Op-Ed: Kevin McCarthy’s speaker-election fiasco
has been brewing in the GOP for years
BY KURT
BARDELLA
JAN. 3,
2023 3:04 PM PT
Tossing
concessions left and right, and still falling short, Kevin McCarthy found out
the hard way what happens when you try to bargain your way to victory.
The
historic chaos that unfolded on the floor of the House of Representatives on
Tuesday afternoon didn’t happen in a vacuum. It was years in the making.
To understand
why, for the first time in more than a century, multiple ballots were required
in an effort to elect a speaker of the House, you have to go back more than
eight years to June 10, 2014. That night, the sitting House Majority Leader
Eric Cantor lost his primary to right-wing challenger Dave Brat.
At the
time, Cantor was a part of a trifecta dubbed “The Young Guns” with Rep. Paul
Ryan and — you guessed it — McCarthy. The trio represented the next generation
of leadership for House Republicans. Cantor was pegged as the would-be
speaker-in-waiting, McCarthy his loyal deputy and Ryan controlling the policy
agenda. It was the perfect succession plan … until Cantor was pushed off the
ballot by his district’s voters back in Virginia.
Back then,
names like Steve Bannon, Breitbart and Laura Ingraham were considered to be on
the fringes of the Republican Party. They weren’t power brokers. They had no
proximity to influential leaders in the party. But in supporting Brat and
taking out Cantor, this extreme wing of the GOP claimed its first victory over
the so-called establishment. It then propelled the “red wave” of the 2014
midterms, clinching Republican control of the House and winning the Senate.
A year
later, the fringe claimed another victory, creating an untenable environment
for Speaker John Boehner that concluded with his resignation. With Cantor gone,
all eyes turned to McCarthy to step into the speaker’s chair. On the eve of the
vote, the House Freedom Caucus released a public statement announcing their opposition
to McCarthy. McCarthy withdrew from the race 24 hours later, paving the way for
Paul Ryan to become speaker. Two years later, Ryan would retire from Congress
as Democrats and Rep. Nancy Pelosi ascended to power. The radical wing was not
defeated, just gathering strength.
Time and
again, we’ve seen a vocal minority within the Republican conference exert an
inordinate amount of influence over the majority. Each time, with each
conflict, the response from the Republican leadership was to back down or fold.
That reflex
to pander to the most extreme voices within their party is what allowed
President Trump to hijack it. For Trump, it wasn’t even difficult. The party
simply surrendered to him as his novelty candidacy gathered attention during
the 2016 presidential primary.
What could
possibly fuel the radical fringe more successfully than putting a like-minded
person in the White House? Trump’s legacy is an energized cadre of politicians
whose policy platform seems to simply be “burn it all down.”
Painful as
it was to watch the GOP lurch toward Trump in 2016, we’ve seen the same pattern
with the party’s reaction to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Rather
than break from Trump and denounce the extremist elements within their
conference that stoked the flames of violent insurrection, today’s Republican
Party has once again retreated from the battlefield and has looked to placate
the domestic terrorists involved in the Capitol siege.
Is it any
wonder that on Tuesday afternoon, 19 insurrection-loving extremists felt like
they could successfully hold hostage a conference of 222? This has long been
predictable. History has taught them that when push comes to shove, the
Republican “leadership” will always back down.
At this
point, in many ways, it doesn’t even matter whether McCarthy is successful in
his quest to become speaker. If he does, he will limp into the office,
positioned as the weakest speaker in modern history. He will have lost control
of the chamber before he once grasped the gavel.
There’s a
reason the official policy of the United States government is to not negotiate
with terrorists, domestic or otherwise. That approach merely encourages them.
Kurt
Bardella is a contributing writer to Opinion. He is a Democratic strategist and
a former senior advisor for Republicans on the House Oversight Committee. @KurtBardella
.webp)

.jpg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário