Ascension Day is do-or-die moment for Dutch
cabinet negotiations
May 6, 2024
Gordon Darroch
https://www.dutchnews.nl/2024/05/ascension-day-is-do-or-die-moment-for-dutch-cabinet-negotiations/
The talks
to form a new Dutch government are entering a make-or-break week after the four
right-wing parties submitted their financial plans to the budget analysis
bureau CPB.
The CPB is
due to report back on Wednesday, ahead of the Ascension Day holiday, so the
parties can discuss the results ahead of next week’s deadline to conclude the
third phase of negotiations.
All four
parties – the far-right PVV, right-wing liberal VVD, centre-right NSC and the
farmers’ party BBB – have agreed to abide by the Netherlands’ international
obligations, including a 3% budget deficit limit for countries that use the
euro.\
But the
differences in the parties’ spending plans have become a major sticking point
as the formation talks enter their sixth month. Formal talks resumed on Monday
after a 12-day break for the May recess.
The VVD are
the most hawkish of the four on public spending, with plans to cut the
international development budget by €5.5 billion, social security by €0.8
billion and healthcare spending by €0.2 billion. Geert Wilders’s PVV, by
contrast, wants to invest €7.7 billion in healthcare and €4.7 billion in social
security.
The VVD is
also the only one that allowed the CPB to evaluate its manifesto before the
election. The CPB found that the VVD would generate a budget deficit of 2.9%,
crucial for a party that has cultivated a reputation for fiscal responsibility.
NSC, the
party of Pieter Omtzigt, has been critical of the “model reality” used to
assess the effects of the parties’ policies, while the PVV’s plans were too
vague to be analysed reliably and the BBB said it was unable to meet the
deadline.
Budget deficits
A retired
CPB analyst, Wim Suyker, produced his own analysis of the parties’ manifestos
shortly before the election, which concluded that both BBB and NSC would exceed
the European limit, with deficits of 4.2% and 3.7% respectively. Suyker also
said the VVD would reduce the deficit to 2.5%.
The
formation talks briefly broke down in February when Omtzigt said the
constitutional differences between his party and Wilders’s PVV were too great
to be bridged.
He was
lured back to the negotiating table for the second phase with the promise that
the parties would form a “programme cabinet”, with half of the ministers
appointed on the basis of their expertise rather than membership of the
political parties.
Tensions on immigration
The third
stage of the talks began at the end of March with two lead negotiators, Richard
van Zwol and Elbert Dijkgraaf, who were given a deadline of May 15 to produce
an outline plan for government.
However,
the talks have stalled as the parties have been unable to reconcile Wilders’
demands for a drastic reduction in immigration numbers with Omtzigt’s
insistence that international treaties and European agreements must be upheld.
The current
talks are already the fourth most protracted in history, 166 days after the
election, while 10 months have passed since Mark Rutte’s government resigned in
a dispute over tighter asylum restrictions.
New elections?
Frans
Timmermans, the leader of the largest party not in the negotiations, the
left-wing alliance of Labour (PvdA) and GroenLinks, has called on the VVD to
open talks if there is no new government on the horizon by June 1.
“Something
needs to happen after half a year of nothing,” he said two weeks ago. “You
can’t keep people waiting for ever. The PVV, VVD, NSC and BBB are flogging a
dead horse.”
Opinion
polls, meanwhile, suggest the PVV is starting to lose support but could still
win around 30% of the vote if new elections were held now. NSC would be the big
losers, shedding around half of their 20 seats.
A survey
for EenVandaag also found that just 14% of VVD voters and 17% of NSC supporters
want to see their parties join a government with PvdA-FL, while 61% of all
voters would prefer another election.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário