How Frans
Timmermans’ EU job destroyed his Dutch political career
Europe’s
Social Democrats mourn the loss of their biggest hope for a comeback.
October
30, 2025 6:02 pm CET
By Max
Griera
THE HAGUE
— Frans Timmermans rose to the pinnacle of European Union politics.
But it
was his own Brussels legacy that sabotaged his attempt to defeat the far right.
Timmermans
resigned as the leader of the GreenLeft-Labor alliance Wednesday night after a
stunning underperformance in the Dutch general election, with the party losing
five seats since the last election and ending up in fourth place.
“It’s
clear that I, for whatever reason, couldn’t convince people to vote for us,”
Timmermans said in a speech in Rotterdam after the exit polls were published
Wednesday night. “It’s time that I take a step back and transfer the leading of
our movement to the next generation.”
The
pan-European Party of European Socialists considered Timmermans living proof
that progressive, left-wing politics are in for a comeback after a decade of
losing ground to the right.
To them,
Timmermans was an international statesman with a real a chance at scoring the
Netherlands’ premiership, 23 years since the last government led by Social
Democrats.
But for
Dutch voters, he was unable to shake his reputation as an outsider and elitist.
And it was precisely that international experience that doomed him as a stodgy
statesman in The Hague.
As a
European commissioner for nearly a decade, half of it spent as Commission
President Ursula von der Leyen’s second-in-command, Timmermans delivered the
flagship EU Green Deal package to fight climate change.
The
ailing GreenLeft-Labor alliance — which only recently began an official merger
process — also put stock in Timmermans, bringing him back home to lead the
charge against the surge of far-right Party for Freedom (PVV) in the national
election of 2023. But his party failed to win the top slot, and was sidelined
in government formation.
Party
leaders on the right demonized Timmermans, branding him as a green fanatic who
would misspend taxpayer cash, should he be given the chance to govern.
Dilan
Yeşilgöz, the leader of Mark Rutte’s liberal People’s Party for Freedom and
Democracy (VVD), called him “arrogant” and “elitist” on several occasions — as
did other leaders.
Hopes for
Timmerman rose again this past June when the right-wing government, led by
Geert Wilders’ PVV, collapsed. With all major parties now pledging to sideline
the far right, and with favorable polls placing his party second after PVV,
Timmermans seemed to have another shot at leading the next Dutch government.
But much
as he tried, Timmermans failed to get rid of his EU past and lead his own
country.
Brussels
arrogance
During
the EU election in 2019, Timmermans was the lead candidate of the European
Socialists, campaigning across EU countries and on many occasions speaking the
local tongue — as he is fluent in six languages. This impressive international
flair earned him supporters in Brussels — but not so much in his home country.
Since his
return to Dutch politics, Timmermans’ problem has been that he is seen as an
intellectual focused on foreign affairs, coming from the outside to lecture
Dutch voters, campaign expert Alex Klusman and Leiden University politics
professor Sarah de Lange told POLITICO ahead of the vote.
“He has a
handicap, because he’s perceived as this relatively well-off cosmopolitan” — an
image that creates tension with the idea of defending “the interests of
ordinary Dutch citizens,” said de Lange.
Over the
years, Timmermans has grappled with being seen as arrogant after years of
keeping his head out of the country — first, as state secretary of EU affairs
and minister of foreign affairs for seven years, followed by his tenure at the
European Commission for nine years, said Klusman, who is the CEO of the BKB
campaigning agency.
When he
came back to the Netherlands in 2023, Dutch citizens saw Timmermans as someone
who was lecturing them — “telling them what to do, and at the same time
somebody who had lost complete contact with what the Netherlands had become,”
Klusman said. By that time, Klusman pointed out, the country had become widely
dominated by right-wing politicians distrustful of the EU.
For a man
who had been in charge of devising the core of the Green Deal — now used in a
counter-campaign by portraying it as killing Europe’s businesses — it was not a
smooth landing.
An
article by Dutch newspaper NRC ahead of the vote argued that GreenLeft-Labor is
increasingly associated with words like elitist, cosmopolitan and moralistic.
“This
image, partly the result of years of hard work by Geert Wilders, has stuck with
many voters,” the analysis said. “GreenLeft-Labor is finding it difficult to
shake that off.”
Timmermans
himself was keenly aware of that image, which he fought hard to leave behind.
The
perception of him as an outsider in his own country, Timmermans said when asked
by POLITICO prior to the Dutch vote, “was very relevant two years ago when I
came back — but last year, year-and-a-half, this has not been an issue.”
“People
remember that I was in government, that I was in the European Commission. But
it’s no longer ‘the guy who comes to lecture us,’ because I’ve been active in
Dutch politics again for two full years in the forefront of national politics,”
he added.
Failed
makeover
Timmermans
indeed worked hard to change his image. He sought to convey a more energetic,
healthier politician campaigning across the country, while living in his
hometown Maastricht to show he is connected to his roots.
That
makeover included dramatic weight loss after a gastric bypass surgery he
underwent a year ago — which he descrribed at length in an interview with Dutch
daily De Telegraaf, known to be especially critical of Timmermans, to try make
him more palatable to right-wing voters.
But,
according to Klusman, key for Timmermans were the “two years of humbleness
lessons” doing parliamentary work as opposition leader after he lost the
election in 2023.
“In the
beginning, he would never say that he wasn’t right, that he made a wrong remark
or a wrong position in a debate,” said Klusman. But “now he’d think, and then
he’d say, ‘no, I made a mistake.’” Timmermans began to listen instead of
lecture, Klusman added.
As the
EU’s Green Deal architect, he brought the message home by focusing on the
social aspects of climate change — for example, Timmermans tapped the narrative
that building out renewable energy will reduce the energy bills for Dutch
households.
But
despite all efforts, personal opinion ratings a few days before the election
showed the wider Dutch population did not like Timmermans, giving him among the
lowest grades on Oct. 27.
Eva
Hartog and Hanne Cokelaere contributed to this report.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário