U.S.
Reaches Preliminary Trade Deal With Europe
The United
States and the European Union agreed to a 15 percent base tariff after weeks of
negotiations, which were among the Trump administration’s most difficult
discussions.
The United
States and the European Union also agreed to drop tariffs to zero on a range of
goods, including aircraft, plane parts, certain chemicals, certain generic
drugs, semiconductor equipment and some agricultural products.
Ana Swanson Jeanna Smialek Melissa Eddy
By Ana
Swanson Jeanna Smialek
and Melissa Eddy
Ana Swanson
reported from Washington, Jeanna Smialek from Brussels and Melissa Eddy from
Berlin.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/27/world/europe/eu-trade-deal-trump-tariffs.html
July 27,
2025
The European
Union and the United States agreed on Sunday to a broad-brush trade deal that
sets a 15 percent tariff on most E.U. goods, including cars and
pharmaceuticals, averting what could have become a painful trade war with a
bloc that is the United States’ single biggest source of imports.
President
Trump said that the European Union had agreed to purchase $750 billion of
American energy, which Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the E.U.’s
executive branch, told reporters would be spread out over three years.
The
27-nation bloc also agreed to increase its investment in the United States by
more than $600 billion above current levels, Mr. Trump said, adding that the
European Union would buy military equipment. A senior U.S. official said that
those investments would include pharmaceuticals and the automotive industry,
among others.
The two
sides also agreed to drop tariffs to zero on a range of goods, including
aircraft, plane parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor
equipment and some agricultural products, Ms. von der Leyen said.
Altogether,
while it was clear that major details still needed to be hammered out, the
framework seemed likely to permanently reshape the trading relationship between
two of the world’s largest and most interconnected economies.
The
agreement will “rebalance, but enable trade on both sides,” Ms. von der Leyen
said as she sat next to Mr. Trump and the leaders made the announcement.
“We made
it,” Mr. Trump said.
Not all
higher tariffs were eliminated. A senior U.S. official said the 50 percent
tariff the Trump administration had imposed on steel and aluminum globally was
not part of the deal, though Ms. von der Leyen suggested that those might be
reduced through further negotiation.
The U.S.
official added that European pharmaceutical and semiconductor exports will be
subject to a 15 percent tariff, regardless of what tariffs the Trump
administration ultimately levies on those industries in other countries.
The
administration is currently preparing an investigation that will apply tariffs
to those sectors globally, which the official said could come in two or three
weeks. Pharmaceuticals are Europe’s most important export to the United States,
and those pending tariffs had become an obstacle to resolving the trade talks.
Ms. von der
Leyen said that no decisions had been made yet on whether wine and spirits
would be exempt. That is something that “has to be sorted out in the next
days,” she said.
Like many
preliminary agreements Mr. Trump has announced, this one had few details. For
some of the “deals” that Mr. Trump reached, other governments have seemed to
lack clarity on what exactly they agreed to, and it remains unclear which
tariff rates will apply to which products as of Aug. 1.
Though the
agreement leaves many questions to be resolved, it could bring a measure of
calm to one of the world’s most important economic relationships and allay
fears of an escalating trade war. The European Union last year accounted for
nearly $610 billion of the $3.3 trillion in goods imported by the United
States.
The 15
percent tariff rate given to Europe mirrors the main tariff rate of the
U.S.-Japanese trade agreement that was announced last Tuesday, and is lower
than the 19 and 20 percent rates imposed on several Southeast Asian countries.
But it is higher than the 10 percent tax that Europeans had been angling for,
and that Mr. Trump applied to British goods.
It’s also
much higher than tariffs have been historically. According to the World Trade
Organization, before Mr. Trump came into office, the trade-weighted tariff the
United States charged on foreign goods was 2.2 percent, while the European
Union’s was 2.7 percent.
“There’s a
lot of issues that I think are still very unclear,” said Mujtaba Rahman,
managing director for Europe at the Eurasia Group. “If there aren’t further
exemptions to be negotiated to that 15 percent, I think it’s a far more
suboptimal deal than the member states were hoping to achieve.”
The deal
followed weeks of unpredictable talks. The Europeans believed they were close
to a deal, only to have Mr. Trump send them a letter on July 11 threatening a
rate of 30 percent unless an agreement was reached by Aug. 1.
Even after
that announcement, Ms. von Der Leyen had stressed the importance of continuing
talks and trying to reach a negotiated deal. But the European Union also
continued working to put the finishing touches on a plan to retaliate against
Mr. Trump’s tariffs, one that could be enacted quickly if needed.
They
finalized that raft of potential countermeasures last week. The goal was to
create leverage. And, if talks broke down, some of the 27 E.U. member states
thought that having a plan to hit back was essential.
The new deal
may prevent any retaliation and thus avoid a tit-for-tat trade war that could
have been economically damaging for both sides. A trade conflict could also
have further soured the European Union and United States’ relationship —
already strained this year by issues surrounding military spending, support for
Ukraine, free speech and technology regulation.
“The
European response on trade would have been fundamentally different had they not
been worried about backlash in these other geopolitical theaters,” Mr. Rahman
said.
U.S.
officials said that they had met with the Europeans for round after round of
negotiations, with the E.U. originally not offering many concessions. But after
Mr. Trump sent the bloc a letter threatening stiff tariffs, they made more
headway. The Europeans had also acknowledged Mr. Trump’s argument that the
trade relationship was unbalanced and needed to be corrected, the officials
said.
Bringing
down the tariff on European auto exports was another sticking point for the
Europeans, especially Germany, the largest E.U. economy. Mr. Trump imposed a 25
percent tariff on foreign cars and car parts in April. European automakers,
which sent cars worth 38.5 billion euros ($45 billion) to the United States
last year, have been suffering under those hefty rates.
“The
agreement successfully averted a trade conflict that would have hit the
export-oriented German economy hard,” Friedrich Merz, Germany’s chancellor,
said in a comment after the announcement.
Mr. Trump
also lowered the tariff rate on Japanese auto exports to 15 percent as part of
the deal announced last week. But those exemptions have raised immediate
concern among auto manufacturers elsewhere, including in the United States,
Mexico and South Korea, which are still paying higher tariffs.
Patrick
Anderson, the chief executive of Anderson Economic Group, said the difference
could lead to “a cost penalty of thousands of dollars per vehicle for numerous
models assembled in the U.S.” that use foreign parts.
“How can the
administration square a 15 percent tariff on cars from Europe and Japan, while
manufacturers in the U.S., Canada and Mexico are laboring under 25 percent
tariffs?” he asked.
Ms. von der
Leyen acknowledged that the tariffs that will now prevail are much higher than
the 2.5 percent that applied before the Trump administration came into office.
But she also pointed out that the 15 percent rate that negotiators had managed
to arrive at was much lower than what might have prevailed had no deal been
reached.
“We should
not forget where we came from,” Ms. von der Leyen said.
Ana Swanson
covers trade and international economics for The Times and is based in
Washington. She has been a journalist for more than a decade.
Jeanna
Smialek is the Brussels bureau chief for The Times.
Melissa Eddy
is based in Berlin and reports on Germany’s politics, businesses and its
economy.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário