King
Charles will warn Trump about the fate of the planet. Trump probably won’t
listen.
King Charles
III is a lifelong environmentalist. Donald Trump is unraveling global efforts
to combat climate change. Insiders expect the king to have a second go at
swaying the president when the two meet this week.
Without
global action on the climate, Charles wrote back in 2010, the world is on “the
brink of potential disaster.” |
September
15, 2025 7:00 pm CET
By
Charlie Cooper
https://www.politico.eu/article/the-king-will-warn-donald-trump-fate-planet-climate-change/
LONDON —
It was June 2019, and the president of the United States was taking tea with
the future British king.
The
meeting between Donald Trump and then Prince Charles was scheduled to last 15
minutes. It stretched to an hour and a half.
Trump
could barely get a word in edgeways. Charles did “most of the talking,” the
president told a TV interviewer the day after they met.
One topic
dominated. “He is …” Trump said, hesitating momentarily, “... he is really into
climate change.”
Without
global action on the climate, Charles wrote back in 2010, the world is on “the
brink of potential disaster.” At the London royal residence Clarence House
during Trump's first U.K. state visit, face-to-face with its most powerful
inhabitant, Charles decided to speak on behalf of the planet.
It was
tea with a side of climate catastrophe.
Six years
on, the stage is set for Charles — now king — to try to sway the president
again. A second term Trump — bolder, brasher, and no less destructive to global
efforts to tackle climate change — is heading back to the U.K. for an
unprecedented second state visit and to another meeting with the king. They
meet at Windsor Castle on Wednesday.
In the
years between the two visits — with extreme weather events, wildfires and
flooding increasingly attributed to a changing climate — Charles' convictions
have only strengthened, say those who know him well.
“His
views have not changed and will not change. If anything I think he feels it,
probably, more strongly than ever,” said the broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby, a
friend and biographer of the king. “It seems self-evident to me, therefore,
that he would regard President Trump's attitude towards climate change and the
environment as potentially calamitous.”
But
stakes are higher for the king in 2025 than in 2019. The meeting represents an
extraordinary influencing opportunity for a monarch who has spent his life
deploying “soft power” in the service of cherished environmental causes. But
now he is head of state, any overtly political conversation about climate
change risks stress-testing the U.K.’s constitutional settlement between
government and monarch.
Charles
has a duty, says constitutional expert Craig Prescott, to “support the
[elected] government of the day in what they want to achieve in foreign
relations.”
And “in a
broad sense,” he added, “that means ‘getting on the good side of Trump.’”
Labour’s
focus on an ambitious green transition, though, gives the king some leeway to
speak in favor of international climate action.
Both Dimbleby and Ian Skelly, a former speechwriter for Charles who
co-wrote his 2010 book Harmony, expect him to do exactly that.
“I would
be astonished if in this meeting, as at the last meeting , he does not raise
the issue of climate change and biodiversity in any chance he has to speak
privately to Trump,” said Dimbleby.
The king
will be “diplomatic,” Dimbleby added, and would heed his “constitutional duty,”
avoiding “saying anything that will allow Trump to think there is a bus ticket
between him and the British government. ... But he won’t avoid the issue. He
cares about it too much.”
“He knows
exactly where the limits are,” said Skelly. “He’s not going to start banging
the table or anything. ... He will outline his concerns in general terms, I
have no doubt about that — and perhaps warn the most powerful person in the
world about the dangers of doing nothing.”
Buckingham
Palace and Downing Street declined to comment when asked whether the king would
raise climate with Trump, or whether this has been discussed in preparations
for the state visit.
Have you
read my book, Mr. President?
In the
time since that tea at Clarence House, the President has shown no sign that
Charles’ entreaties on the part of the planet had any impact. (And they didn’t
have much effect at the time, by one insider's account. Trump complained the
conversation “had been terrible,” wrote former White House Press Secretary
Stephanie Grisham in her memoir.
“‘Nothing but climate change,’ he groused, rolling his eyes.”)
The U.S.
has once again withdrawn from the Paris climate accords. Trump’s Department of
Energy has rejected established climate science. America’s fossil fuel firms
and investors — some of whom helped Trump get elected — have been invited to
“Drill, baby, drill.”
With
America out of the fight, the world’s chances of avoiding the direst
consequences of climate change have taken a serious blow.
Charles,
on the other hand, has only grown more convinced that climate change,
unchecked, will cause “inevitable catastrophes,” as he put it in Harmony, his
cri-de-coeur on saving the planet.
Dimbleby
predicted that, this time around, one subtle way allowing the king to make his
point would be to gift Trump a copy of that book — a treatise on
environmentalism, traditional wisdom and sustainability that diagnoses “a
spiritual void” in modern societies, a void which has “opened the way for what
many people see as an excessive personal focus.”
“I’m sure
[the king] won’t let [Trump] out of his sight before giving him a copy,” said
Dimbleby. Chinese Premier (and Trump’s main geopolitical rival) Xi Jinping
already has a copy, said Skelly.
But the
meeting comes at a time when Prime Minister Keir Starmer — boxed in politically
by the need to keep the U.S. on side for the sake of trade, Ukraine and
European security — has avoided openly criticizing the Trump administration’s
attacks on climate science or its embrace of fossil fuels.
His
government will not want the king to say or do anything that upsets
transatlantic relations. Even when the president, sitting next to Starmer,
trashed wind energy — the main pillar of U.K. decarbonization plans — on a
July visit to his Turnberry golf course in Scotland, the prime minister
mustered no defense beyond quietly insisting the U.K. was pursuing a “mix” of
energy sources.
If Trump
starts railing against windmills again in his chat to the king, he might get a
(slightly) more robust response, predicted Skelly. “The response to that will
be: ‘What else are we going to do without destroying the Earth?’ That’s the
question he’ll come back with, I’d imagine.”
How to
talk to Trump about climate
Some who
have worked with Trump think that, because of the unique place Britain and the
royals occupy in his worldview, Charles stands a better chance than most in
getting the president to listen.
“President
Trump isn’t going to become an environmentalist over a cup of tea with the
king. But I think he’ll definitely hear him out — in a way that maybe he
wouldn’t with other folks,” said Michael Martins, founder of the firm Overton
Advisory, who was a political and economic specialist at the U.S. embassy in
London during the last state visit.
“He likes
the pageantry. He likes the optics of it. … Engaging with a king, Trump will
feel he’s on the same footing. He will give him more of a hearing than if it
was, I don’t know … Ed Miliband.”
Trump has
even declared his “love” for Charles.
The royal
admiration comes from Trump’s mother. Scottish-born Mary Anne Trump “loved the
Queen,” Trump said in July. The ratings-obsessed president appears to consider
the late monarch the ultimate TV star. “Whenever the queen was on television,
[my mother] wanted to watch,” he said during July's Turnberry visit.
The king
could benefit from an emotional link to First Lady Melania Trump, too. She was
present at the 2019 meeting and sat next to Charles at the state banquet that
year. In her 2024 memoir, Melania says they “engaged in an interesting
conversation about his deep-rooted commitment to environmental conservation.”
She and
Trump “exchange letters with King Charles to this day,” Melania wrote.
Taking
tea at the end of the world
The king
will have plenty of chances to make his case.
A state
visit provides “quite a lot of time to talk” for monarch and president, said
one former senior British government official, granted anonymity to discuss the
royals and their relationship with government.
There
will be a state banquet plus at least one private meeting in between, they
said. Charles may also be able to sneak some choice phrases into any speech he
gives at the banquet.
The king
receives regular briefing papers from the Foreign Office. As the meeting looms,
the same person suggested, he may be preparing thoughts on how to combine a
lifetime’s campaigning and reading with those briefings, to shape the
opportunity to lobby a president.
“He will
be reading his foreign policy material with even more interest than normal. He
will probably be thinking about whether there is any way in which he can pitch
his arguments to Trump that will shift him — a little bit — toward putting his
shoulder to the climate change wheel,” the former senior official said.
“He won’t
say: ‘You, America, should be doing stuff.’ He will say, ‘Internationally I
think it is important we make progress on this and we need to be more
ambitious.’ Or he might express concern about some of the impacts of climate
change on global weather and all these extreme weather events.”
However
he approaches it, 2019 showed how tough it is to move the dial.
After
that conversation, Trump told broadcaster Piers Morgan that he thought Charles’
views were “great” and that he had “totally listened to him.” But then he
demonstrated that — on the crucial points of how fossil fuels, carbon emissions
and climate change are affecting the planet — he totally hadn’t.
“He wants
to make sure future generations have climate that is good climate, as opposed
to a disaster,” Trump said. “And I agree,” he added, before promptly pivoting
to an apparent non-sequitur about the U.S. having “crystal clean” water.
It was a
typically Trumpian obfuscation. Asked about the king’s views during the
Turnberry visit, Trump said: “Every time I met with him, he talked about the
environment, how important it is. I’m all for it. I think that’s great.”
In nearly
the same breath, he ranted about wind energy being “a disaster.”
Good
luck, Charlie
“It is
difficult, if not impossible, to see [Trump] change his views on climate
change, because they’re not informed by his understanding of the science or
consequences, but rather by naked politics,” said leading U.S. climate
scientist Michael Mann in emailed remarks.
And Trump
will come to the meeting prepared, said Martins, the former U.S. Embassy
official.
“Trump
will receive the full briefing on the king’s views on environment. He won’t be
going into that blind. He’ll know exactly what the king has said over his
career and what his views are on it and how it affects American interests. I
don’t anticipate him being surprised by anything the king says.”
He added:
“Bashing net zero and President Biden … gets [Trump] political wins.”
To
Charles’ long-standing domestic critics, it all highlights the pointlessness of
his position.
“He is
bound by these constitutional expectations that he does nothing that will upset
the apple cart [in U.K./U.S. relations],” said Graham Smith, chief executive of
campaign group Republic, which calls for the abolition of the monarchy. “If he
was elected, he’d have a lot more freedom to say what he actually wants.”
“Soft
power is a highly questionable concept,” added Smith. It's only useful, he
argued, when backed by something Charles lacks and Trump has by the
bucket-load: “Hard power.”
And time
may be running out for Charles to deploy even soft power in the climate
fight.
Trump’s
chief U.K. political ally is Nigel Farage, whose anti-net-zero Reform UK
currently lead opinion polls. If British voters pick Reform at the next
election, Charles’ potential advocacy would be restrained by a government
opposed to action on climate change.
So how
far will Charles go to seize his moment?
He wrote
in Harmony: “If we continue to be deluded by the increasingly irresponsible
clamour of sceptical voices that doubt man-made climate change, it will soon be
too late to reverse the chaos we have helped to unleash.” He feared “failing in
my duty to future generations and to the Earth itself” if he did not speak
up.
Skelly,
the former speechwriter who co-wrote the book, predicted that Charles would
walk a fine diplomatic line — but was “not someone to sit on his hands or to
remain silent.”
“He was
warning about these things 30 years ago and nobody was listening. … He feels
increasingly frustrated that time is running out.
“I’d love
to be a fly on the wall — because it will be a fascinating conversation.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário