Rail strikes set to turn joy at extra UK train
services to woe
Four days of action are planned just as a new rail
timetable, with hundreds more trains, is set to come into effect
Things could stay very unclear for Avanti West Coast
passengers until the dispute over pay and working practices is resolved.
Gwyn Topham
Gwyn Topham
Transport correspondent
@GwynTopham
Sun 11 Dec
2022 07.00 GMT
Rail
passengers have been asked to check schedules carefully this week, as new
timetables, with extra services, are to be introduced on Sunday and Monday –
almost coinciding with four days of strikes that from Tuesday will stop 80% of
trains across Britain.
Only the
most optimistic gambler, or a train operator forced to promise rapid
improvements, would have staked much on things suddenly coming right for the
railways on a freezing winter weekend. Yet the advent of a new timetable,
officially from Sundaybut with the big changes on weekdays, should in theory
bring more frequent and reliable trains back, especially in the north.
In
practice, with strikes on Network Rail and 14 train operators about to derail
services again, the success of the new timetables is unlikely to be apparent
until well into 2023. But it is some measure of how far services have declined
that the first two days of the timetable change are passengers’ best chance of
a smooth journey in the next month. In May 2018 a new timetable sparked
chaotic, disruptive – and self-inflicted – mayhem.
Avanti West
Coast, whose pitiful summer performance was underlined by figures from the rail
regulator last week, had circled these dates for a grand restoration of its
schedule: three trains an hour between Manchester and London for the first time
since Covid, two hourly from Birmingham, and direct trains to and from north
Wales.
Overtime had been baked in to Avanti’s operation, but
the sudden disappearance of goodwill was a reminder that it was a voluntary
setup
Overall,
the number of Avanti trains scheduled is up almost 40%, from 194 a day on
weekdays to 265 – but this is a company that has been put on notice to sort
things out during a six-month contract extension. Things got so bad from July
to September, according to data from the Office of Rail and Road, that fewer
than four in 10 trains ran on time, and one in eight was cancelled – even after
it removed thousands of services from the schedules.
Most
importantly, the revised timetable should function without requiring rest-day
working by drivers and crew. Overtime had been baked in to Avanti’s operation,
but the sudden disappearance of goodwill was a reminder that it was a voluntary
setup.
Few expect
the new timetable to be delivered in full on Monday, not least because of
widespread staff sickness at this time of year. But there should still be more
trains, and Avanti says it will be a foundation for a stronger recovery in
January.
Another
First Group operator, TransPennine Express (TPE), is also bringing in
significant changes that it hopes will make its schedule more resilient, after
a period in which TPE replaced Avanti as the byword for northern travellers’
despair.
TPE plans
to reintroduce trains between Manchester and Scotland via the west coast
mainline, and extend its Cleethorpes-Manchester service to Liverpool. More
importantly, Network Rail planners believe tweaks to the timings for TPE and
Northern either side of Manchester will spell more reliable services.
Sceptical
northern politicians will believe it when they see it. TPE has, like Avanti,
been hit by reluctance to work on rest days, and driver numbers are still
fragile after a training backlog built up during Covid.
The
industry says the new timetable remains “an opportunity to provide more
certainty for passengers, with a focus on improving punctuality and
reliability”. But a spokesperson for the Rail Delivery Group added: “It is
deeply unfortunate that implementation of the new timetable is coinciding with
the start of widespread industrial action that will undermine those ambitions.”
That wider
rail dispute continues to rage. There is a glimmer of possibility on Monday,
when the RMT announces the result of its electronic referendum on Network
Rail’s new offer. The executive has recommended it be rejected – but
referendums have been known to defy the wishes of those who called them.
General
secretary Mick Lynch said leadership would be bound by the result, and if the
offer was accepted, “that’s the end of the dispute”. The two-year offer is well
below inflation, but with a bigger uplift to the lowest paid. Lynch said
three-quarters of RMT members at Network Rail earned less than £35,000. RMT
members earning about £20,000 a year could see a cumulative rise of up to 15%.
Action
short of a strike – an overtime ban – was lifted for Network Rail staff but
still holds, from 18 December to 2 January, for those employed by train
operators. On some routes, such as Chiltern Railways’ lines into Birmingham,
this will effectively be as disruptive as a strike.
With the
rail dispute emblematic of the wider public sector battle for fair pay, and
Lynch accusing the government of sabotaging talks by inserting demands for
bitterly resisted driver-only operation, a swift resolution looks unlikely.
Passengers meanwhile face up to four weeks of disruption – including,
ironically, some in Scotland and Wales, where disputes with transport
authorities outside Network Rail have been settled.
The RMT
strikes will cut train services by 80% on 13, 14, 16 and 17 December, and 3, 4,
6 and 7 January, with some disruption on the following mornings. More strikes
from late 24 December to early 27 December will limit some Christmas Eve trains
but mainly affect a £100m programme of engineering works – “a monumental act of
harm”, according to Network Rail boss Andrew Haines. And for all the dates in
between, the overtime ban will reduce services by 20% overall, with more
short-term cancellations likely.
.webp)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário