George Santos scandal: Democratic predecessor
calls him a ‘con man’
Tom Suozzi, Santos’s forerunner for New York’s third
district, says the Republican winner should be ‘removed by Congress’
Tom Suozzi, the Democrat who once occupied George
Santos’ seat, likened the controversial Republican to Sam Bankman-Fried and
Bernie Madoff, two disgraced figures in the finance and crypto industries.
Martin
Pengelly in New York
@MartinPengelly
Wed 4 Jan
2023 06.00 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/04/george-santos-scandal-tom-suozzi-con-man
The
Democrat who vacated the US House seat won by the controversial Republican
George Santos said on Tuesday Congress was letting in “a con man”.
Tom Suozzi
won New York’s third district, which covers parts of Long Island and Queens, in
2016, but stepped down in 2022 in order to run for governor. Santos lost to
Suozzi in 2020 but beat Robert Zimmerman for the vacant seat.
Since
Santos’s victory, almost every part of his campaign biography has been called
into question.
Intense
scrutiny has been applied to his claims about his education and career in
business and to elements of his personal story, including his supposed descent
from Holocaust survivors and a claim that his mother died as a result of the
9/11 attacks. Santos has admitted to some inaccuracies.
But even
after prosecutors in Brazil reactivated a criminal fraud investigation
regarding the use of a stolen chequebook, and amid reports that federal
prosecutors in New York are examining Santos’s background and financial
dealings, Republicans in Congress have not acted.
On Tuesday,
as the new Congress gathered, Suozzi pointed out in a column for the New York
Times that on being sworn in, Santos would take “an oath to ‘bear true faith’
to the constitution and [to] take this obligation without any ‘purpose of
evasion’”.
Suozzi
wrote: “I’ve lost track of how many evasions and lies Mr Santos has told about
himself, his finances and his history and relationship with our stretch of Long
Island and north-eastern Queens.”
Santos
being seated in Congress, Suozzi said, would “diminish our Congress, our
country and … his constituents.
“It saddens
me that after 30 years of public service rooted in hard work and service to the
people of this area, I’m being succeeded by a con man.”
When Santos
arrived on Capitol Hill, he ignored questions from a scrum of reporters. Before
being sworn in, he supported Kevin McCarthy for speaker. He could not be
formally sworn in until the speakership had been decided. That process was
delayed until Wednesday at least, an overnight adjournment having followed
three inconclusive votes.
Suozzi said
Santos could still be held to account by “our democracy, our free press and the
rule of law” as well as “the voters of the third district”.
Those
voters, he wrote, “believe in the rule of law, in playing by the rules. They
like authenticity in their leaders and pride themselves on having a good BS
detector.
“The fact
is that Mr Santos’s behavior went beyond BS: he fabricated the basics of his
biography to an extent that most voters wouldn’t have thought possible. The
shame would be too great, right?”
Lamenting
the rise of political shamelessness, Suozzi pointed to Donald Trump’s famous
2016 claim that “he could ‘shoot somebody’ on Fifth Avenue and still not lose
supporters”.
Suozzi
wrote: “If we are going to subdue the tyranny of unchecked liars and their lies
then Mr Santos must be held accountable: he must be removed by Congress or by
prosecutors, because there is no indication that he will be moved by conscience
to voluntarily resign.”
Suozzi
likened Santos to Sam Bankman-Fried and Bernie Madoff, the former a
cryptocurrency magnate who has pleaded not guilty to charges of fraud, the
latter sentenced to 150 years in 2009 over the largest Ponzi scheme in history.
Suozzi
said: “Not unlike them, [Santos] appears to have conducted his finances in
highly unusual, if not unlawful, ways. But I have to wonder, having seen his
delight for attention and his self-regard, if he loves that everyone now knows
his name – even though it’s because of yet another big lie.”
Suozzi
insisted Santos would be held accountable.
“The people
of my district are holding rallies, signing petitions and calling on the
Republican leadership to act,” he wrote.
Calling the
district “a model for moderation … a 50-50 district with constituents who embrace
a get-it-done attitude” and “value tell-it-like-it-is leadership”, Suozzi said
those voters now found themselves “saddled with a slippery, inexperienced liar
who tells it like it isn’t”.
Such New
Yorkers, Suozzi said, were now “counting on the press to keep digging in, law
enforcement to keep investigating and the political pressure to keep building
on the House”, in order to remove Santos from Congress.
.webp)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário