How
Europe Learned to Speak So Trump Would Listen
The
leaders of Germany, France, Britain and other supporters of Ukraine have come
together in exceptional ways to help sway the U.S. president.
Jim
Tankersley
By Jim
Tankersley
Reporting
from Berlin
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/19/world/europe/trump-putin-summit-europe.html
Aug. 19,
2025
By midday
Saturday in Europe, a question was bouncing between the government offices and
vacation villas of the continent’s most influential leaders. The Ukrainian
president was headed to the White House for a crucial meeting with President
Trump. Mr. Trump was allowing him to bring backup. But who should go?
It was
the sort of dilemma that once might have erupted into public disputes between
Germany, France and Britain, the continent’s largest powers. This time, it
didn’t.
The
leaders of those countries decided they would all accompany Volodymyr Zelensky,
the president of Ukraine, to Washington, for a summit with Mr. Trump about
peace talks with Russia. So would the leaders of Italy, Finland, the European
Union and NATO.
They flew
in on separate planes. But with Mr. Trump, they spoke in one voice.
“We were
well prepared and well coordinated,” Friedrich Merz, the chancellor of Germany,
told reporters after he and his counterparts met Mr. Trump at the White House.
“We also represented the same viewpoints. I think that really pleased the
American president.”
Mr.
Trump’s persistent and sometimes volatile effort to bring a diplomatic end to
the war between Ukraine and Russia has forged stronger bonds among European
leaders. It has strengthened the unity that emerged earlier this year amid Mr.
Trump’s tariff threats and his wavering on what have been decades-long security
guarantees that America has provided to Europe.
Since Mr.
Trump’s election, European leaders have raced to shore up their own defenses,
wary of losing American support. NATO members, led by Germany, have pledged to
increase their military spending significantly, to meet a target set by Mr.
Trump.
Mr. Merz,
President Emmanuel Macron of France and Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain
have signed new friendship treaties with one another and begun to build a set
of shadow diplomatic institutions, including one for Ukraine, that advance
European interests but do not include the United States.
The last
two weeks have forced them to coordinate even more closely, on the fly. After
Mr. Trump made the shock announcement that he would meet President Vladimir
Putin of Russia in Alaska, Mr. Merz quickly pulled together European allies for
a video call with Mr. Trump.
The
Europeans presented Mr. Trump with a five-point strategy for him to take into
the Alaska meeting — including the insistence that only Ukraine could negotiate
any land swaps with Russia, and that for serious peace talks to begin Russia
must first agree to a cease-fire. Mr. Trump signed on to it.
But at
the summit, he abandoned it— agreeing with Mr. Putin’s longstanding push to
negotiate a peace deal while fighting continues, a position that advantages
Russia, which is making gains on the battlefield.
That
reversal alarmed the European officials, even as they publicly stressed a few
areas where Mr. Trump had seemingly won concessions, like the need for a robust
multinational security guarantee for postwar Ukraine.
After Mr.
Trump called to brief Mr. Zelensky, and then the European leaders, on his way
back from Alaska early Saturday, they scrambled again. They agreed on the large
group to accompany Mr. Zelensky, which was formalized by a White House
invitation on Saturday night, and hammered out a strategy for the meeting.
Early on Monday, they huddled at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington.
Their
script leaned heavily on flattery for Mr. Trump, which is by now standard
practice among visiting dignitaries, and on declarations of unity with each
other and with Mr. Trump.
“Everybody
around this table is in favor of peace,” Mr. Macron said, as television cameras
rolled, near the start of a large-group meeting with the president.
The
Europeans avoided big disagreements with Mr. Trump; the closest anyone came to
a diplomatic row was when Mr. Merz, on camera, repeated his belief that talks
between Mr. Zelensky and Mr. Putin could only happen if a cease-fire was in
place. Privately, Mr. Merz pressed Mr. Trump on at least forcing a cease-fire
for the duration of any actual meeting between Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelensky.
They also
tugged on Mr. Trump’s heartstrings. Mr. Zelensky presented a letter from his
wife to Melania Trump, the first lady, echoing Mrs. Trump’s public concerns
over the fate of Ukrainian children abducted by Russian troops. Mr. Zelensky
and Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union, raised the topic
again shortly before their meeting ended and Mr. Trump left to call Mr. Putin.
European
leaders expressed confidence that the approach had helped to break whatever
spell Mr. Putin appeared to have cast over Mr. Trump in Alaska, and that Mr.
Trump had ended the day back in agreement with them over most points about the
peace process.
Mr.
Trump, in an interview with Fox News on Tuesday, sounded pleased with the
Europeans who had visited him. “They want to get back to leading their
countries,” he said. “They’re consumed with this far more than we are.”
He also
took credit, in a way, for their united front. “A year ago, they wouldn’t have
come,” he said. “They wouldn’t have even thought about it.”
Jim
Tankersley is the Berlin bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of
Germany, Austria and Switzerland.



Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário