Michigan
Enough with militias. Let’s call them what they
really are: domestic terrorists
Arwa
Mahdawi
This week the FBI announced charges in a plot to
kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Much of the coverage referred to them as a militia –
and the governor wasn’t having it
Sat 10 Oct
2020 14.00 BSTLast modified on Sat 10 Oct 2020 14.16 BST
Militia
(noun): misunderstood white men. Groups of heavily armed individuals whose
actions, while not exactly ideal, deserve compassion and should be looked at
within a wider socioeconomic context. Instead of rushing to judgment or making
generalisations, one must consider the complex causes (economic anxiety, video
games, mental health issues) that have triggered these poor guys into
committing mass murder, conspiring to violently overthrow the state or plotting
to kidnap government officials.
I’m afraid
to say that the misunderstood white men have struck again – or attempted to, at
least. On Thursday 13 men were charged in relation to an alleged plot to kidnap
Michigan’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer. The plan was to, “grab the
bitch”, as they put it, and then try her for “treason”. The eventual goal being
to create “a society that followed the US Bill of Rights and where they could
be self-sufficient”.
Much of the
media coverage of Whitmer’s would-be kidnappers referred to them as members of
a Michigan militia group called Wolverine Watchmen. The wolverine, by the way,
isn’t just a Marvel character – it’s an animal that looks like a small bear but
is actually part of the weasel family. This seems appropriate because “militia”
is very much a weasel word. It’s a way to avoid putting white extremists in the
same bucket as brown people. It lends them legitimacy. It obfuscates what these
people really are.
Governor
Whitmer, to her immense credit, was having none of it. “They’re not
‘militias’,” she tweeted on Friday morning. “They’re domestic terrorists
endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.”
Donald
Trump’s words, in particular, matter. In April the president tweeted “LIBERATE
MICHIGAN!” as far-right protesters, many of them armed, railed against
stay-at-home orders imposed by Whitmer. Protesters waving semi-automatic rifles
later tried to storm the state capitol. “The Governor of Michigan should give a
little, and put out the fire,” Trump wrote on 1 May. “These are very good
people, but they are angry.”
Trump’s
words, Whitmer said in televised comments on Thursday, had served as a
“rallying cry” to far-right extremists. Not only had the president refused to
condemn white supremacists, he stood on the debate stage last week and told the
Proud Boys, a violently racist gang, to “stand back and stand by”. When our
leaders “stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit”, Whitmer
said.
It’s not
just the White House that’s complicit, it’s the media. Kyle Rittenhouse, for
example, the 17-year-old accused of killing two protesters in Wisconsin last
month, was celebrated as a vigilante by rightwing outlets. “How shocked are we
that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one
else would?” Tucker Carlson asked on Fox News. Far-right pundit Ann Coulter
tweeted that she wanted the teenager “as my president”. The New York Post,
meanwhile, published photos of Rittenhouse cleaning up graffiti; he was framed
as a concerned citizen rather than a cold-blooded killer.
To be
clear: double standards aren’t just a rightwing media problem. A study
conducted by Georgia State University last year found that terror attacks
carried out by Muslims receive on average 357% more media coverage than those
committed by other groups. While this is clearly racist, it’s also dangerous.
White supremacists, plenty of evidence shows, are the deadliest domestic threat
facing the US. By downplaying the threat of white nationalist terrorism, by
finding politer ways to refer to it, the media have allowed it to proliferate.
So please, let’s call things by their name. Enough with the “militias”, these
people are terrorists.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário