Opinion
Michelle
Goldberg
Why Is
Ghislaine Maxwell Being Pampered in Prison?
Nov. 14,
2025
Michelle
Goldberg
By
Michelle Goldberg
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/14/opinion/ghislaine-maxwell-trump-epstein-prison.html
Opinion
Columnist
This
week, Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland, revealed that a whistle-blower gave
the House Judiciary Committee information about the special treatment that
Ghislaine Maxwell is receiving at the minimum-security federal prison she was
recently transferred to.
In a
letter to Donald Trump, Raskin wrote that Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year
sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation, has had
custom meals delivered to her cell. The warden, he said, personally arranged
for Maxwell to meet privately with family members and other visitors and even
provided snacks and refreshments. According to Raskin, her guests were allowed
to bring computers, potentially allowing her unauthorized communication with
the outside world.
Maxwell
was allegedly taken to the prison’s exercise room after hours so she could work
out alone, and “allowed to enjoy recreation time in staff-only areas,” wrote
Raskin. An inmate who trains service dogs was reportedly instructed to give her
special access to a puppy. Raskin claimed that a top official at the prison
said that he is “sick of having to be Maxwell’s bitch.”
Some of
the details in Raskin’s letter were confirmed on Thursday by CNN, which added
one more. Whereas other inmates carefully conserve their toilet paper because
they’re given only two rolls a week, CNN reported, Maxwell “is given as much
toilet paper as she needs. All she has to do is ask.”
What’s
shocking here is not that Maxwell is being treated decently — all prisoners
should be — but that she’s being treated so much better than everyone else. The
relative pampering she’s enjoying seems particularly significant given newly
released emails between her and Epstein suggesting she’s harboring some sort of
secret about Trump.
On
Wednesday, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released three messages
from a tranche they’d received from Epstein’s estate. (Perhaps trying to drown
them out, Republicans then released more than 20,000 more.) “I want you to
realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is Trump,” Epstein wrote to Maxwell in
2011. One of his victims, Epstein wrote, “spent hours at my house with him. He
has never once been mentioned.” Maxwell responded, “I have been thinking about
that.”
Much
about this email is ambiguous. Epstein could have been suggesting that Trump
was keeping something quiet. Or he might have been expressing surprise that
Trump hadn’t yet been dragged into his mess. Presumably, Maxwell could clear
things up and explain the exact nature of Trump and Epstein’s entanglement.
That’s why it’s striking that the Bureau of Prisons — which is part of the
Justice Department — seems to be taking such extraordinary steps to keep her
happy. Maybe there’s an innocent explanation for all the privileges she’s being
accorded, but I can’t think of one.
Recall
that on July 22, after Trump’s Justice Department and F.B.I. essentially closed
the Epstein case, the House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Maxwell to
testify. That day, Todd Blanche, the former Trump defense attorney now serving
as deputy attorney general, announced he’d interview Maxwell himself. When they
met, she told him she’d never witnessed Trump doing anything untoward. (She
said the same of Epstein.)
Just days
after speaking to Blanche, Maxwell was moved to a federal prison camp in Bryan,
Texas, a much less restrictive facility with a reputation for relative comfort.
The transfer was highly unusual because, under Bureau of Prisons policy,
convicted sex offenders like Maxwell are not typically eligible for minimum
security.
Many
inside the system, Raskin told me, are upset about all the exceptions
apparently being made for her. “There are lots of people in the prison, and
there are lots of people in the government, who are extremely disenchanted with
the favoritism and indulgences being showered upon Ghislaine Maxwell,” he said.
These
indulgences look like part of a broader pattern. We’ve seen in recent days how
desperate Trump is to keep the Justice Department’s Epstein files from coming
out. For months now, Representatives Ro Khanna, a Democrat, and Thomas Massie,
a Republican, have been collecting signatures on a so-called discharge petition
to override House leadership and force a vote on the files’ release. This week,
they got the signature they needed to put their measure over the top, thanks to
the swearing in of Adelita Grijalva, Democrat of Arizona.
One of a
handful of House Republicans to sign onto the petition was Lauren Boebert,
usually a MAGA loyalist. On Wednesday, CNN reported that she’d been summoned to
the Situation Room to meet with Blanche, Attorney General Pam Bondi and the
F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, to discuss the files. Boebert, who didn’t reverse
her stance, denied that they’d tried to pressure her. But it’s extraordinary to
have the leading law enforcement officials in the nation seemingly working to
stop the vote, especially since even if the measure gets to Trump’s desk, he
can just veto it.
The
emails released this week don’t get us much closer to understanding what Trump
could be hiding. Indeed, an email Epstein sent a few months before his arrest
in 2019 suggests that while Trump might have been aware of Epstein’s child
abuse, he didn’t participate in it. “He never got a massage,” Epstein wrote.
Yet Epstein also seemed confident that he knew something damaging about Trump.
“I am the one able to take him down,” he said in a 2018 text message about
Trump.
Of
course, Epstein was a self-aggrandizing criminal. The question remains: Why is
Trump acting like he was right?


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário