Vance
Says He Hopes His Wife Embraces Christianity, Setting Off Backlash
Critics
included some Indian Americans, who said the remarks did not respect the
religious decisions of Usha Vance, who grew up in a Hindu household.
Amy Qin
By Amy
Qin
Oct. 31,
2025
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/31/us/politics/usha-jd-vance-christianity-religion-hindu.html
Vice
President JD Vance provoked a broad backlash this week after he said that he
hoped that his wife, Usha Vance, who is of Indian heritage and was raised in a
Hindu family, would eventually convert to his own Catholic faith.
“Do I
hope eventually that she is somehow moved by the same thing that I was moved by
in church?” he said during an event at the University of Mississippi on
Wednesday, in response to a question from the audience. “Yeah, I honestly do
wish that because I believe in the Christian Gospel, and I hope eventually my
wife comes to see it the same way.”
The
comments, which were made in front of thousands of students as part of a
Turning Point USA event honoring the slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk,
were widely reported by news media outlets and quickly criticized on social
media.
Beyond
partisan salvos, there was also criticism from some Indians and Indian
Americans across the political spectrum who said that Mr. Vance was not
respecting his wife’s religious decisions. Some also said his remarks suggested
that Hinduism was inferior at a time when aggressive immigration enforcement
has left many South Asian Americans and people of non-Christian faiths feeling
uncertain and afraid of their place in American society.
The
backlash reflected worries by some in the South Asian community over the Trump
administration’s immigration policies and its embrace of conservative Christian
groups.
Suhag
Shukla, executive director of the Hindu American Foundation, described Mr.
Vance’s remarks as “basically saying that my wife, this aspect of her is just
not enough.”
“If you
were any ordinary pastor, then whatever,” said Ms. Shukla, who has been
critical of both Democrats and Republicans in the past. “But he’s not the
pastor in chief, he’s the vice president wanting to be president.”
“There’s
a lot of uncertainty in the community,” Ms. Shukla said. “This just added kind
of fuel to those fears.”
Mrs.
Vance has not responded publicly to her husband’s comments or the backlash. But
on Friday, Mr. Vance responded to the upswell of criticism. In a reply to a
commenter on X who accused him of throwing his wife’s religion “under the bus,”
Mr. Vance called the message “disgusting” and full of “anti-Christian bigotry.”
He also
called Mrs. Vance the “most amazing blessing” in his life, noting that he had
also said that at the Turning Point event. He said that she had encouraged him
to re-engage with his faith and that while he still wished that she would
convert, he would “continue to love and support her” regardless.
It is not
unusual for people in interfaith relationships, and especially for Christians
across denominations, to hope for their partners to convert. And the Roman
Catholic Church teaches that baptism is required for salvation.
Raised in
a loosely evangelical family, Mr. Vance has described himself as going through
an “angry, atheist phase” before later converting to Catholicism. Mr. Vance’s
embrace of the Catholic faith is evident in his politics, as seen through his
frequent emphasis on traditional family principles, social conservatism and
economic populism.
Mrs.
Vance, who was born and raised in Southern California by parents who immigrated
from India, has spoken about growing up in a religious Hindu household. The
couple, who first met when they were studying at Yale Law School, have spoken
publicly before about her role in Mr. Vance’s conversion and their approach to
raising their three children in an intercultural and interfaith household.
In a June
interview on Meghan McCain’s podcast, Mrs. Vance said that while the children
went to Catholic school, they could choose whether they wanted to be baptized.
“The kids
know that I’m not Catholic, and they have plenty of access to the Hindu
tradition from books that we give them, to things that we show them, to the
visit recently to India and some of the religious elements of that visit,” she
said. “So it is a part of their lives and they know many practicing Hindus as a
part of their lives in their own family.”
These
family issues, though, can take on a different valence when placed within a
broader political and historical context.
There is
a sensitivity in India to proselytizing by non-Hindus because of the long
history of Muslim rule and Christian missionary work.
Mr.
Vance’s comments also appeared to have struck a nerve at a time when rhetoric
against immigrants has been growing. An August report from Stop AAPI Hate, a
coalition that tracks acts of violence against Asian Americans, documented
recent spikes in online hate rhetoric against South Asians related mainly to
the mayoral run of Zohran Mamdani and the ongoing debate around H-1B visas.
Earlier
this month, a City Council member in Palm Bay, Fla., was censured over a series
of social media messages in which he disparaged Indians as coming to the United
States to “drain our pockets” and called for them to be deported en masse. The
member, Chandler Langevin, is now suing the city of Palm Bay saying that the
censure restrictions violated his First Amendment right to free speech.
Sangay
Mishra, an associate professor at Drew University and the author of “Desis
Divided: The Political Lives of South Asian Americans,” said that Mr. Vance’s
comments may have come from a deeply personal place, but they were interpreted
by some as effectively “nodding to these larger politics of anti-immigration,
anti-migrants, anti-replacement theory and white Christian nationalism.”
Not all
Indian Americans were bothered by Mr. Vance’s comments.
Rami
Reddy Mutyala is chairman of Shri Mandir, a Hindu temple in San Diego that Mrs.
Vance’s parents occasionally attend. Even though he is a Republican, he said
that he disapproved of President Trump, who he said was acting like a
“monarch.”
But he
saw nothing wrong with the vice president’s remarks.
“They are
adults, they can decide whatever is good for them,” he said. “We cannot force
anybody — even I cannot force my children to convert to Hinduism.”
Elizabeth
Dias contributed reporting.
Amy Qin
writes about Asian American communities for The Times.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário