Reeves
hints at rise in employer national insurance, as critics claim it breaches
manifesto
Chancellor
says businesses will understand balancing the books is necessary for fiscal
stability
Richard
Partington and Kiran Stacey
Mon 14 Oct
2024 19.07 BST
Rachel
Reeves has dropped her strongest hint yet that she is planning to raise
employer national insurance contributions in the budget, prompting accusations
Labour is about to break a manifesto promise.
The
chancellor used the government’s international investment summit at London’s
Guildhall on Monday to warn of tax rises to come in this month’s announcement,
insisting that business would understand the need for fiscal stability.
After days
of rumours that Reeves is planning to increase employer national insurance
contributions, the chancellor refused to rule out doing so, adding that
executives would understand the need for such decisions.
“We will
stick to the commitments we made in our manifesto,” she said. “But you know
there is a £22bn black hole over and above anything we knew about going into
the election that we need to fill, and that’s not just a one year, that
persists throughout the forecast period.
“So we are
going to need to sort of close that gap between what government is spending and
bringing in through tax receipts. But we are going to be a government that
sticks to our manifesto commitments, including that one [on not raising taxes
on working people].”
Introducing
national insurance on employer pension contributions could raise as much as
£17bn a year for the exchequer, while putting up regular employer national
insurance by 1p would raise about £8.5bn.
Reeves’s
message was underlined by Keir Starmer, who told the summit in his keynote
speech: “Our public services need urgent care, our public finances need the
tough love of prudence – challenges we can’t ignore. Because we know, just as
every leader here knows, that those early weeks and months are precious, and no
matter how many people advise you to ignore it, that you must run towards the
fire to put it out, not let it spread further.”
Speaking as
the government said nearly 38,000 UK jobs would be created after a total of
£63bn of international investment was announced in areas such as renewable
energy, datacentres and artificial intelligence, Reeves said tax rises on
employers would not count as anti-business.
“Unless you
put Britain on a stable economic and financial path, we’re not going to be able
to get that investment in,” she said. “And that will mean some difficult
decisions, including on taxation.
“But
businesses get that. They know that we have got to pay for day-to-day spending
through tax receipts, they want to see a path to balance the books, but we’ve
got to do it in a way that is also ensuring that we remain competitive in the
global economy.”
Reeves has
said she will have to take painful decisions in the budget because of the £22bn
hole that Labour says it inherited from the last government.
But critics
say that hiking employers’ national insurance contributions would directly
violate Labour’s manifesto commitment not to raise income tax, VAT or national
insurance.
Paul
Johnson, the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, told Times Radio on
Monday that such a move would count as a “straightforward breach” of the
manifesto. “I went back and read the manifesto and it says very clearly, we
will not raise rates of national insurance,” he said.
Jeremy Hunt,
the shadow chancellor, posted on X: “It’s obvious to most people that raising
national insurance would breach Labour’s manifesto pledge to … not raise
national insurance!”
“At a stroke
this will make every job in all our local communities more expensive to
maintain, which will see the current fall in job numbers in UK SMEs [small- and
medium-sized enterprises] gather pace. Fewer jobs and lower pay is not the way
forward.”
Labour
ministers, however, say the pledge referred to taxes on working people, and
therefore did not cover employer contributions.
Labour was
also accused of watering down its manifesto commitment to invest £7.3bn in the
national wealth fund, which it has set up to invest in green projects, after
confirming the fund would only get £5.8bn. Officials said the remaining £1.5bn
had been allocated elsewhere.
Reeves’s
comments on tax formed part of a careful balancing act the chancellor tried to
maintain on Monday as she wooed international corporations to invest more in
Britain while also being clear about the tax decisions to come.
The summit
was attended by high-level executives from a number of global companies,
including Google, BlackRock and GlaxoSmithKline.
Andrea
Rossi, the chief executive of M&G, a headline sponsor of the investment
summit, said he expected Reeves’s budget would be “pragmatic” and focused on
growth. However, he warned large tax rises risked “killing the economy”.
“You’re not
going to grow the economy if you tax the economy much, much more,” he said.
It was the
attendance of the Dubai-owned DP World that caused the most attention however,
after the company originally threatened to pull out after Louise Haigh, the
transport secretary, called P&O Ferries, which it owns, a “rogue operator”.
DP World
confirmed it would spend £1bn on the London Gateway port project in Essex,
despite the row, after Starmer publicly rebuked his transport secretary. Haigh
also attended the summit, although did not make any public comments.
Other
investments were focused on green energy, such as a £2bn commitment to new
solar farms from Octopus Energy, and on technology, including £10bn from
Blackstone for a new datacentre in Northumberland.
As the final
part of the government’s business charm offensive, Elton John was brought in to
serenade guests at a reception at St Paul’s Cathedral also attended by King
Charles.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário