Trump Search Live Updates: Documents at
Mar-a-Lago Included Top Secret Information
A redacted affidavit released on Friday said the
former president took highly classified national security documents from the
White House. Senator Mark Warner, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee,
called for an assessment of the damages posed by the mishandling of
information.
Glenn
Thrush, Alan Feuer and Maggie Haberman
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/08/26/us/trump-warrant-affidavit
Documents
at Mar-a-Lago could compromise human intelligence sources, redacted affidavit
says.
WASHINGTON
— The Justice Department asked to search President Donald J. Trump’s Florida
residence after retrieving an initial batch of highly classified national
security documents, out of concern that their disclosure could compromise
“clandestine human sources” used in intelligence gathering, according to a
redacted version of the affidavit used to obtain the warrant.
The
affidavit — including more than three dozen pages of evidence and legal arguments
presented by the Justice Department’s national security division plus
supporting documents — describes the government’s monthslong push to recover
highly classified materials taken from the White House by a former president
who viewed state documents as his private property.
And for the
first time it reveals the government’s source for information on the movement
of documents into, and within, the Mar-a-Lago complex, “a significant number of
civilian witnesses” with knowledge of Mr. Trump’s post-presidential actions.
The heavily
redacted affidavit was released on Friday, 18 days after F.B.I. agents
descended on Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence and private club with a
court-authorized search warrant and carted off additional material marked as
classified, citing possible violations of the Espionage Act and obstruction of
justice statutes.
There is
“probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found” at Mr.
Trump’s house, prosecutors wrote in requesting the search.
Under
orders from the judge in the case, Bruce E. Reinhart, the Justice Department
had proposed extensive redactions to the affidavit in an effort to shield
witnesses from intimidation or retribution. The government did so to protect
the broader integrity of its inquiry into whether Mr. Trump had violated the
Espionage Act and other laws by willfully retaining national security records
that he was required to turn over to the National Archives.
While the
government redacted details pertaining to witnesses in the Mar-a-Lago
investigation, the affidavit vividly describes the dangers posed if their
identities, or even actions, were made public.
“First and
foremost, the government must protect the identity of witnesses at this stage
of the investigation to ensure their safety,” two department lawyers wrote in
explaining their redaction requests.
Witnesses,
they wrote, could be subjected “retaliation, intimidation, or harassment, and
even threats to their physical safety” —
adding that Judge Reinhart himself had already noted those dangers were “not
hypothetical in this case.”
The search,
the affidavit reveals, was prompted by an intensive F.B.I. review of an initial
15 boxes of materials that Mr. Trump turned over to the archives in January,
after months of government pressure.
In those
boxes, they found a total of 184 documents with classification markings,
including 25 marked “top secret.”
But agents
were most alarmed to discover that many of the materials included the highest
national security restrictions, requiring they be held in controlled government
storage facilities, and barring them from ever being shared with foreign
governments, to protect “clandestine human sources” employed by the
intelligence community to collect information around the world, according to
the documents.
The
affidavit does not disclose the nature of the material or why Mr. Trump chose
to retain it.
Those
concerns, and the continued unwillingness of Mr. Trump to return sensitive
documents that the archives knew remained in his possession, prompted the
department’s leaders to move quickly, according to officials.
The
redactions, which blanket about half of the affidavit, covered many of the most
sensitive details of the Justice Department’s investigation; whole swaths of
the filing are blacked out, included most of pages 11 through 16. As a result,
there are limited references to the witnesses or investigative methods that led
to the findings laid out by lawyers with the department’s national security
division, who persuaded Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to sign off on the
highly unusual request for a search.
On Friday
morning, before the documents were released, Mr. Trump attacked the department
on Truth Social, the social media platform he uses to communicate since being
banned from Twitter after the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021. He called the
Justice Department and the F.B.I. “political Hacks and Thugs” who “had no right
under the Presidential Records Act to storm Mar-a-Lago and steal everything in
sight, including Passports and privileged documents.”
The fact
that any of the affidavit was made public is a remarkable turn of events. Such
documents are almost always left entirely sealed until criminal charges are
filed, and even then they tend to emerge only as important legal issues in a
case are litigated. There is no indication the Justice Department plans to file
charges in the documents case anytime soon.
The partial
release came after several news organizations, including The New York Times,
filed a motion this month asking Judge Reinhart to unseal the entire document,
citing enormous public interest in the search of Mar-a-Lago.
The Justice
Department responded by saying the affidavit, if unsealed, would provide a road
map to its investigation and wanted Judge Reinhart to keep it fully under
wraps. Mr. Trump’s lawyers did not object, to the astonishment of Mr. Garland’s
team, who believe the disclosures portray the former president’s actions in a
deeply unflattering light.
At a
hearing last week, Judge Reinhart, apparently seeking a middle ground, floated
the idea of releasing portions of the affidavit. He ordered the government to
send proposed redactions to him by Thursday at noon and issued his decision to
release the redacted version within hours.
Justice
Department officials had suggested they would push hard to scrub anything that
could expose witnesses in the case. After the search at Mar-a-Lago, the F.B.I.
reported a surge in threats against its agents; an armed man tried to breach
the bureau’s Cincinnati field office before being killed in a shootout with the
local police.
The Trump
team has sought to portray the search as unjust and unnecessary, claiming there
were continuing talks between Mr. Trump’s side and the Justice Department that
led to the first tranche of boxes of documents being returned to the archives
in January.
But when
archives officials retrieved the 15 boxes of material in January, they opened
them to find mountains of paper, more than 700 pages of classified documents
because some individual documents contained multiple pages, some the most
sensitive and restricted that exist in government, known as Special Access
Programs.
The
archives alerted the Justice Department soon after with a referral, and a grand
jury was convened.
The
released affidavit does not reveal the amount of classified material turned
over to federal officials during a June 3 meeting between Justice Department
officials and Mr. Trump’s lawyers, which came after the grand jury had been
formed.
Mr. Trump
repeatedly resisted entreaties from several advisers to turn over the material,
as early as last summer, according to multiple people briefed on the matter.
“They’re mine,” he said of the boxes, according to three people familiar with
what took place.
Mr. Trump
went through at least some of the boxes in late 2021, although it is unclear if
he went through them all.
His lead
lawyers in the case met on June 3 with Jay Bratt, the chief of the
counterespionage section of the national security division at the Justice
Department. Shortly before that meeting, Mr. Corcoran went to the basement to
search through the boxes for classified material, according to two people
briefed on the matter.
The Justice
Department also gathered information from at least one witness suggesting that
there might be more presidential material at Mar-a-Lago. On June 22, the
department subpoenaed surveillance footage from various places in the club,
including the hallway outside a basement storage area where Mr. Corcoran and
Ms. Bobb had led Mr. Bratt nearly three weeks earlier to show him where
documents had been kept.
The video
showed boxes being moved out of the storage room sometime around the contact
from the Justice Department, people familiar with the tapes said. And it also
showed boxes being slipped into different containers, which alarmed
investigators.
On Aug. 8,
investigators found additional material, presidential records and classified
documents in the basement area, as well as in a container on the floor of Mr.
Trump’s closet in his office, a former dressing room in the bridal suite above
the club’s ballroom.
The closet
had a hotel-style safe, but it did not contain the materials investigators
sought, and was too small to hold the documents he had, according to several
people familiar with the events.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário