REPORTER'S
NOTEBOOK
The dark, dangerous side of Dutch tolerance
The attempted murder of the crime reporter Peter R. de
Vries is the latest sign of the growing reach of drug gangs.
BY BEN
COATES
July 7,
2021 7:54 pm
https://www.politico.eu/article/the-dark-dangerous-side-of-dutch-tolerance/
Ben Coates
is the author of the books “Why the Dutch are Different: A Journey into the
Hidden Heart of the Netherlands” (Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2015) and “The
Rhine: Following Europe’s Greatest River from Amsterdam to the Alps” (Nicholas
Brealey Publishing, 2018).
GOUDA,
Netherlands — For a journalist to be gunned down in any city would be a
shocking event. But in Amsterdam, famed as the most liberal city in the world,
it feels like an earthquake.
Since
Tuesday evening, when the famous crime reporter Peter R. de Vries was shot in
the head in a busy street, Dutch media and politicians have talked of little
else. This is, after all, a country where crime rates are low, prisons are
being closed because there are not enough prisoners to fill them and the prime
minister usually has no bodyguards and cycles around on his own. Things like
this aren’t supposed to happen here.
In some
ways, though, the shooting feels grimly inevitable. The Netherlands is rightly
famous for its habits of tolerance and compromise — but recently there’s been
growing bitterness in the public sphere, including an increasing number of
threats and assaults against journalists and media outlets.
Last year,
the state broadcaster NOS announced it was removing its logo from its roaming
broadcast vans because “almost daily, journalists and technicians on the road
to report are confronted with verbal abuse, garbage is thrown, vans are blocked
[and] people bang on their sides or urinate on them.”
“It has all
changed so quickly in a short time,” the NOS chief news editor said.
As in some
other countries, it’s also become routine for leading politicians to denounce
the press on a regular basis. Last month, for instance, the far-right
politician and rabble-rouser Geert Wilders tweeted that “Journalists are — with
exceptions — just scum of the ledge,” to which his fellow parliamentarian
Thierry Baudet promptly agreed: “It is so.”
There’s
clearly a huge difference between scorning journalists like this and shooting
them, and many of those who usually enjoy taunting the press have been quick to
condemn this week’s attack. But it’s also clear that the Dutch media climate is
increasingly fraught: According to one government minister, reported threats
and acts of aggression against journalists roughly trebled between 2019 and
2020 alone.
A couple of
years ago, someone even fired an anti-tank rocket at the Amsterdam headquarters
of a crime magazine. Against that backdrop, incidents like this week’s shooting
feel less surprising than they should.
At the time
of writing, De Vries is fighting for his life and police have arrested several
suspects, but much else about the case remains unclear. However, it’s widely
assumed that De Vries was attacked not simply for being a journalist, but
because of his role as a confidant of a key witness in a major drug gang trial
— one of a series of high-profile incidents which have exposed some other dark
elements of Dutch society.
The
Netherlands has been known for its unusually tolerant approach to drugs for
years. Under a policy known as gedoogbeleid, marijuana is technically illegal
here, but its sale and consumption are widely tolerated by authorities,
including in the famous Amsterdam “coffee shops” where people consume a lot
more than just coffee.
For a long
time, the “ban it but tolerate it” policy seemed like a masterful bit of Dutch
difference-splitting: The police were free to focus on more serious problems,
and there was little evidence marijuana use harmed wider society.
The
stereotypical coffee shop in Amsterdam or elsewhere looked less like a seedy
drug den and more like a friendly neighborhood establishment, run by a
cheerfully rumpled proprietor who’d been sitting there for decades.
In recent
years, however, the Dutch drug trade has been transformed. The oddities of the
gedoogbeleid mean that while soft drug use is tolerated, supplying larger
quantities remains illegal. This means that the main source of large quantities
of marijuana is, by definition, criminal organizations.
As demand
for drugs in Amsterdam has soared due to tourism, many of the rumpled old
coffee shop owners have been forced out, and professional criminal gangs have
moved in, running supply networks that are headed by rich foreign masterminds
and stretch across Europe.
Trade in
cocaine, ecstasy and other drugs has boomed, and there have been widespread
reports of new shops and bars being opened purely to launder drug money, as
part of what the Telegraaf newspaper called “a golden age for the Amsterdam
drug criminals.”
In 2019, a
report commissioned by Amsterdam authorities warned that the city had “given
free rein … to a motley crew of drugs criminals, a ring of hustlers and
parasites, middle-men and extortionists, of dubious notaries and real estate
agents.”
“We
definitely have the characteristics of a narco-state,” the chairman of a Dutch
police union told the BBC.
Faced with
such challenges, the authorities in Amsterdam and elsewhere have made repeated
efforts to clamp down, including trying to restrict the sale of marijuana to
foreign tourists. The government itself has even tried to muscle in on the drug
trade, licensing a few legal marijuana growers to keep the coffee shops
supplied.
However,
while some dodgy shops have closed, its effect on the bigger problems seems
limited, and there have been violent gangland turf wars. In 2018, Amsterdam’s
police chief Pieter-Jaap Aalbersberg gave a sensational television interview in
which he complained it was almost impossible to tackle minor crimes because his
force was “dealing with assassinations for 60 to 70 percent [of the time], and
for the rest, mainly with radicalization and terrorism investigations.”
That may
have been an exaggeration, but a visitor arriving in the Netherlands bearing
cheerful clichés about laid-back liberals and endless cycle paths might still
be shocked to open a newspaper, only to read how often hand grenades are left
lying in doorways as threats from one gang to another. According to RTL news,
in one four-month spell in 2019 alone, there were 23 incidents involving hand
grenades being left at homes or workplaces, many of them in Amsterdam.
In some
circles, there’s a tendency to dismiss such incidents as just “criminals
hurting criminals” — and to assume that organized crime is nothing for
law-abiding people to worry about. But that odd cordon sanitaire has also begun
to fray lately, and violent gang disputes have spilled over to affect reporters
and the public too.
In 2016,
the crime blogger Martin Kok was shot dead after reporting on several
controversial cases. Three years later, Derk Wiersum, a 44-year-old father of
two, working as a lawyer in the same drug trial which Peter de Vries was
involved in, was shot dead in front of his wife in a suburban Amsterdam street.
Two months after that, another lawyer narrowly survived a shooting while
walking his dog near the German border. And now De Vries himself, a Dutch
celebrity known for his work exposing drug dealers, kidnappers and others, has
been attacked in broad daylight.
Individually,
these events would be shocking enough, but together they feel like something
worse: a fresh confirmation that there are real threats to the freedoms we
Dutch hold dear. On Wednesday, King Willem-Alexander denounced the latest
shooting as an assault on a cornerstone of the rechtsstaat — using a
hard-to-translate Dutch phrase referring to the constellation of institutions
and individuals that underpin the rule of law.
It’s
important to emphasize that, overall, the Netherlands remains a remarkably
successful and peaceful society. Around where I live, to the south of
Amsterdam, you’re still more likely to run into a dairy farmer wearing clogs
than a vicious drug lord.
But it’s
also clear that although Dutch tolerance brings many delights, it also has a
seamy side. Underneath the country’s pretty façade there’s a dark undercurrent,
which may be getting stronger.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário