America's
Agitator: Donald Trump Is the World's Most Dangerous Man
By
Markus Feldenkirchen, Veit Medick and Holger Stark
February
01, 2016
Donald
Trump is the leader of a new, hate-filled authoritarian movement.
Nothing would be more harmful to the idea of the West and world peace
than if he were to be elected president. George W. Bush's America
would seem like a place of logic and reason in comparison.
Donald Trump
recently spoke about American football. No other game more fully
embodies his country's character. The sport is about capturing
territory, and players need to be tough and fearless to win. A player
who is afraid of being tackled by someone from the opposing team
while running has already lost the game. "I don't even watch it
as much anymore," Trump told a crowd of his supporters in Reno,
Nevada. "The whole game is all screwed up."
A growing number of
studies point to the devastating consequences of the many tackles in
the game, in which players try to stop their opponents by throwing
themselves at them head-first: brain trauma, depression, suicide. New
rules have been created, and there are now stiffer penalties for the
most glaring fouls.
On the stage in
Reno, Trump said he missed "what used to be considered a great
tackle, a violent head-on tackle." He slammed his fists together
and repeated himself, vulgarly pursing his lips as he said the word
"violent." "You used to see these tackles and it was
incredible to watch, right?"
And today? "Bing!
Flag!" Trump shouted. "The referees, they want to all throw
flags so their wives see them at home."
"Football has
become soft," he said, repeating the sentence as if it were a
key hypothesis on the state of the nation. "Football has become
soft like our country has become soft!" As he held up his index
finger, the crowd cheered and people held signs up in the air that
read: "The silent majority stands with Trump."
Trump Wants A
Ruthless America
"Believe me,
I'll change things. And again, we're going to be so respected. I
don't want to use the word 'feared,'" he told the audience. But
that is precisely what Trump wants: to be feared. His bid for the
White House, long ridiculed, is a fight for a ruthless, brutal
America. Behind his campaign slogan "Make America great again!"
is the vision of a country that no longer cares about international
treaties, ethnic minorities or established standards of decency.
Trump wants to
attack head-first again. The 69-year-old embodies a new harshness and
brutality, and both a physical and emotional crudeness. Trump has
launched an uprising of the indecent, one that is now much bigger
than he himself, a popular movement of white, conservative America
that after eight years under Democratic President Barack Obama,
yearns for a leader who will usher in the counter-revolution.
Former Obama
campaign manager David Axelrod wrote recently that Trump's success is
based on the same principle as the campaign victories of his former
boss. In fact, he added, he had explained this recipe for success to
Obama himself when he first ran for president: When a president
leaves office after eight years, voters tend to prefer a candidate
who is as different as possible from the incumbent, in terms of
politics, character and habits.
By that logic, Obama
the integrator, who fought against discrimination against blacks and
gays, would be followed by a President Trump who stirs up hatred
against minorities and claims that "political correctness"
is the greatest threat to the United States. While Obama sought to
explain complex problems, often sounding like an intellectual in the
process, studies have shown that Trump speaks at a fourth-grade
reading level. Problems, according to Trump, are "totally easy"
to solve. And while Obama appealed to the common "we" in
his campaign slogan "Yes, we can!" Trump's version reads
"Yes, I can!" -- the solution of a strong leader.
Currently, America
is running the risk of falling for a self-proclaimed leader with a
low opinion of fundamental democratic values. Shortly before the Iowa
Caucuses on Monday, all national polls showed Trump as the leading
Republican candidate by a wide margin. He is also polling at the top
of the Republican field in almost every state in the country. In Iowa
itself, with its large religious population, the race could end up
being a close contest between Trump and Texas Senator Ted Cruz, a
Christian hardliner.
Desire for a Strong
Man at the Top
Trump takes every
opportunity in this campaign to portray his country as a down-and-out
weakling. According to his strategy, when a nation's feeling of
self-worth has hit rock bottom, it experiences a growing desire to
overcome the "status quo" -- and for a strong man at the
top.
Trump is a unique
figure. He is so wealthy that his campaign is almost entirely
self-financed. Thanks to his colorful life as a New York real estate
mogul and star of the reality TV show "The Apprentice," he
enters the presidential race with a celebrity factor like no other
candidate before him.
But his most unique
characteristic is his lack of scruples. When speaking about his
amiable rival Jeb Bush, he has often said that Bush is such a
"low-energy person" that no one can even look at him
anymore without seeking signs of his lack of energy. Trump has
repeatedly said that Marco Rubio, another Republican contender,
"sweats a lot," which, according to Trump, would be a
little embarrassing for a president who has to negotiate with "strong
leaders like Vladimir Putin." He recently began claiming that
his strongest rival at the moment, Ted Cruz, lacks the legal
qualification to become president because he was born on Canadian
soil. And last year he tweeted: "If Hillary Clinton can't
satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?"
All of this profanity and scrupulousness would have forced anyone
else to resign. But for his millions of supporters, they are further
evidence of Trump's boldness and strength.
"I could stand
in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose
any voters, okay?," Trump said at a rally in Iowa a week ago
Saturday. He mimicked shooting a pistol with his finger and added:
"It's like, incredible!"
No Longer the
Laughing Stock
Salon.com wrote:
"(Trump) embodies that well-worn if still stinging observation
about the country he hails from: that 'America is the only country
that went from barbarism to decadence without passing through
civilization.'"
Trump announced his
candidacy just over seven months ago. Since then, much has been
written and said about his hairstyle. His plain and sometimes
embarrassing statements, his muddled speeches and his
incomprehensible narcissism have been a source of amusement. There
are lists of the most outrageous statements Trump has made in the
past, such as this one about women: "You know, it doesn't really
matter what (the media) write as long as you've got a young and
beautiful piece of ass."
But his candidacy
ceased to be amusing long ago. Trump's demands are too extreme for
that, and his view of the world and humanity too dangerous. And the
chances are too great that he will be named as the Republican
presidential candidate. Some polls show that Trump even stands a
realistic chance of winning the White House in a possible face-off
with Hillary Clinton. The combination of his views and the
possibility that he could soon hold the planet's most powerful office
make him the most dangerous man in the world at the moment.
For a long time,
neither Republican Party officials nor the media recognized the true
dimensions of the movement that Trump was forming. They continued to
poke fun at him, even as he was creating a revolutionary mood on the
right margin of society. Now it could be too late, and Trump could be
the one getting the last laugh.
Like it or not, it
is time to take Donald John Trump seriously. So what can be said
about the character of this man who is determined to capture the
White House? And what could America and the rest of the world expect
if he truly became the 45th president of the United States?
Fascist
Characteristics
New Yorker writer
George Packer's book "The Unwinding" describes the gradual
economic and, more importantly, moral decline of the United States.
It is perhaps the most astute book about the country's condition
today. Sitting at Lafayette Grand Café & Bakery in Manhattan's
Greenwich Village, Packer says that Trump now exhibits several of the
characteristics of a fascist.
In the past, as a
reality TV star, Trump had to come across as somewhat likeable, says
Packer. But now that he is playing the fascist, he suddenly resembles
one, with his grim face, his pursed lips and the threatening and
intimidating look in his eyes.
It's no accident
that Trump expresses great admiration for Russian strongman Vladimir
Putin, who seems to impress him far more than politicians seeking to
champion the values of democracy with their painstaking and often
vain search for compromises.
"He is a nicer
person than I am," Trump said of the Russian president. "In
terms of leadership, he's getting an A." The reason, according
to Trump, is that Putin is "making mincemeat out of our
president."
Putin returned the
compliment in December, when he said: "He's a really brilliant
and talented person, without any doubt. He is the absolute
front-runner in the presidential race." Trump, who judges people
purely by whether or not they praise him, promptly shot back: "When
people call you brilliant, it's always good, especially when the
person heads up Russia."
Inflaming Tensions
Packer says many
Europeans are currently looking at Trump's success and thinking:
"Those Americans are crazy!" But Trump isn't some strange
US mutation, says Packer, who instead sees him as being evocative of
European right-wing populists, à la Marine Le Pen in France and
Viktor Orbán in Hungary.
While politicians
like Le Pen and Orbán inveigh against "Brussels," Trump
rails against "Washington" as the symbol of a degenerate
political system "that doesn't get things done anymore."
Just like his European counterparts, Trump is calling for isolation
in the form of protective tariffs, entry bans and border walls. He
inflames tensions against ethnic minorities and offers anxious
citizens the authoritarian vision of a strongman who will solve all
problems on his own -- while ignoring democratic conventions. Trump
is presumably only the shrillest and most prominent embodiment of a
trend that is becoming pervasive throughout the Western world.
Packer sees the 2008
financial crisis, which caused parts of the US economy to unravel and
deprived millions of Americans of their economic foundation, as the
main reason many Americans are receptive to a man like Trump. The
economy has been growing again since then, but in absurdly unfair
ways, says Packer, as inequality becomes more and more glaring.
According to Packer, many Americans feel they have been left alone
with their concerns, and they feel disconnected and betrayed.
The current primary
race underscores how much this frustration has already changed the
country. It has enabled Bernie Sanders, an extreme leftist by
American standards, to become a serious threat to Hillary Clinton.
And it is preparing the ground for Trump's campaign against all the
elites, even though Trump himself has spent his entire life as a
member of the country's economic elite.
Many Americans,
especially whites and those with relatively little education, are now
more receptive than ever to audacious promises and simplistic
solutions. But they are also receptive to a form of politics that
blames immigrants and minorities for their own fate, and for the
race-baiting that has been part of every authoritarian movement to
date. Trump offers all of these things, and he offers them more
skillfully, professionally and self-confidently than all other
candidates.
'It's a Miracle
Trump Didn't Invent the Selfie'
Michael D'Antonio is
sitting in an Applebee's fast-food restaurant on Long Island,
speaking quietly. He's a cheerful, thoughtful man with a white beard,
the polar opposite of Trump. D'Antonio has delved a lot deeper than
most others into Donald Trump's world.
D'Antonio recently
wrote a biography of Trump, who was enthusiastic about the project
and gave his cooperation -- at least initially. Trump granted the
author several interviews, which were usually held in his penthouse
inside the Trump Tower, behind the kinds of double doors that would
normally be used in castles. D'Antonio was granted free access to
Trump's family and associates, and spoke with his grown children and
all three of his wives. But when Trump realized that D'Antonio was
also one of his critics, he immediately canceled the project.
"What I noticed
immediately in my first visit was that there were no books,"
says D'Antonio. "A huge palace and not a single book." He
asked Trump whether there was a book that had influenced him. "I
would love to read," Trump replied. "I've had many best
sellers, as you know, and 'The Art of the Deal' was one of the
biggest-selling books of all time." Soon Trump was talking about
"The Apprentice." Trump called it "the No. 1 show on
television," a reality TV show in which, in 14 seasons, he
played himself and humiliated candidates vying for the privilege of a
job within his company. In the interview, Trump spent what seemed
like an eternity talking about how fabulous and successful he is, but
he didn't name a single book that he hadn't written.
"Trump doesn't
read," D'Antonio says in the restaurant. "He hasn't
absorbed anything serious and profound about American society since
his college days. And to be honest, I don't even think he read in
college." When Trump was asked who his foreign policy advisers
were, he replied: "Well, I watch the shows." He was
referring to political talk shows on TV.
In all of the
conversations about his life, Trump seemed like a little boy, says
D'Antonio. "Like a six-year-old boy who comes home from the
playground and can hardly wait to announce that he shot the decisive
goal."
According to
D'Antonio, American society revolves around two things: ambition and
self-promotion. This is why Trump is one of the most appropriate
heroes he can imagine for the country, he adds, noting that no one is
more ambitious and narcissistic. "It's a miracle Trump didn't
invent the selfie."
The Dark Side of
Trump's Narcissism
During an appearance
two weeks at a Toyota dealership in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, a
young woman in the crowd said she had two questions for Trump. The
first one was about the college financing system. Trump's reply
contained the word "college," at any rate. This was her
second question: "Can I take a selfie with you?" The owner
of the dealership felt that the question was inappropriate and
quickly said that perhaps she could do it later. But Trump was
already saying "Of course! Of course!" and waved the woman
onto the stage.
His biographer talks
about the dark sides of Trump's self-absorption. "Trump lacks
any self-irony, any form of critical self-perception." The
entire family is like that, he explains. When he tried to joke with
Trump's children about their father's penchant for gold and glitter
in his buildings, none of them understood what he was getting at.
"They don't notice when something is ridiculous," says
D'Antonio. "This is the most telling characteristic of the
entire Trump clan: the persistent denial of reflection."
But what worried him
the most, says D'Antonio, is Trump's belief that he is genetically
superior to most people in the world. In all of their conversations,
he notes, Trump kept returning to the notion that by virtue of his
birth, he is simply better than other people in many areas -- from
playing golf to being a businessman. "I'm a big believer in
natural ability," Trump said.
His son, Donald
Trump Jr., shares his father's conviction. He said he was a firm
believer in the concept of breeding, in "race-horse theory."
Then he pointed at the ceiling with his finger, in the direction of
his father's office. "He's an incredibly accomplished guy, my
mother's incredibly accomplished, she's an Olympian, so I'd like to
believe genetically I'm predisposed to (be) better than average."
Apparently this sort
of belief also helps Trump portray himself to voters as a strong man,
as the person who will save the country.
A Core Element of
Racism
In early January,
the stadium at Winthrop University in Rock Hill, South Carolina, was
filled with 6,500 Trump supporters. Rose Hamid, a Muslim woman,
waited for the right moment to express her opposition to Trump. Hamid
and her friends chose a spot in the bleachers, directly behind the
lectern. They had planned to stand up when Trump said something
hateful. When he began railing against Syrian refugees, Hamid pulled
out a yellow Star of David with the word Muslim printed on it and
stuck it to her T-shirt. She stood up and folded her hands. Her
Jewish friend also rose to her feet, and they both stood there, in
silent protest against the stigmatization of religions.
The crowd erupted
into indignation within seconds. Trump's fans stuck their fists in
the air and drowned out Hamid, as if she were a criminal, shouting
"Trump! Trump!" Then Trump signaled to the security guards
to remove Hamid from the room. She didn't resist. Since the incident,
however, she has known what it feels like to be chased away by Trump
and his supporters.
A few days later
Hamid, 56, is sitting in a row house in a suburb of Charlotte, North
Carolina, talking about the January evening when Trump had her
escorted out. Hamid is a proud Muslim woman who wears a headscarf,
even while working as a flight attendant, and she has never been
criticized for it. She was raised Catholic and converted to Islam in
her mid-20s. A copy of the Ten Commandments sits on her bookshelf and
a verse from the Koran hangs on the wall. She believes in the
diversity of religions. That was what she wanted to say to Trump when
she heard he was coming to her area.
At first Hamid, like
many others, didn't take Trump seriously. But this changed when
Trump, after the attacks in Paris, proposed the establishment of a
database of all Muslims in the country. He later called for a
"complete shutdown of all Muslims entering the United States
until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."
It seems to trouble neither Trump nor his supporters that the First
Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of
religion.
Racism has since
become a core element of his campaign, but it has only intensified in
recent months. At first, Trump was only talking about the need to
stop illegal immigrants. Only when he realized that this was what got
him the most applause did he become more radical. In June, he said
that Mexico is "bringing drugs, crime and rapists" to the
United States, and that he would "build a great, great wall on
our southern border," and "I will have Mexico pay for that
wall!" He also announced that he would deport all 11 million
illegal immigrants within two years. For his fans, Trump's "great,
great wall," which he compares with the Great Wall of China, has
become a symbol of a well-fortified America.
Goading and Ridicule
Almost every
evening, Trump goads his supporters to shout down protestors or throw
them out of his rallies. He often ridicules these individuals from
the lectern. If one of them happens to be on the heavy side, he pokes
fun at "that fat guy," which fans interpret as a signal --
that Trump won't mind if they get a little physical with the
protester.
When a TV host
recently asked Trump, who was sitting with his back to his fans,
whether he was serious when he said that he would also "take
out" the wives and children of terrorists, Trump replied: "We
have to be more vigilant, and we have to be much tougher." The
crowd behind him cheered. At a rally in Las Vegas a few weeks ago,
his supporters attacked a black protester, while others shouted
"shoot him," "Sieg Heil" and "light the
motherfucker on fire!"
These are the
moments when it becomes clear how brutal Trump can be. Trump
biographer D'Antonio learned that Trump had always sought out
bodyguards who looked like hoodlums and thugs -- to put the fear of
God in people.
"I tried to
look Trump's supporters in the eye, but it was impossible," says
Rose Hamid. "There was a strange emptiness there." Trump is
changing the country and its people, she adds, and the other
candidates, faced with his poll numbers, are revising their own
rhetoric. Indeed, this is what worries Hamid. "Trump emboldens
people to step out of their shoes and do things they normally
wouldn't dare to do."
A study by pollster
Matthew MacWilliams shows that what Trump's supporters have in
common, more than anything else, is the desire for authority.
MacWilliams asked people whether they preferred a respectful,
obedient and well-behaved child or an independent and curious one.
Those who tend to favor the former are seen as being authoritarian.
Trump was the only candidate strongly favored by the respondents with
authoritarian ideas.
This group offers
tremendous potential for Trump, says MacWilliams, noting that not
only 49 percent of Republicans but also 39 percent of independent
voters showed a penchant for the authoritarian. "Trump's support
is firmly rooted in American authoritarianism and, once awakened, it
is a force to be reckoned with," MacWilliams recently wrote on
the website Politico.
It makes sense that
Trump doesn't seem to care much about freedom of religion or other
cornerstones of democracy. In his rhetoric, he could hardly be more
contemptuous of the Congress in Washington. Freedom of the press also
seems to annoy him. And before every event, he has his announcer
point out that he respects free speech "almost as much" as
the right to bear arms.
On some evenings,
Trump even has potential audience members questioned about their
views. Before his appearance in Burlington, Vermont, a security
official dressed in black stood in the lobby and asked every visitor:
"Are you a supporter of Mr. Trump?" Those who said no or
were undecided were turned away, even if they had tickets to the
event. In a democracy, an election campaign is supposed to be an
opinion-forming process. But in Trump's case, people are either for
him or they are thrown out.
Trump uses the term
"the lying press," now famous in Germany, at all of his
appearances. "The liars are back there," he says to his
supporters, pointing to the corner where the cameras are. At his
events, journalists are herded together into a fenced area, under the
watchful eyes of zealous guards. The biggest paradox of this campaign
is that Trump, while sharply berating the media, is the one who
benefits the most from the coverage it provides him. The major TV
networks devote more airtime to him to Trump than to all his rivals
combined. He is the only Republican candidate who provides the
networks with the ratings they crave, and yet he is also the one who
mocks them for that very mechanism.
His last-minute
refusal to participate in a televised debate hosted by the right-wing
Fox News network last week, because he felt unfairly treated by Megyn
Kelly, one of the moderators, is not only a first in the history of
American election campaigns. It is also the latest climax in the game
Trump is playing with the media.
What To Expect from
a President Trump
What would America
look like with a man like this at the helm? And what could the world
expect from a President Trump? He has yet to present a comprehensive
platform for his presidency. The constant questions about content
annoy Trump, and he would prefer it if people would simply trust him.
Trump often complains that it's always the journalists who ask
questions about his policies. He claims voters don't care very much
about that sort of thing. Where others have strategy papers, Trump
has his gut feeling. Nevertheless, something resembling an agenda can
be deduced from his interviews and speeches.
If we take him at
his word, the United States will soon be surrounded by a high wall.
The country will only be able to engage in limited trade, because the
tariffs will be so high. Eleven million immigrants will have left the
United States in cloak-and-dagger operations. The days of the United
States as a country of immigrants would be over, once and for all.
Those who have
experienced this man's temperament know just how thin-skinned and
aggressive Trump can be when criticized or provoked, and how
mercilessly and excessively he pursues revenge. One shudders to think
what could happen if a man like that had his finger on the button of
the largest nuclear arsenal in the world. "An ally, let's say
from Europe, who didn't follow him into war would be considered a
traitor by Trump and would have to expect massive retribution,"
D'Antonio believes.
If there's a basic
idea behind Trump's campaign, it's his own leadership strength. "We
will have so much winning if I get elected that you may get bored
with winning," Trump has pledged. "I have so much energy,
it's almost ridiculous." He seems to want to govern in the same
way that he became a billionaire -- despite a few bankruptcies along
the way.
Although he
previously held liberal positions on some divisive issues, like
weapons possession and abortion, he is now presenting himself as a
firm opponent of abortion and a huge fan of guns. He's raised other
reasonable ideas in the past as well: He once called for a
government-financed healthcare system that would be accessible for
everyone. He also advocated for a tax on the super rich to reduce US
government debt. Indeed, his Republican opponents have been reminding
the public of these statements in the form of video clips aimed at
damaging the candidate. They include sentences like, "I probably
identify more as Democrat." For his part, though, Trump acts as
if this past never even existed. He presents his new,
ultraconservative positions in the most populist of ways and with
even greater determination.
An Odd Worldview
Trump the
entrepreneur does business all around the world. Ironically, however,
as president he would limit any free trade not conducted according to
his own rules. In order to shrink the trade deficit with China, he
proposes imposing high punitive tariffs on Chinese exports to the US.
He promises to bring back all the American jobs that have been lost
to Asia or Mexico as a result of globalization. Voters are expected
to trust that Trump will be as effective a diplomatic negotiator as
he was a business negotiator. "I will be the greatest jobs
president that God has ever created," Trump boasted last summer.
His foreign policy
essentially boils down to a bizarre mix of isolationism and a
simultaneous show of superiority through a military build-up. "I'm
the most militaristic person there is," Trump says.
When it comes to
international politics, Trump prefers to rely on his own personal
experiences and impulses than on textbooks. For example, he doesn't
consider North Korea to be an American problem, but rather one which
China must solve. He offers a similar approach for addressing the war
in Syria, where he feels the problems should be dealt with locally
and that there is no need for intervention.
Trump nevertheless
says he wants to "bomb the hell out of" the Islamic State
(IS), or as his newly won endorsee Sarah Palin expressed on stage
just over a week ago, he would send American "warriors" to
"kick ISIS's ass." To accomplish that, Trump claims he
wants to give US generals free hand, saying they already know what
needs to be done. What Trump hasn't revealed, unfortunately, is how
alliances are even supposed to be forged with Muslim countries
against the Islamic State by a United States that places Muslims
under a state of general suspicions and refuses to allow them to
travel into the country as he has proposed doing.
Trump has announced
he will take a hardline approach on terrorists, but he also says he
doesn't want to be interventionist. His gut feeling is that Americans
will reject interventions with uncertain outcomes. During his
campaign, he has often repeated the fact that he heavily criticized
the Iraq war in 2003. The way things look right now, the world is
going to have to brace for a US foreign policy based on gut feelings.
Is There any
Stopping Trump?
The question now is
whether such a political course, and indeed a President Donald J.
Trump, can even still be prevented. And who could stop him? The
possibilities include the Republicans themselves, a party Trump seems
to work with based on his mood or whim. And then, of course, there
are the Democrats, whose probable candidate, Hillary Clinton, Trump
will likely have to square off against in the main election. But
neither side can be fully trusted to defeat Trump.
Never before has the
grand, time-honored Republican Party been as helpless and hapless as
it is right now. The party's leadership had sought an establishment
candidate like Jeb Bush or the younger Marco Rubio. But Trump?
"We are in
total chaos," says Peter Wehner, a former speechwriter for
George W. Bush. He says the Republicans are already divided and that
a Trump candidacy could spell the end of the Grand Old Party. When
Wehner talks about Trump, it sounds as if he's referring to the head
of some dictatorship. "Trump is erratic. He is emotionally
unstable, has authoritarian tendencies and a certain cruelty. He is a
toxic figure, a demagogue. Trump would cause a lot of damage to the
Republican Party. If he won the nomination it would be a hostile
takeover. We must prevent it."
Some already view
Trump as the founder of a new political movement -- "Trumpism"
-- that has little in common with the traditional conservatism on the
right.
The level of
frustration among many Republican officials was on display in
mid-January during a speech given at an internal meeting of party
leaders in South Carolina by Holland Redfield, a member of the
Republican National Committee, who said the GOP was being "almost
terrorized" by Trump and that "there is a limit to
loyalty."
The question being
discussed the most right now within the party is what the GOP's
response should be if Trump wins the first primaries. Should he be
embraced in order to share in the success? Or should the party take a
more hostile approach in the hope that a more reliable candidate may
ultimately prevail?
Currently, the
faction that views Trump as representing the downfall of conservatism
is dominating. Strategy papers are being circulated within the party
addressing how officials should counter Trump's arguments. The
National Review, a respected conservative political magazine, even
published a plea to prominent Republicans under the headline,
"Against Trump."
Is the Tide Turning
in Trump's Favor?
Within the party
base, however, there are a growing number of voices reminding that
America is the country of freedom and that politics is an open
competition. "If Trump is able to gather the most votes for
himself, then he should also be our candidate," says Congressman
Mick Mulvaney. Mulvaney is a Rand Paul backer, but he considers the
will of the party base to be crucial.
Inside the party,
there's growing sentiment that Trump might stand a good chance even
against Hillary Clinton. "In the same way that Reagan brought
renewal to the Republican Party and made it electable for Democrats,
I think there are many conservative Democrats who would support
Trump," says Jeffrey Lord, a former White House aide to Reagan.
The more influential
Republicans are still keeping a low-profile right now, but if you
speak to men like Newt Gingrich, it sounds like the Republicans will
ultimately fall into line with Trump. During the 1990s, Gingrich led
the Republicans in the House of Representatives and launched the
"Republican Revolution." In 2012, he also ran as a
Republican candidate in the primaries, though his campaign was
ultimately a flop. Last week, on his way to Iowa, Gingrich gave
SPIEGEL a short interview as he waited to catch his flight.
Gingrich still has a
clear recollection of Trump asking to meet with him in January 2015.
The two had breakfast together in Des Moines on the sidelines of an
event they were attending in the city. Trump spoke for the first time
about his idea to run. Gingrich believes people underestimate Trump.
He tells a story of the ice skating rink in New York's Central Park
in order to illustrate Trump's skills.
In 1980, the city
had closed the skating rink for renovations. The work was only
supposed to take two years, but by 1986, it still wasn't finished.
That's when Trump showed up. He convinced Mayor Ed Koch to let him
take over the project, promising that the rink would be up and
running within three months. In return, he asked for the concession
rights. Exactly three months later, Trump unveiled the new ice
skating rink in a nationally televised ceremony. "Donald Trump
is a very talented man," says Gingrich.
But does he stand a
chance against Hillary Clinton? "Of course," says Gingrich.
"America is a big country. Anything can happen."
Tackling Clinton
This is evident on a
bitter cold January evening in Burlington, Vermont. A line has formed
in front of a local theater. Mary Loyer, 44, and her son Tim, 28, are
hoping to catch a glimpse of Trump. Tim works as a waiter, Mary is
unemployed. They're supporters of the left-wing democrat Bernie
Sanders, a long-time mayor of Burlington. But Mary says something
that one hears over and over again on the campaign trail: "If it
came down to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, I don't know who I'd
vote for. But it wouldn't be Clinton."
"Hillary is
corrupt," Tim says. "She does what Big Money wants her to
do, and she's constantly changing her position." Sanders and
Trump have more in common than it seems, he adds: "Both of them
are the only politicians who say what they think and do what they
say." His mom nods.
For a long time, the
Clinton camp fantasized about taking on Trump. The way they saw it,
it would be Clinton, an experienced, middle-of-the-road candidate,
versus Trump, the radical leader of the old, white guard. Many
democratic strategists viewed such a matchup as a unique opportunity.
Vice President Joe Biden said if Trump won the Republican nomination,
Hillary Clinton would "win in a walk."
In the meantime, it
has become apparent that Clinton can't even rely on the unconditional
support of her own people. For many, she represents a political
system that is symbiotically entwined with Big Business. Trump, the
big capitalist, however, bills himself as someone who is not for
sale. He doesn't accept big donations and doesn't owe anyone
anything. The fact that he, unlike Clinton, has never held a
political office is an advantage in this election campaign.
But many democrats
aren't panicking yet. They're betting on Clinton's campaign coming
around and gaining momentum once she secures the nomination. At the
same time, they are anxious that this could become the dirtiest duel
in the history of American presidential campaigns.
If it does, Roger
Stone will be the man to blame. The scrupulousness that has come to
define Trump's campaign is largely Stone's doing. He learned the
tricks of the trade from Richard Nixon in the 1970s, and later helped
Ronald Reagan get into the White House. By the end of the 1980s,
Stone was already trying to convince his friend Trump to run for
president. Almost everything Trump knows about politics and power, he
learned from Stone -- including the art of manipulation. Stone is
considered a master of defamatory rumors.
Stone also helped
Trump lay the foundations for his campaign last spring. Then in
summer, he was abruptly fired. Trump's people cited a disagreement
between the two, but observers now believe the split could have been
staged, a trick.
"I remain an
unabashed Trump supporter and Trump enthusiast," Stone said when
reached on the phone last autumn. "I just finally made a
decision that I could have a greater impact on the outside. Trump is
still a very close friend." As before, the two talk regularly
and Stone obviously gives Trump important advice. And just like old
times, Stone spends nearly every evening on TV touting Trump and his
"movement."
Since he is no
longer an official member of Trump's campaign team, Stone has the
freedom to be even more ruthless in his derision of Trump's
opponents, without the risk of the mud-slinging coming back to haunt
the candidate. Trump biographer D'Antonio describes Stone as "pure
evil." He is a "deeply disgusting person," someone who
doesn't understand anything but "brute force."
Stone's favorite
victim is Hillary Clinton. His recently published book, "The
Clintons' War on Women," is a nasty piece of work. But it could
also be seen as a blueprint for Trump's campaign against Hillary.
Without credible proof, Stone claims that Chelsea Clinton is not
Bill's biological daughter and that Bill has fathered at least one
son with a black prostitute. Stone calls the former president a
serial rapist and Hillary his henchwoman. He also suggests that
Hillary has the death of a man who knew about Bill's escapades on her
conscience.
In television
interviews, Stone claims Hillary is the "point person in the
terror campaign to intimidate and bully women into silence."
That she once waged a "nuts and sluts campaign to discredit
Monica Lewinsky to make it her fault that she was seduced by a man
three times her age." He has also stated that "Bill rapes
women physically and Hillary rapes them psychologically." He
claims Hillary Clinton "has no right to call herself an advocate
for women and girls." Trump recently released a campaign video
with a similar message.
"The Clintons
are money-making opportunists and criminals," Stone says. Their
foundation is nothing more than a "luxury travel service to
augment the lifestyles of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton."
People with those kinds of friends and advisers don't leave much to
the imagination as to their character, he says.
A Threat to World
Peace
If the most powerful
office in the world wasn't at stake, all this wouldn't be nearly as
dangerous. Germany has been too busy dealing with the supposed threat
posed by refugees in recent months to appreciate what's really been
going on across the Atlantic. Despite their differences, the US and
Germany share an unshakeable faith in democracy and freedom. But
nothing would be more harmful to the idea of the West and world peace
than if Donald Trump were to be elected president. Compared to that,
the America of George W. Bush would seem like a land of logic and
reason in retrospect.
Bush, to his credit,
never compared migrants to poisonous snakes -- something Trump did
recently at a rally in Pensacola, Florida. Later that night, Trump
addressed what has been one of his favorite topics lately: Europe's
refugee crisis. "Just talk to the folks over in Germany,"
he said. "Europe is being destroyed."
When he puts on his
reading glasses, the audience goes quiet. "Just listen to this,"
he says, pulling a piece of paper from his pocket. He printed out the
lyrics to "The Snake," an old soul hit from Al Wilson. The
song is about a snake, half frozen from the cold, that asks a woman
to be let inside. The woman takes pity on the animal and holds it to
her bosom, upon which the snake bites and poisons her.
Trump reads the
lyrics aloud passionately, as if he were auditioning for a role. "Oh,
shut up silly woman," he says, imitating the snake: "You
knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in." The crowd
cheers. They're over the moon. Trump just stares back at them. "We're
gonna get bit."
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário