Oversight
members split over whether to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, committee chair says
The only
convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein has said she would testify to Congress
if granted clemency — a power held solely by the president.
Hailey
Fuchs
04/22/2026,
5:14pm ET
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/04/22/congress/to-pardon-maxwell-or-not-00887823
Members
on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee are divided over whether
President Donald Trump should pardon Jeffrey Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator
Ghislaine Maxwell in exchange for her cooperation in the panel’s Epstein
investigation, Chair James Comer said in an interview Wednesday.
Maxwell,
who was deposed by the Oversight Committee as the sole convicted accomplice in
the Epstein sex trafficking scheme, previously invoked her Fifth Amendment
right in declining to answer the panel’s questions. Her lawyer has said that
she would only speak if granted clemency — a power available solely to Trump,
who has not ruled out the prospect of a pardon.
When
asked whether he believed it was a favorable deal to issue a pardon in return
for Maxwell’s testimony, Comer said, “A lot of people do.”
“My
committee’s split on that,” he added, declining to name who on the panel
supported granting a pardon. “I don’t speak for my committee.”
Comer
himself wasn’t in favor.
“I think
it looks bad,” he said. “Honestly, other than Epstein, the worst person in this
whole investigation is Maxwell.”
Rep.
Robert Garcia of California, the Oversight panel’s top Democrat, emphasized
that committee Democrats unanimously opposed a pardon for Maxwell.
“That
would be a huge step backwards, and, quite frankly, so disrespectful to the
survivors,” he said in an interview. “She is a known abuser. She is a known
liar.”
“If the
DOJ or Oversight Republicans are out there trying to negotiate some sort of
pardon that is … not only a huge slap in the face to this investigation, to
anyone, to the American public,” he added. “It’s a part of a massive cover up.”
Pressure
has been mounting on the Justice Department to pursue new prosecutions in the
Epstein case, particularly after the United Kingdom arrested Andrew
Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, and former Ambassador
Peter Mandelson for crimes related to their association with the disgraced
financier.
The
Oversight Committee’s probe’s work has been complicated by the fact that
Maxwell is unwilling to answer questions and the central figure, Epstein, died
behind bars years ago. Maxwell’s lawyer David Oscar Markus told POLITICO in an
extended interview last month that he believed there was a good chance his
client would ultimately be pardoned by the president.
Markus
said he reached out to then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last year to
help facilitate Maxwell’s interview with the Department of Justice. She was
granted limited immunity for that two-day conversation and moved to a minimum
security prison camp shortly afterward.
In her
interview with Blanche, she emphasized that she had not seen Trump engage in
impropriety with Epstein. The president’s relationship with Epstein has been
the source of much intrigue, as Trump has maintained the two had a falling out
years ago.
Garcia
said the Oversight Committee should investigate why and how Maxwell was moved
to a different facility after her interview with Blanche.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário