Mamdani
Stands By His Handling of Oct. 7 Anniversary After Emotional Day
The mayor
expressed no regrets after he was criticized by Jewish leaders over a statement
marking the anniversary of the Oct. 7 attacks and later booed by
pro-Palestinian activists at a vigil.
Video

Mamdani
Responds to Backlash After Attending Oct. 7 Vigil
1:13
Mayor
Zohran Mamdani of New York City responded to the backlash he received after
attending a vigil that marked the third anniversary of the Oct. 7 attacks. The
mayor also addressed criticism of his social media post about the attacks that
focused more on the people of Gaza.CreditCredit...Hilary Swift for The New York
Times
By Dana RubinsteinLiam Stack and Sally Goldenberg
Oct. 8,
2026
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/08/nyregion/mamdani-oct-7-statement-events-israel-palestine.html
Mayor
Zohran Mamdani on Thursday voiced no regrets about his handling of the third
anniversary of the Oct. 7 attacks, after his efforts to mark the day were
transformed into one of the most wrenching moments in his brief tenure leading
New York City.
Instead,
he reaffirmed his confidence in an approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
that had caused some Jewish New Yorkers and pro-Palestinian activists to assail
his leadership.
Asked
about Wednesday’s events at an unrelated news conference in Brooklyn, Mr.
Mamdani expressed no regrets about the statement
he had released to mark the anniversary. His statement inflamed
tensions with many Jewish leaders, who said it had focused too much on
Israel’s war in Gaza, and not enough on the people who had been killed or taken
hostage in Israel that day.
“It is
critically important to be able to mourn for all of those who were killed and
have been killed since, especially given that we know this is ongoing,” the
mayor said on Thursday. His intention, he said, had been to reckon with “a
horror that devastated the lives of New Yorkers three years ago and it also
continues to devastate New Yorkers today.”
Mr.
Mamdani said on Thursday that he had been clear, and would remain so, that he
believed Hamas had committed war crimes in its attacks on Israel on Oct. 7,
2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 hostages abducted. He
also said Israel had used that carnage to justify a prolonged assault on Gaza
that had led to the deaths of more than 74,000 Palestinians, actions that he
believed amount to genocide.
He
evinced no doubts about his decision to attend a vigil on Wednesday evening
organized by Israelis for Peace to honor those killed in both Israel and Gaza —
an event he also attended last year before his election. He did not address the
tense scene that developed when a group of pro-Palestinian activists disrupted
the gathering, heckled him and called him a “traitor.”
While
opposition to the mayor from pro-Israel Jewish leaders has become frequent, he
is less accustomed to being publicly jeered by fellow critics of Israel for
acknowledging the grief of Israelis and Jews.
But he
said on Thursday that New Yorkers would find a way to come together, despite
accusations from Jewish leaders that his focus on Israel has threatened the
safety of his Jewish constituents amid heightened fears about antisemitism and
violence.
There is
a political logic to the consistency of his message.
“As a
communications consultant and strategist, you would never tell your client to
flip-flop,” said Lupe Todd-Medina, a Democratic political consultant. “You’ve
got to own your position and stay there.”
But that
consistency did little to resolve the predicament facing Mr. Mamdani, who is
navigating a fraught relationship with Jewish leaders and growing skepticism
from some of his allies on the left.
The
Israeli-Palestinian conflict has dogged Mr. Mamdani since he took office in
January as New York City’s first Muslim mayor, a dyed-in-the-wool
pro-Palestinian activist and critic of Israel in a city that has a growing
Muslim population and remains 12 percent Jewish. As a mayoral candidate, he
promised to arrest the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, if he set
foot in the city.
His
unabashed stance on the issue, in a city where politicians have long been
almost reflexively pro-Israel, excited Muslims and young activists who
enthusiastically joined his coalition.
But
governing is different from campaigning.
It turned
out that he had no authority to arrest
Mr. Netanyahu, which his team had told him for months but which he only
publicly acknowledged in a video in July. That video rattled Jewish leaders,
who saw his sharp denunciations of Israel and its leader as a move to reassure
his base while distracting from his abandonment of a campaign promise.
In
August, during a meeting at City Hall, rabbis
beseeched the mayor to lower the temperature and to more carefully consider
how his words affected Jewish New Yorkers. And for a time, he seemed to retreat
from talking about the Middle East as often.
Tensions
resurfaced soon after when, amid the Jewish High Holiday season, the mayor’s
office released a report
on its efforts to combat antisemitism, which had risen across the United States
after the Oct. 7 attacks.
The
report steered clear of the thorny issue of Israel, but it nevertheless angered
some of Mr. Mamdani’s supporters, who flooded social media with accusations
that he was bowing to a Zionist agenda by highlighting hate crimes against
Jews, interpreting the notion of hate crimes too broadly, and providing funding
to a Jewish community group that supports Israel.
Dana Rubinstein covers
New York City politics and government for The Times.
Liam Stack is a Times reporter
who covers the culture and politics of the New York City region.
Sally Goldenberg is a
Times reporter covering New York City politics and government.




Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário