACs’ support for Democrats, and some see it as a betrayal after years of support. Among them is Daines, the Montana lawmaker leading the GOP’s effort to win back the Senate.

 

“You’re pissing off the people who have promoted the industry, for a political party that has been skeptical at best,” said a GOP strategist granted anonymity to share private discussions. “There’s been conversations [among Republican lawmakers] about, Do you think twice before having a meeting with people in the crypto industry?”

 

Declan Harty and Jasper Goodman contributed to this report.

Venezuela opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez flees to Spain | DW News

House Dems to Trump: prove you didn't take a $10 million bribe from Egypt

Trump will lose according to crucial '13 keys' predictor | Allan Lichtman

Donald Trump reacts to Vladimir Putin endorsing Kamala Harris as next US...

Anger at Putin after conscripts 'surrender en masse' in Kursk | Ian Garner

Putin risks overextension in Pokrovsk after 'mass surrender' of conscrip...

2 years ago: Richard Tice Debunked over Brexit | The Table Debate

The truth about Donald Trump

Europe afraid of ‘American autocracy’ if Trump wins - Anne Applebaum

Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World by Anne Applebaum

Autocracy, Inc.: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World Hardcover – July 23, 2024

by Anne Applebaum (Author)

 

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the Pulitzer-prize winning author, an alarming account of how autocracies work together to undermine the democratic world, and how we should organize to defeat them

 

"A masterful guide to the new age of authoritarianism... clear-sighted and fearless… a masterclass in the marriage of dodgy government to international criminality… (both) deeply disturbing.”—John Simpson, The Guardian • "Especially timely."—The Washington Post

 

We think we know what an autocratic state looks like: There is an all-powerful leader at the top. He controls the police. The police threaten the people with violence. There are evil collaborators, and maybe some brave dissidents.

 

But in the 21st century, that bears little resemblance to reality. Nowadays, autocracies are underpinned not by one dictator, but by sophisticated networks composed of kleptocratic financial structures, surveillance technologies, and professional propagandists, all of which operate across multiple regimes, from China to Russia to Iran. Corrupt companies in one country do business with corrupt companies in another. The police in one country can arm and train the police in another, and propagandists share resources and themes, pounding home the same messages about the weakness of democracy and the evil of America.

 

International condemnation and economic sanctions cannot move the autocrats. Even popular opposition movements, from Venezuela to Hong Kong to Moscow, don't stand a chance. The members of Autocracy, Inc, aren't linked by a unifying ideology, like communism, but rather a common desire for power, wealth, and impunity. In this urgent treatise, which evokes George Kennan's essay calling for "containment" of the Soviet Union, Anne Applebaum calls for the democracies to fundamentally reorient their policies to fight a new kind of threat.

 

The Dictators Who Want To Run The World

The Dictators Who Want to Run the World, with Anne Applebaum (Part 1)

Richard Tice REFUSES to rule out former Home Secretary Suella Braverman ...

Reform UK: Ex-Labour MP CONCERNED over rise of Nigel Farage's party expe...

Labour has started fearing Reform UK

Former UK ambassador Lord Darroch fears Donald Trump victory

Why do so many millionaires 'hate' the United Kingdom? | LBC analysis

“Great Problems In This Country” | Peter Hitchens On The Current State Of Britain

Keir Starmer urges Labour MPs to back ‘unpopular’ plan to cut winter fuel allowance

 


Keir Starmer urges Labour MPs to back ‘unpopular’ plan to cut winter fuel allowance

 

PM refuses to say if MPs who rebel will be stripped of the whip – but makes clear he expects their support in key vote

 

Peter Walker Senior political correspondent

Sun 8 Sep 2024 05.29 EDT

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/sep/08/keir-starmer-urges-labour-mps-to-back-unpopular-plan-to-cut-winter-fuel-allowance

 

Keir Starmer has urged Labour MPs to support his “unpopular” plan to remove the winter fuel allowance for all but the poorest pensioners, saying the government could not run away from difficult choices.

 

Speaking in his first major TV interview since taking office, the prime minister also hinted at increased support for Ukraine, saying his visit to the White House next week to see President Biden would be focused on the “strategic” situation there, and in the Middle East.

 

Asked about Tuesday’s vote on the changes to the fuel allowance, forced after the Conservatives submitted a motion to annul the government’s change to regulations, Starmer refused to say if Labour MPs who rebelled would be stripped of the whip – but made it clear he expected their support.

 

“That will be a matter for the chief whip,” he told BBC1’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. “We’re going into a vote. I’m glad we’re having a vote, because I think it’s very important for parliament to speak on this. But every Labour MP was elected in on the same mandate as I was, which was to deliver the change that we need for the country.”

 

The new government has already suspended the Labour whip from seven MPs who supported an amendment in July to end the two-child benefits cap.

 

Starmer stressed that restricting access to the payments was a vital part of reducing spending he said had spiralled under a Conservative government which had “run away from difficult decisions”.

 

“I‘m absolutely convinced that we will only deliver that change – I’m absolutely determined we will – if we do the difficult things now,” he said. “I know they’re unpopular, I know they’re difficult. Of course, they’re tough choices. Tough decisions are tough decisions. Popular decisions aren’t tough, they’re easy.

 

“I do recognise how difficult it is for some people. I do recognise it’s really hard for some pensioners. But of course, they do rely on the NHS, they do rely on public transport. So these things aren’t completely divorced.”

 

Worries about the impact of the policy change are known to be shared by some cabinet ministers, with some frontbenchers believing the government will have to announce extra support in the budget.

 

Starmer, however, argued that with the triple lock policy of pension increases, he could guarantee that the annual increase in the state pension “will outstrip any reduction in the winter fuel payment”.

 

Starmer is due to be in Washington on Friday for talks with Biden, a trip not yet set out by No 10 but announced by the White House.

 

Asked if this was an attempt to assuage anger among US officials about the UK’s decision last week to suspend some arms export licences to Israel because of risks they could be used in violations of international law, Starmer rejected the characterisation.

 

“You’re wrong about that,” he said. “We’ve been talking to the US beforehand and afterwards, and they’re very clear that they’ve got a different legal system, and they understand the decision that we’ve taken. So that’s very clear.

 

“The reason I’m actually going and having the visit is not about that at all. It’s because the situation in Ukraine is becoming ever more pressing, as is the situation in the Middle East.”

 

The talks with Biden would focus on “the tactical decisions we have to make” on those areas, he added, saying that the next few months would be crucial for Ukraine, as well as in the Middle East.

 

Asked if this could lead to an increase in support for Ukraine, or a decision to allow Kyiv to use donated weapons on targets inside Russia, Starmer said he was “not going to get into a discussion about that on live television”.

 

He added: “But of course, I want to make sure that we give Ukraine the support that it needs for as long as it needs.”

Government will 'punish' MPs for voting against winter fuel payment cut ...

Health secretary says private sector may be used to cut NHS waiting lists

Will Labour Actually Introduce a 4 Day Working Week?

The Dangers of Elon Musk and Donald Trump's Growing Alliance | Pivot

'Distasteful and snarling' Trump braces for 'refined and dignified' Harr...

PM Schoof says Cabinet will not listen to party leaders

 


Sunday, 8 September 2024 - 09:55

PM Schoof says Cabinet will not listen to party leaders

https://nltimes.nl/2024/09/08/pm-schoof-says-cabinet-will-listen-party-leaders

 

It cannot be that the party leaders of the coalition determine what the Cabinet will do, Dick Schoof says in his first major newspaper interview as Prime Minister with De Telegraaf. As a member of the PvdA, he ended up "on the right-wing track" because of his experience as a civil servant at the AIVD intelligence service and the IND immigration authority.

 

"The Cabinet makes decisions. I can well imagine that it will be scrutinized in some cases - especially on very sensitive issues such as the rule of law and migration. But ultimately, it is up to the Cabinet and not individual party leaders or individual ministers to settle this individually with each other," Schoof replied to the question of whether ministers make decisions without speaking to their party leader.

 

There are also "no extra seats at the Cabinet table" for PVV party leader Geert Wilders and NSC party leader Pieter Omtzigt, as the interviewers said. According to Schoof, "These are incredibly dull remarks. In my opinion, they are disrespectful to this Prime Minister. It's really inappropriate to refer to them as if they were in government all the time."

 

About his PvdA period, the Prime Minister said: "I think that because of the different jobs I had, I was already on the right-wing side of the PvdA. And that a great deal of realism came into my life." His period at the IND shaped him in terms of migration. "I saw both sides of the coin. Refugees who had left in real need and ended up stuck here in an asylum system that was completely stuck. Even then. But you also saw the other side: the people who were looking for a better life and were manipulating things."

 

Migration and housing are the points where the prime minister really wants to achieve results. "I also want to try to bring people together a little, see if we can get along a little. People do not intrinsically dislike each other." Schoof advocated not to exaggerate differences in positions. "That is a risk in our society."

 

According to him, a Schoof II Cabinet would be "very strange." "I am a non-partisan prime minister. If this Cabinet completes its term or falls, I will not participate in the elections. I hope to be 71 by then. It would be very strange if they do not find a candidate from their own midst after new elections."

 

Reporting by ANP

The price everyone pays to make Dutch housing unaffordable

 


The price everyone pays to make Dutch housing unaffordable

September 5, 2024 Senay Boztas

https://www.dutchnews.nl/2024/09/the-price-everyone-pays-to-make-dutch-housing-unaffordable/

 

There is one tax benefit in the Netherlands that costs every working person an extra 1.5% in income tax. But it only benefits a certain group.

 

It’s a perk for home owners, and one that many European countries have already  abolished.

 

It’s called mortgage interest tax relief, and it inflates house prices by allowing people to borrow more. (People in countries like the US, notes the economist Matthijs Korevaar, think the Dutch are crazy for their 100% mortgages, Europe’s highest per-household loans.)

 

Benefits around home ownership seem like a perk for the people. But they are really a subsidy for the banks: the taxpayer picks up some of the bill of mortgage payments, so banks can lend more. Higher mortgages benefit nobody more than mortgage lenders.

 

1.5% extra income tax

Pieter Omtzigt gets very upset about the unfairness of the “expat” highly-skilled tax ruling – a ruling that, by the way, exists to allow Dutch businesses to pay lower salaries while recruiting necessary international talent.

 

But, despite commissioning a report on housing that recommended scrapping hypotheekrenteaftrek tax perks to tackle the housing crisis, Omtzigt is remarkably quiet on this. There’s no suggestion the budget will tackle it either.

 

According to a secret government document on the effects of different tax cuts – revealed in a freedom of information request – tax perks for home owners could be abolished and save every taxpayer at least 1.5% in basic income tax.

 

Everyone who is renting privately, or in social housing, in other words, is paying 1.5% extra in income tax to support just over half of the population owning a house.

 

For years, the Netherlands has been asked to get rid of this tax break: by the European Commission, the IMF in its latest financial stability report, the Dutch central bank.

 

Social unrest

Why should homeowners benefiting from the tax break care?

 

Actually, it’s the most unfair tax you could imagine. See your neighbour in that €2 million house on the corner, with the loan of more than €1 million? That person is getting more tax back for his house. The government is literally paying him to be richer and take more risk.

 

It also promotes cavalier behaviour around risky debt. Perhaps you think that only poor people have problematic loans. The Netherlands is now offering 110% plus mortgages – leaving recent buyers up to their necks in debt. Which, by the way, you have to repay even if the house price drops, your foundations need repairing, or you lose your job. A column in the Financieele Dagblad this week rightly said Dutch house prices are “unsustainable” and also a risk for social unrest.

 

It’s also daft to have high debt for a long time. If you read the fine detail of your mortgage, you will be paying back €1.75 for every €1 you borrow on a typical 30 year mortgage right now. That’s a lot of money. With or without a tax break, you are poorer overall with this long-term debt than in paying it off quickly.

 

 

Unsustainable debt

Home ownership tax breaks simply pump house prices. They benefit the richest home owners most. They tax the young – with ever less hope of getting a house – for older generations sitting pretty in theirs. And most of all, it’s tax money that goes straight into the pockets of the banks. Generous of the Dutch people to support their banks so much, of course, although I’m not sure they realise it.

 

Because even if you sell a house, making a profit, you probably still have to buy again – and the highest ever Dutch house prices right now are based not on prosperity and a blooming economy but on a bubble of unsustainable debt.

 

Yes, there are fewer houses than the demand – partly due to immigration but also to Dutch people ageing and living in smaller households, plus most of all, too little building. But with 100% mortgages (and, recklessly, no requirement from mortgage companies for a technical building survey), the prices are determined by what people can borrow.

 

And what people can borrow is pumped by these tax breaks.

 

A genuinely right-wing government would remove the home ownership perk, because it distorts a free housing market. A left-wing one would remove it to tackle social inequality.

 

You could phase it out, or restrict it for houses worth more than the NHG mortgage guarantee limit. You could introduce capital gains tax for private property, to get back some of the taxpayers’ money that has been poured into them.

 

It’s time for the Dutch government to stop blaming other people for the Dutch housing crisis, remove these perks, restrain risky lending and stop the dangerous price spiral.

Dick Cheney publicly backs the Democratic candidate

🚨Trump Has PSYCHOTIC FIT at DISASTER Speech in Wisconsin

Trump forced to abandon swing states due to mounting debts, throwing cam...

Things got HEATED on the Piers Morgan Show!

Trump Family Members Hacked to Promote Apparent Crypto Scam

Trump Family Members Hacked to Promote Apparent Crypto Scam

 


Trump Family Members Hacked to Promote Apparent Crypto Scam

Nikhilesh De

Updated Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 6:04 PM GMT+22 min read

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-family-members-hacked-promote-014525328.html

 

The X accounts of Donald Trump's daughter-in-law and daughter were apparently hacked Tuesday evening to promote a token purportedly tied to World Liberty Financial, the upcoming crypto project touted by family members in recent days.

 

Lara and Tiffany Trump, the wife of Eric Trump and daughter of Donald Trump, respectively, tweeted what they described as "the only official" blockchain addresses for World Liberty Financial. Lara Trump tweeted: Our goal at World Liberty ... is to utilize our governance token on Solana, $WL, to support our DeFi lending protocol."

 

Not long after, Eric, the middle son of former President Trump, posted on X that the two profiles had been compromised and the addresses were a "scam." World Liberty Financial also tweeted: "ALERT: Lara's and Tiffany Trump's X accounts have been hacked. Do NOT click on any links or purchase any tokens shared from their profiles. We're actively working to fix this, but please stay vigilant and avoid scams!"

 

Latest News: In Trump-Backed Crypto Project, Insiders Are Poised for Unusually Big Paydays

 

This is at least the third time a token allegedly but apparently not really tied to Trump – who's curried the crypto industry's favor and votes over the past few months – has been launched.

 

There was a DJT token, which convicted fraudster Martin Shkreli said was launched with Barron Trump, Trump's youngest child, and other developers. No one from the Trump family confirmed whether they had any ties to that project. Another, Restore the Republic, or RTR, also briefly hit a $155 million valuation before crashing.

 

The hacks came hours after CoinDesk revealed details of World Liberty's plans, including the fact that it's a borrowing-and-lending DeFi platform that plans to issue a token called WLFI. The project does not have an official launch date, but the white paper indicated that Donald Trump, who is running for president a third time, will be the "chief crypto advocate." Eric, Donald Jr. and Barron Trump all have roles as well.

Explained: Trump's Weird Crypto Scam! | Bulwark Takes

‘A huge mistake’: Trump’s crypto allies cringe over family’s startup

 


Economy

‘A huge mistake’: Trump’s crypto allies cringe over family’s startup

 

The crypto venture is attracting what appear to be hacks and attempted scams ahead of its launch.

 

By Jasper Goodman

09/06/2024 05:00 AM EDT

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/06/trump-family-crypto-startup-00177566

 

Donald Trump’s sons want to turn their father’s growing bromance with the cryptocurrency industry into the new family business. So far, the project’s troubled rollout has succeeded in creating only one thing: a potential political liability for the former president.

 

Trump’s eldest sons — Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump — have been teasing their plans to unveil a crypto startup called World Liberty Financial for weeks. But the launch has been marred in recent days by a series of apparent scams that have redirected fans to fake pages and compromised the social media accounts of other Trump relatives.

 

The incidents have begun to rattle some of Trump’s allies within the crypto world. They’re warning that his family should shelve a project that they say creates unnecessary political risks and reflects poorly on the industry.

 

“This is a huge mistake,” said Nic Carter, a Trump supporter who is a founding partner at the crypto-focused venture capital firm Castle Island Ventures. “It looks like Trump’s inner circle is just cashing in on his recent embrace of crypto in a kind of naive way, and frankly it looks like they’re burning a lot of the good will that’s been built with the industry so far.”

 

The drama illustrates the risks associated with Trump’s growing embrace of the crypto community, which he’s promised to give a sweeping set of supportive policies if elected. Government watchdogs have also warned the intertwining of politics, policy and the Trump family business poses new conflict of interest concerns as Democrats try to paint him as a “con artist” in the home stretch of the presidential campaign. It comes as major crypto firms face ongoing criticism that the market is rife with scams and consumer abuse.

 

While the details of the Trump brothers’ crypto project haven’t yet been announced, Trump began promoting World Liberty Financial’s forthcoming launch on social media last month after it opened an official channel on the messaging platform Telegram.

 

Shortly after, it appeared that fraudsters began to pounce. The X accounts of Republican National Committee Co-Chair Lara Trump and Tiffany Trump were compromised late Tuesday, when allegedly unauthorized users posted links to a hoax website for the crypto project featuring fake details about it. World Liberty wrote on its official Telegram channel that the accounts were “hacked” and warned against visiting any links from the posts. Tens of thousands of Telegram users have been lured to a separate unofficial channel posing as World Liberty Financial.

 

A representative for World Liberty, Zak Folkman, said in an interview that the group is “building a world-class decentralized finance platform with the absolute best of the best in the industry.” He said the unauthorized X posts and the fake Telegram channel were reported to the two platforms. Folkman confirmed that Lara, who is Eric Trump’s wife, and Tiffany Trump, Donald Trump’s daughter, are uninvolved in the project.

 

“We take security very seriously and put it first and foremost, above anything,” he said, adding that World Liberty works “with the top auditing firms and security specialists in the world.”

 

But experts say the way the crypto project was rolled out left it susceptible to scams.

 

“It’s a very typical playbook of smaller operators or more amateur operations in the crypto space to try to generate a lot of hype before revealing the details,” said Austin Campbell, an adjunct professor at NYU’s Stern School of Business who previously led the risk and portfolio management operation at the crypto firm Paxos. “That makes them susceptible to all sorts of nonsense.”

 

Official details about World Liberty remain scarce. The crypto news outlet CoinDesk reported this week that a white paper for the project describes “a borrowing and lending service strikingly similar to Dough Finance, a recently hacked blockchain app built by four people listed as World Liberty Financial team members.” The Trump brothers’ venture is poised to launch a new crypto token, according to CoinDesk.

 

Folkman, the World Liberty representative, said the startup is creating a “protocol that gives power to the average person to be able to take control of all of the amazing opportunities decentralized finance offers.” He declined to answer specific questions about the service.

 

The early signals haven’t reassured skeptics, including crypto advocates.

 

One crypto industry representative in Washington, granted anonymity because of sensitivities around criticizing Trump, described having “a laundry list of concerns.” A big worry is that that it could reflect poorly on the industry as it pushes for policy changes that would help legitimize the sector.

 

“Maybe it doesn’t move the needle for most people, but if this thing is hacked or regular folks lose money on it or it opens up the door for the SEC to investigate the team, it only looks like it has downside risk,” Carter said. “It looks to have very little upside risk.”