sexta-feira, 31 de julho de 2020

Why Trump might quit / VIDEO: Joe On Trump: ‘A Sad, Pathetic Display’ | Morning Joe | MSNBC



Former RNC Chairman Michael Steele joins Morning Joe to discuss the legitimacy of mail-in ballots, as GOP leaders reject Pres. Trump’s suggestion to delay the ‘rigged’ election in November.



ALTITUDE
Why Trump might quit

There is logic behind saying to hell with reelection.

By JOHN F. HARRIS 7/30/20, 12:08 PM CET

Altitude is a column by POLITICO founding editor John Harris, offering weekly perspective on politics in a moment of radical disruption.

The purpose of the nationally televised Oval Office address was to announce new peace initiatives in Vietnam, but Lyndon B. Johnson saved the most startling news until the end of his speech on March 31, 1968. With his country badly divided over a grinding war, he didn’t believe as president he “should devote an hour or a day of my time to any personal partisan causes.” He was dropping out of the presidential campaign.

Now there was a president who knew how to shake up the plot.

Among Donald Trump’s problems in his long, hot and mostly housebound summer is that he has lost his once unparalleled gift for changing the story. He still can stir outrage, but even among his supporters he no longer has much capacity to surprise. “Every hero,” wrote Ralph Waldo Emerson a century before the president was born, “becomes a bore at last.”

But here is a way Trump could demonstrate that an old master still knows how to tear up the script and leave the audience gasping. It is late but not too late to pull an LBJ.

For decades, Trump has fashioned a leadership persona around the mystique of success and strength and indomitability.

As it happens, the "Trump drops out" scenario is one I have trafficked to colleagues and sources for a couple years now, usually to dismissive grunts or quizzical stares. It is true that there is scant time left for the scenario to come to pass. It’s true also that, if I were a reliable predictor of Trump’s political fortunes, Hillary Clinton would now be running for reelection.

But even if one doesn’t really think Trump will drop out of the race — as a proselytizer of the theory I acknowledge it is a stretch — it is worth examining the reasons he just might, as a way of illuminating the bleakness of his situation with just over three months to go before the general election.

No doubt Trump would savor the validation of winning a second term. Under the current trajectory, that looks less likely than not; by the light of some evidence it looks highly unlikely. One question is whether Trump genuinely believes he has a plausible plan — beyond throw a lot of stuff against the wall and hope some of it sticks — to change that trajectory. The second question is how Trump conceives of the balance of his lifetime — and his historical reputation after that — if he were to lose to Joseph Biden and join the ranks of defeated incumbents.

The "Trump drops out" scenario hinges on the assumption that Trump is less concerned with wielding the levers of government than he is preserving his role as disrupter at large in American politics over the next decade. The latter might be much easier to maintain if he avoids being tattooed as loser in November — especially if the margin is larger than could be attributed, even by his most conspiracy-minded supporters, to media bias or vote-counting manipulation by Democrats.

The scenario hinges also on an assumption that Trump’s political project is more weakened internally — in the psychological sense — than it is even in the external sense, as measured by polls and campaign coverage.

Trump in recent days has scotched a planned rally and canceled plans for a massive partisan extravaganza at the Republican National Convention. He has gone from saying the coronavirus pandemic would be quickly routed in the spring to acknowledging, five months into the crisis, that the situation will probably “get worse before it gets better.” After saying masks weren’t for him, and implying that they are for weak spirits, he finally began wearing one and urging others to do so.

Most of the coverage has been on the theme that Trump is now right and is tacitly admitting he was wrong before — wrong not to take these and other steps much earlier to unite the country around the importance of deferring to health experts and rigorous social distancing.


But Trump surely must wonder — on the question that matters most to him — whether he was right before and is stuck in the wrong place now. For decades, Trump has fashioned a leadership persona around the mystique of success and strength and indomitability. He has long acted as if he believes that mystique is highly perishable. That’s why he never apologizes or says he was wrong. Once one is exposed as having erred, or even having normal human doubt about the path ahead, perceptions change irreversibly from strength to weakness.

People who recoil at Trump’s boasting, bullying and bombast generally know much more than he does about how conventional presidents act. But Trump surely knows much more than the critics do about how to manage the Trump persona. The pictures of Trump a few weeks ago after the weakly attended Tulsa rally — his tie undone, his face twisted in a dispirited scowl — suggest he knows that once his aura of success is punctured it will be difficult to recover. When was the last time Trump seemed to be really enjoying himself in the presidency?

Trump knows also that perceptions of power and success have an intimidating effect. As he looks to the fall, it is not opponents that he needs to keep in line. It is allies. Trump’s presidency has been propelled by two great engines of enablement. One of these, Fox News, has been robustly enthusiastic. He’s been great for business, and Fox News’ most loyal viewers are loyal to Trump. The other enabler, personified by Mitch McConnell, is not enthusiastic but sullenly transactional. McConnell and the business wing of the GOP don’t much like Trump, but they do like the chance to push their agenda on judges and deregulation.

What are the incentives of these enablers if, in late September or early October, Trump looks as beleaguered as he does in late July? In either case, an outright break with Trump is unlikely. Fox is concerned most about preserving its huge profitability. The network’s leaders would presumably be wary of potentially sustaining permanent brand damage with corporate advertisers by joining Trump in a last-ditch campaign of racially charged cultural warfare. That’s especially so if they perceive Trump is going to lose anyway. In the case of McConnell, he knows that Trump’s unpopularity is the primary factor that continued GOP control of the Senate is at best a tossup. He and other Republicans already are trying to localize their races, not splitting with Trump but finding distance from him.

These incentives mean Trump could be a very lonely figure this fall.

Yes, but: Hasn’t Trump been lonely before, as after the Access Hollywood video in October 2016? True enough, although in circumstances in which the gravity of the nation’s challenges and the voter’s choice seem much less severe than now. And wouldn’t dropping out of the race brand him as something worse than loser, a quitter?

That one Trump could plausibly answer with an unusual approach: say something approximating the truth. This doesn’t sound much like how Trump talks but, in some moods, it may be close to what he thinks: Fellow Americans, I know I am a disrupter, and everyone knows I thrive on conflict. I believe that disruption is what Republicans and the country needed when I ran for president in 2016, and that is what I delivered. But I realize the pandemic creates a whole new agenda. I am going to devote the balance of my term to trying to get this country opened up safely, and allow someone without my sharp edges make the case for Republicans this fall.

Just this week Trump pondered why Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx have higher approval ratings than he does, even though he is their boss. “It can only be my personality, that’s all,” he told reporters.

Winning a second term was always going to be a challenge for a president who has never had a majority job approval.

Long term, forgoing the race with a measure of self-awareness conceivably could elevate Trump’s historical reputation higher than it would be if he loses reelection after a remorseless and demagogic campaign. In the near term, if a replacement nominee (presumably Vice President Mike Pence) would be indebted to Trump and subject to his leverage if he managed to beat Biden. If he lost, Trump could complain that his protégé blew it, and play GOP kingmaker (perhaps on behalf of one of his children or other allies) in 2024 without the stigma of having been expressly rejected by voters.

How plausible is this? Not terribly.

But how plausible is Trump reversing the astonishing decay in his political foundation in recent months? Winning a second term was always going to be a challenge for a president who has never had a majority job approval. At the start of the year, however, his advisers described a plausible path to reelection. The strategy had three main elements. One assumption was that, even if he was running slightly behind in swing states, his financial and organizational advantages, combined with the passion of supporters, would mean he would outperform polls by 2 to 3 percentage points. The second assumption was that Trump had room to grow his vote share with minority voters, especially African American men; even modest improvement by Trump could weaken the Democratic coalition in devastating ways. The third assumption was that Trump could repackage his divisive style as an asset. “He’s no Mr. Nice Guy,” the narrator intoned in a Trump TV ad that aired in the 2019 World Series, “but sometimes it takes a Donald Trump to change Washington.”

Five months into the pandemic, not one of those three assumptions looks secure. In key swing states he is currently running much more than a couple points behind. After the George Floyd murder and Trump’s response, the notion of gains with African American voters is highly unlikely. His plan to portray himself as an ass-kicking chief executive who presided over a booming economy is in tatters, amid vast joblessness and the prospect that the pandemic will shadow virtually every corner of American life well into 2021.

In circumstances as grim as these, it would be surprising but not inconceivable if Trump decided it is time for a séance with LBJ.

Economy suffers record-breaking GDP fall due to COVID-19



Quatro em cada 10 deputados foram eleitos pelo menos três vezes



ESTUDO
Quatro em cada 10 deputados foram eleitos pelo menos três vezes
09:23 por Lusa

Estudo concluiu que dos cerca de 3.600 lugares ocupados ao longo de 44 anos, quase 1.500 permaneceram no lugar durante 12 anos.

"De entre os parlamentares que mais contribuíram para o processo de estagnação, há mesmo um deputado que foi eleito 14 vezes, dois deles 13 vezes e quatro deles 12 vezes. Se a análise tiver por base os deputados que foram eleitos para quatro mandatos, chegamos aos 300 no período de tempo estudado", sustenta.

Quatro em cada 10 deputados à Assembleia da República (AR) foram eleitos, pelo menos, para três mandatos entre 1976 e 2019, concluiu uma tese de pós-doutoramento realizada na Universidade da Beira Interior (UBI).

Jorge Fraqueiro, autor do estudo de pós-doutoramento "O Sistema Político Português - Renovação ou Estagnação do Deputados à Assembleia da República (1976-2019)", concluiu ainda que, "dos cerca de 3.600 lugares ocupados ao longo dos 44 anos, quase 1.500 permaneceram no lugar durante 12 anos".

"Apesar da considerável inclusão de novos nomes nas últimas duas eleições legislativas (2015 e 2019), os níveis de estagnação em Portugal, no Parlamento, continuam, em termos médios gerais, bastante elevados", sublinha o investigador e cientista político.

Jorge Fraqueiro, ex-jornalista, tinha já revelado dados sobre a estagnação dos atores políticos em Portugal, na sua tese de doutoramento defendida em 2014, tendo agora procedido à sua atualização no pós-doutoramento.

"De entre os parlamentares que mais contribuíram para o processo de estagnação, há mesmo um deputado que foi eleito 14 vezes, dois deles 13 vezes e quatro deles 12 vezes. Se a análise tiver por base os deputados que foram eleitos para quatro mandatos, chegamos aos 300 no período de tempo estudado", sustenta.

O investigador realça ainda que, dos atuais 230 deputados na AR, apesar de cerca de metade estar a cumprir o seu primeiro mandato, mais de um quarto deles vão já na sua terceira legislatura.

Além disso, o estudo revela também que 55 têm menos de 40 anos e, destes, 10 estão já no seu segundo mandato.

"Nos 14 atos eleitorais para a AR que tiveram lugar desde 1976, as eleições de 1979 foram aquelas onde houve maior nível de repetição de nomes, com 69% dos deputados a transitarem do mandato imediatamente anterior", refere a tese.

Contudo, o investigador adianta que, mais recentemente, o ano no qual a estagnação atingiu valores percentuais mais elevados foi em 2009, com 63%.

"Já o ano de 1991 foi aquele em que os partidos políticos mais mudaram os nomes dos candidatos apresentados a sufrágio", frisou.

Jorge Fraqueiro deixa um conjunto de propostas para a melhoria do sistema político, designadamente no que diz respeito à necessária renovação, nomeadamente dos deputados.

Propõe, desde logo, a redução dos parlamentares dos atuais 230 para o mínimo de 180 permitidos constitucionalmente.

Além disso, recomenda que se imponha também na AR a limitação de mandatos para no máximo três.

Consciente de que nenhum sistema eleitoral consegue, simultaneamente, defender a governabilidade e a representação, o investigador apresenta também uma proposta para que se passe a ter um sistema misto, com 180 deputados.

Na tese, pode também ler-se que, em termos partidários, o Partido Comunista Português (PCP) foi, até ao momento, aquele que mais tempo manteve os seus deputados no Parlamento, com uma percentagem de estagnação média de 45%.

Segue-se na lista o Partido Ecologista "Os Verdes" (PEV) com uma percentagem de 42%.

Entre aqueles que mais renovam as suas listas de candidatos surge, no topo, o Bloco de Esquerda (BE), com 17% de estagnação, que veio a destronar o CDS/PP, que no estudo apresentado pelo investigador no seu doutoramento, colocava, até 2012, este último partido como o menos estagnador.

O PSD e o PS registam, atualmente, uma média de estagnação de 31% e 36%, respetivamente.

O estudo aborda também a questão da magnitude dos círculos eleitorais, colocando reservas quanto aos mandatos atribuídos a cada um deles.

Jorge Fraqueiro chama a atenção para o facto de apenas seis distritos (Lisboa, Porto, Braga, Setúbal, Aveiro, Leiria) ocuparem quase 66% dos lugares no Parlamento, ou seja, 151 deputados.

Por outro lado, os seis círculos mais interiores de Portugal Continental (Bragança, Guarda, Castelo Branco, Portalegre, Évora, Beja) têm apenas direito a 7,8% dos lugares, ou seja, 18 deputados.

Para o investigador, a prática política tem sido a principal responsável pelo afastamento dos eleitores das urnas, à qual associa ainda o "cada vez maior fechamento dos partidos políticos à sociedade civil".

Trata-se de um tema que os atores políticos, apesar andarem a fazer "vista grossa", "deve merecer a maior atenção e cuidado podendo, ainda que, apenas no plano teórico, constituir uma ameaça aos valores democráticos".

USA vs China: A new Cold War? | To the point




Consulate closures. Trade war. Military manoeuvres. Tensions continue to rise between the superpowers USA and China. Is it the beginning of a new Cold War? Our guests: Qian Sun (freelance journalist), Daniel Hamilton (Johns Hopkins University) and Mareike Ohlberg (sinologist)

Group prepares for chance Trump refuses to concede election




CNN's Erin Burnett talks with Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (Ret.), who is part of a bipartisan group that has been meeting to game out scenarios if President Trump loses the election in November and refuses to concede. Trump has suggested delaying the November election because the pandemic complicates the voting process.

quinta-feira, 30 de julho de 2020

Republicans Won't Back Up Trump On Delaying 2020 Election | The 11th Hou...




With COVID-19 still surging and new economic data showing the economy has cratered, Trump floated the idea of delaying the 2020 election while also attacking voting by mail. Republicans were quick to dismiss delaying the November vote. Aired on 7/30/2020.

Ghislaine Maxwell: court unseals documents related to dealings with Epstein



Ghislaine Maxwell: court unseals documents related to dealings with Epstein

Cache of papers unsealed on Thursday night
Maxwell has been charged with involvement in Epstein crimes

Victoria Bekiempis
Fri 31 Jul 2020 03.39 BSTFirst published on Fri 31 Jul 2020 02.39 BST

A cache of documents in civil litigation against the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell was unsealed on Thursday night, including early 2015 correspondence with her longtime confidant Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender.

The documents stem from a 2015 civil action brought against Maxwell by Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, who has claimed that Maxwell lured her into Epstein’s orbit at 15 years old, under the guise of offering work as a masseuse. They include personal emails between Epstein and Maxwell as well as information from a discussion between Giuffre and her lawyer.

Many documents in this case have been subject to an intense legal battle. Maxwell’s attorneys in the civil suit had argued to keep many records under seal, maintaining previously that “this series of pleadings concerns [attempts] to compel Ms Maxwell to answer intrusive questions about her sex life”. The documents, they argued, are “extremely personal, confidential and subject to considerable abuse by the media”.

Manhattan federal court judge Loretta Preska ruled on 23 July to unseal them, however, saying: “The court finds that the countervailing interests identified fail to rebut the presumption of public access.”

Documents involving Maxwell’s deposition have not been released yet, as her lawyers are appealing their unsealing.

Federal authorities arrested Maxwell on 2 July and charged her for allegedly participating in Epstein’s sex trafficking. Maxwell, daughter of the late publishing baron Robert Maxwell, pleaded not guilty on 14 July. Maxwell has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Her lawyers have said she “vigorously denies the charges” and is “entitled to the presumption of innocence”.

The documents released on Thursday help shed light on Maxwell and Epstein’s personal relations. In one of the personal emails between Epstein and Maxwell, Epstein wrote on 25 January 2015: “You have done nothing wrong and i woudl [sic] urge you to start acting like it. “Go outside, head high, not as an esacping[sic] convict. go to parties. deal with it.”

The exchange followed a request from Maxwell, who was romantically linked to Epstein, to be distanced from his dating life.

Some of them also relate to previous claims of Giuffre, such as former US President Bill Clinton riding on Epstein’s plane, and allegations about lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz, who had worked as Epstein’s attorney, has repeatedly denied misconduct. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

During brief questioning about Bill Clinton, the documents show Giuffre said she saw the former president on Epstein’s island. Representatives for Clinton did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Clinton has distanced himself from Epstein, and in a 2019 statement a spokesperson said “President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York.”

The documents also show that Giuffre was asked in an interview whether Epstein ever bragged about the age of any girls with whom he had sexual relations. “Yes, he did. He did all the time,” she said. “The worst one that I heard from his own mouth was this pretty 12 year old girls he had flown in for his birthday. It was a surprise birthday gift from one of his friends and they were from France,” she alleged.

Epstein told her powerful people owed him favors, Giuffre claimed, according to the documents. “Lots of people owed him favors from what he told me… That’s why I believe he does so many favors in the first place.”

Giuffre was also asked whether Britain’s Prince Andrew – whom she has claimed she had sex with as a teenager at Epstein’s behest - would have information about the financier.

“He would know a lot of the truth,” she said.

Prince Andrew has vehemently denied allegations of misconduct.

Maxwell met Giuffre at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in south Florida, where the then teen was working as a locker-room attendant.

In the civil lawsuit, which has since been settled, Giuffre claimed that Maxwell had defamed her, by stating that she was a liar for accusing Epstein and Maxwell of sexual impropriety.

An extensive collection of documents in this suit was also unsealed last August. They featured both bombshell claims, and denials that world leaders participated in Epstein’s alleged sex ring. These filings were disclosed shortly after Epstein’s arrest last July. Epstein killed himself in jail last August.

Maxwell is being held in jail pending trial, which is scheduled for next July.