EU
countries eye setting up migrant ‘return hubs’ in Rwanda and Uzbekistan
Push
marks fresh test of Europe’s effort to outsource migration controls after years
of legal setbacks and political controversy.
June 24,
2026 4:00 am CET
By
Sebastian Starcevic and Nektaria Stamouli
BRUSSELS
— A group of EU countries is considering sending rejected asylum seekers to
Rwanda and Uzbekistan, three European diplomats confirmed, as the bloc moves to
shift part of its migrant returns system beyond its borders for the first time.
The plans
follow the approval of a law granting EU capitals the power to set up centers
in non-EU countries for processing migrants who have been denied the right to
stay in the bloc — so-called return hubs — provided those countries uphold
human rights and international law. Over half of the EU’s 27 member countries
called this month for swift action establishing the centers, in a letter seen
by POLITICO.
Denmark,
Austria, Greece, Germany and the Netherlands have spearheaded the push to
process rejected asylum seekers offshore. “Our goal is to conclude the first
agreements for the creation of these structures in 2026, so that they are
operational from 2027,” Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said ahead of
the law’s approval.
The
countries hosting the centers have not yet been decided and the political and
diplomatic process still needs to play out, two other European diplomats said.
The plans
follow a series of controversial attempts by European governments to move
migration management beyond the continent’s borders. Britain’s Rwanda plans
were scrapped last year after years of legal and political battles, while
Italy’s migrant centers in Albania have been repeatedly challenged in court.
Backers say the EU’s new rules could succeed where earlier efforts struggled by
providing a clear legal framework for offshore facilities.
Although
governments are eyeing Rwanda and Uzbekistan, and this has been confirmed at
the EU level, it would still be for individual governments to strike their own
deals. The Commission, which has not been part of the talks to choose the
countries, and other EU capitals have to be informed before the hubs start
operating.
The EU
has funneled hundreds of millions of euros into Rwanda through its Global
Gateway program, announcing a €900 million investment in 2023. The bloc has
also allocated €119 million in grant funding to Uzbekistan.
Another
country being discussed behind closed doors is Uganda, said a senior European
official from one of the core group countries, granted anonymity like the
others to discuss the confidential plans. Countries geographically close to the
bloc, such as Egypt and Libya, have been ruled out due to concerns around the
risk of people smuggling, the official said.
Cyprus’
Migration Minister Nicholas Ioannides said ahead of the approval of the returns
hub law that the “general idea” is to set up the centers “maybe in Africa or
Asia,” but “not close to European borders.”
Ioannides
said the protection of human rights will be a “yardstick” for the agreements,
and the EU wants international organizations such as the International
Organization for Migration and the U.N. refugee agency to help make sure the
rules are upheld.
Uphill
battle
The EU is
falling prey to “populist rhetoric” and “alternative facts” about migrants,
said Jean-Nicolas Beuze, UNHCR’s representative in Brussels. Refugees ran “the
risk of being sent to a country” where they could “suffer irreparable harm,” he
told POLITICO.
Some
countries, including France and Spain, have challenged the scheme. “I have
never seen a return center in a third
country that actually works,” French President Emmanuel Macron said in Brussels last week,
adding, “I’m not sure that’s what our Europe is about.”
Greens
MEP Mélissa Camara, who was her group’s lead negotiator on the EU’s new
migration rules, told POLITICO that establishing return hubs outside the bloc’s
borders “breaches the EU core values of dignity and compliance with fundamental
rights.”
“By
creating such hubs in Uzbekistan or Rwanda, we will therefore have no guarantee
at all the human rights are complied with,” she added.
Under the
new EU rules — which were passed in the European Parliament to chants of “send
them home” from right-wing and far-right MEPs — the return hubs would house
people who have already exhausted all their legal avenues to stay in the bloc
and are awaiting deportation.
That
differs from earlier offshore migration plans in Britain, Denmark and Italy,
which focused on asylum seekers or newly arrived migrants. Those efforts
struggled to gain traction: Italy’s Albania centers have been tied up in
litigation, Denmark’s Rwanda plans stalled, and Britain’s Rwanda scheme was
abandoned after years of legal challenges.
Gerardo
Fortuna, Nick Vinocur and Max Griera contributed to this report.
.jpeg)

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário