Sinema Adds Intrigue and Democratic Fury to
Arizona’s 2024 Senate Race
Senator Kyrsten Sinema’s announcement that she would
become an independent left Democrats in her state, many of whom have long
wanted to defeat her in a primary, facing a new political calculus.
Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona said in a video on
Friday that “nothing is going to change for me,” despite her party switch from
Democrat to independent.
Reid J. EpsteinJennifer MedinaKatie Glueck
By Reid J. Epstein, Jennifer Medina and Katie Glueck
Dec. 9,
2022
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/09/us/politics/kyrsten-sinema-arizona-senate-democrats.html
The one
constant in Senator Kyrsten Sinema’s political career, from her start as a
left-wing rabble rouser and Ralph Nader aide to her announcement on Friday that
she was leaving the Democratic Party to become an independent, is her boundless
ability to draw attention to herself.
Less than
72 hours after Democrats celebrated winning Georgia’s Senate race and the
presumed 51st vote in the chamber, Ms. Sinema yanked the focus of the political
world in Washington and Arizona back to her.
This time,
it was not another agenda-stymieing disagreement with the party that spent
millions electing her to office, but instead a declaration that she was
breaking with Democrats entirely, at least in name.
“I’m going
to be the same person I’ve always been. That’s who I am,” Ms. Sinema said in a
two-minute video on Twitter on Friday morning, adding, “Nothing is going to
change for me.”
Democrats
believe — or hope — that little will change in Congress, where Ms. Sinema will
keep her Democratic committee assignments and where her defection will not
change her former party’s control of the Senate.
But in
Arizona’s Democratic circles, distaste for the senator runs deep, and her
announcement immediately shifted the spotlight to the 2024 race for her Senate
seat.
Democrats
in the state have long presumed that she would run for re-election and that she
was all but certain to face a difficult primary challenge, possibly from
Representative Ruben Gallego, who has regularly criticized her over the past
two years, or from Representative Greg Stanton, who signaled his interest on
Friday. Ms. Sinema, however, left her potential rivals guessing, batting away
questions about future bids for office.
Hannah
Hurley, a spokeswoman for Ms. Sinema, suggested that the senator had long
promised to be an independent voice for the state, citing an ad from her 2018
campaign that emphasized a “fiercely independent record” and a “reputation for
working across the aisle.”
“Independent,
just like Arizona,” the spot said.
“She is not
focused at all on campaign politics,” Ms. Hurley said of Ms. Sinema, who
declined an interview on Friday afternoon.
Democrats
in Arizona signaled on Friday that they still planned to support a candidate
against Ms. Sinema, whether it ends up being Mr. Gallego, Mr. Stanton or
someone else. National Democratic leaders were cagey on Friday about how they
would approach the 2024 race or a potential independent Sinema campaign. One
main worry for Democrats is that running a strong candidate against Ms. Sinema
in the general election might inadvertently help elect a Republican.
Representatives
for Senate Democrats’ campaign arm and for Senate Majority PAC, the leading
Democratic super PAC devoted to Senate races, declined to comment on Friday
afternoon about Ms. Sinema’s move. Senator Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat
and majority leader, said that Ms. Sinema would keep her committee positions.
“Kyrsten is independent,” he said in a statement. “That’s how she’s always
been.”
And the
White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, said in a statement that
President Biden expected to “continue to work successfully” with Ms. Sinema but
did not address her 2024 prospects.
Ms. Sinema
was elected to the Senate in 2018, filling the seat of another party apostate,
Senator Jeff Flake, a Republican who declined to seek re-election after
breaking with President Donald J. Trump. He is now Mr. Biden’s ambassador to
Turkey.
The working
assumption in Arizona political circles has long been that progressive anger at
Ms. Sinema was concentrated among Democratic political activists, and that she
could survive a primary from her left. But recent polling suggests that she has
lost the confidence of many Arizona voters outside the center-right Chamber of
Commerce types whom she has cultivated with the latest iteration of her
political identity.
A Civiqs
survey conducted shortly before Election Day found she had an approval rating
of just 7 percent among the state’s Democrats, 27 percent among Republicans and
29 percent among independents.
Moderate
Republicans uncomfortable with Mr. Trump’s politics have turned Arizona from a
red state into a political battleground, swinging to Mr. Biden in 2020 and
helping Democrats triumph in statewide elections last month against a
Trump-backed slate of candidates. Ms. Sinema’s calculation in leaving the
Democratic Party is that those voters can lift her to victory on their own.
The
Trumpian makeover of the Arizona Republican Party has also alarmed Democrats
who want their candidates to be a forceful opposition — not present themselves
as ideologically ambiguous.
“Everything
she’s done has been in the service of Kyrsten Sinema,” said Ian Danley, a
progressive political consultant in Phoenix. “There’s really no other way to
describe the decisions she makes. She cares about attention. She cares about
setting herself up for the next thing.”
The
Democratic grumbling has Mr. Gallego and Mr. Stanton leaving little pretense
about their ambitions to challenge Ms. Sinema in 2024. Mr. Gallego, a Harvard
graduate and Marine veteran, has been a regular presence on cable news whenever
Ms. Sinema alienates the party base, and his lively and occasionally profane
Twitter feed often criticizes her. On Friday, he called her decision a
“betrayal” of volunteers who knocked on doors in triple-digit heat to elect her
as a Democrat.
Mr.
Stanton, a former Phoenix mayor who holds Ms. Sinema’s old House seat, on
Friday tweeted what appeared to be a snapshot of a poll showing him leading Ms.
Sinema by 40 percentage points in a hypothetical matchup.
Her
decision, he wrote, “isn’t about a post-partisan epiphany. It’s about political
preservation.”
Arizona’s
progressive organizations and officials were already wary of Ms. Sinema during
her 2018 run for Senate, but at the time no Democrat in the state had won
election to the chamber in three decades. They collectively held their noses to
turn out the vote for her in hopes that she would reciprocate their support
once in office.
Once Ms.
Sinema became the linchpin of Senate Democrats’ narrow governing majority in
2021, those groups began publicly fuming at Ms. Sinema, whom they accused of
abandoning her promises on immigration, health care and the environment. Ms.
Sinema dismissed their complaints, echoing her general practice of dodging
journalists in Washington and Arizona.
When she
theatrically turned a thumbs-down on a Senate vote in March 2021 to increase
the minimum wage to $15 per hour, it was the last straw for her party’s base.
When she skipped votes to participate in Ironman triathlons or spent weeks as
an intern at a Sonoma County winery, it served only to cement her reputation
among progressives that she had removed herself from the concerns of
working-class Arizonans.
In the fall
of 2021, activists from LUCHA, one of the groups that worked to elect Ms.
Sinema, confronted her at Arizona State University. Activists followed Ms.
Sinema into a bathroom and demanded that she explain why she had not done more
to push for a pathway to citizenship for about eight million undocumented
immigrants. The protesters said they had taken the drastic action only because
Ms. Sinema did not hold town-hall meetings or answer calls from constituents.
Protesters have also chased her through airports and followed her into a high-priced
fund-raising event at an upscale resort.
“We are not
surprised that she would once again center herself,” said Alejandra Gomez, the
executive director of LUCHA. “This is another unfortunate, selfish act. It is
yet another betrayal — there have been a slew of betrayals, but this is one of
the ultimates, because voters elected her as Democrat, and she turned her back
on those voters.”
But some of
Ms. Sinema’s allies argue that she has been consistently clear about having an
independent streak.
“I love
that she’s going to be even freer now to just do the right thing,” said Tammy
Caputi, a Scottsdale City Council member who is herself a political
independent, adding that Ms. Sinema had long been leery of being
“straitjacketed by partisan politics.”
She went
on, “I’m hoping that Kyrsten’s decision to become an independent will spark
other people to think long and hard about being overly attached to one party.”
But for
many Arizonans and Ms. Sinema’s fellow senators, the big question is whether or
not she will run again in 2024, which she neglected to clarify in her video
announcement, an op-ed article in The Arizona Republic or news media interviews
that were released on Friday morning. Because she keeps a tight political
circle of advisers and speaks little to the news media, there has long been far
more speculation than explanation about her motivations.
“Anybody
that underestimates Senator Sinema is being foolish,” said Representative Raúl
Grijalva, a liberal Arizona Democrat who said he planned to support Mr. Gallego
if he ran. “She’s going to be formidable if she decides to run.”
A person
familiar with Mr. Stanton’s deliberations confirmed that he was considering
running for Senate in Arizona in 2024 as a Democrat. The person confirmed that
the image from a poll that Mr. Stanton tweeted on Friday was from a statewide survey
in which he had tested his potential candidacy for Senate.
In an
interview on Friday, Mr. Gallego said Ms. Sinema’s rush to announce her party
switch soon after the outcome of the Georgia race fit neatly into her career
trajectory.
“I wish she
would have waited for the Democrats at least to enjoy a couple more days after
the victory,” he said. “But, you know, she’s not known really for thinking of
others.”
Mr. Gallego
said he would make a decision about what office to seek in 2024 in the new
year. He had just gotten off the phone with his mother, who was catching up on
the news.
“She said:
‘I heard Sinema is not running. Make sure to talk to me before you do
anything,’” Mr. Gallego said.
A
correction was made on Dec. 9, 2022: An earlier version of this article
referred incorrectly to Kyrsten Sinema’s election in 2018. At the time, no
Democrat had won election to the Senate in Arizona in 30 years; it was not the
case that no Arizona Democrat had won statewide election in that time period.
When we learn
of a mistake, we acknowledge it with a correction. If you spot an error, please
let us know at nytnews@nytimes.com.Learn more
Reid J.
Epstein covers campaigns and elections from Washington. Before joining The
Times in 2019, he worked at The Wall Street Journal, Politico, Newsday and The
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
Jennifer
Medina is a national politics reporter, covering political attitudes and power,
with a focus on the West. A Southern California native, she spent several years
reporting on the region for the National desk. @jennymedina
Katie
Glueck is a national political reporter. Previously, she was chief Metro
political correspondent, and a lead reporter for The Times covering the Biden
campaign. She also covered politics for McClatchy’s Washington bureau and for
Politico. @katieglueck



Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário