Profile
Mr Justice Goss: Lucy Letby judge is used to
making big decisions
He looked relaxed before the jury gave its verdict in
the latest high-profile case he has presided over
Haroon
Siddique and Josh Halliday
Mon 21 Aug
2023 06.00 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/21/mr-justice-goss-lucy-letby-judge-big-decisions
The judge
who will decide on Monday whether Lucy Letby will ever be released from prison
is well-versed in making big decisions.
In 2017, Mr
Justice Goss took the almost unprecedented step of deciding on the guilt of
three defendants himself, having dismissed the jurors after they were
approached and offered bribes as they left the court building. It was believed
to be just the second time a judge had done so.
If, as
expected, Goss hands Letby a whole-life sentence, she will become only the
third woman alive to be handed such a term. Letby is refusing to attend her
sentencing, something Goss, who has no power to compel her to be present, has
said he will comment on during her sentencing.
Born James
Richard William Goss in 1953, educated at Charterhouse school and then
University College, Durham, he was called to the bar in 1975, specialising in
criminal law. He became a senior barrister (at the time a QC) in 1997. He began
as a recorder (part-time judge) in 1994 and became a full-time circuit judge on
the north-east circuit in 2009.
He had
presided over several high-profile trials before the Letby case. In 2006, he
was the judge in the trial of the killer of seven-year-old Toni-Ann Byfield,
who was shot in the back at close range having witnessed the murder of a man
she believed to be her father. Goss recommended that Joel Smith serve a minimum
of 40 years in jail for the killings.
More
recently, Goss presided over the trial of Carl Beech, who was jailed for 18
years for fabricating allegations about a murderous VIP paedophile ring in
Westminster, which resulted in a multimillion-pound Scotland Yard inquiry.
Beech claimed the gang of abusers included the former prime minister Edward
Heath, the D-day veteran Lord Bramall, the former home secretary Leon Brittan,
and the ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor.
Sailesh
Mehta, a barrister at Red Lion Chambers who has appeared before Goss, said of
him: “As you would expect he has an exceedingly sharp intellect, he also has an
acerbic wit.”
The Letby
case was challenging for all involved. As is perhaps to be expected in such a
long case, there were numerous issues with jurors including illness, family
emergencies and urgent medical appointments, which meant the trial ran three
months over schedule.
But Goss
never expressed irritation in front of the eight women and four men on the
jury, even when their deliberations ran into a fifth week, telling them there
was “no pressure of time”.
The judge’s
only show of displeasure came on day four of the trial when jurors were not in
court. He complained that the US website Daily Beast had run a typically
inflammatory report – labelling Letby “the Angel of Death” – in breach of the
many strict reporting restrictions that the UK press had adhered to.
He
complained there was little he could do because it was a US-based website but
seethed to the assembled barristers that it was a breach that was “blatant,
absolutely blatant … It’s outrageous actually”. As one barrister anonymously
told the Guardian, Goss “doesn’t suffer fools gladly”.
But on
Friday, as jury deliberations entered their 120th hour, he looked relaxed as he
was seen strolling around the courtroom without his traditional wig and gown,
chatting to staff and at one point sitting in the seats reserved for Letby’s
legal team. Minutes later, shortly after midday, he received a note from the
jury that brought an end to one of the longest and most harrowing murder trials
in recent memory.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário